Interpretation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the canonical methods of interpretation?

A
  1. Grammatical/Textual- The wording and grammar are the starting point of interpretation. Gas connection to the social realm (example likelohood of insolvency)
  2. Systematic/ Contextual- A provision should not be considered on its own, but in the context in which the legislator has put it
    – requires a system which is often given in codes
    - for instance the German Civil Code (BGB)
  3. Historical
    -subjective- the intent of the legialtor at the tinr of legislation

-objective- distilling th eintent of the legislator from the genesis of the law-> incremental evolutionary approach
- Combine the subjective intent with legislative materials (reasons, explanations, comments…)

  1. Teleological
    * Seeking objective/purpose of the law
    * However, a real purpose is not evident
    - problematic is that there is too much room for interpretation
    * Amongst many, Savigny disregarded teleological interpretation
    * Teleological Interpretation is in particular necessary for older statutes/statutes that are inspired by
    natural law (e.g. ABGB)
    * It makes the law more flexible
    - Cf. Radbruch
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is subsumption via syllogism?

A

-clarified the intraction between norm and fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Derogations from the systematic/contextual interpretation

A
  1. Formal-expressly amended or repealed (Cf §9 ABGB)
  2. Substantive-change in substance without express amendment

-lex posterior(derogat legi priori )- the later law derogated the earlier.
Premise: several provisions are applicable to the same case
* Assumption: the legislator’s intent is more likely to be derived from the more recent provision

-lex specialis (derogat legi generali)-the more specific law prevails over a more general law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is hermeneutics?

A

teh science of undersatnding themeaning of for exampke texts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Name another (additioanal) methods of interpretation

A
  1. Constitutional (textual)
    - a formally subordinate norm is interpreted in conformity to the hierarchically superior norm
    - e. g. principle of equality
  2. Autonomous (systematic)- for terms of international law to have the same meaning, they must be understood independently of national law
  3. Treaty or Directive compliant Interpretation (Teleological)
    - to avoid a conflict between European and national law, transposing national law must be interpreted in light of the relevant directive
    - Follows from the supremacy of EU Law
  4. Comperative (historical)
    -looks across the border
    -indispencable for the contract of law rules
    -link with historical and systematical intrepreattion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain the interpretation PRAETER LEGEM

A

-interpretation “beyond the law”
-refers to situations or actions that are not explicitly regulated or prohibited by law but operate in a way that supplements or fills gaps in the legal framework

  1. Prerequisites:
    - Gap (lacuna)-not covered by the law or too broadly covered
    -The gap is against the plan of the legislator
    - Balancing of interests
  2. Methods
    -Analogy:
    - There is an unintentional gap in the law – something is not covered by the law
    - Comparable balancing of interests-to dinf the commonalities betwene the regulated and unregulated cases
    -PROHIBITED in the criminal law (bulla poena sine lege)

-Teleological reduction:
- There is an unintentional gap in the law – the norm text covers more than the intent of the legislator dictates
- Incomparable balancing of interests
- address overgeneralization by limiting the application of a law to cases that genuinely reflect its underlying rationale.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the reasons for different interpretation of the statutes and the contracts?

A
  • Statutes are unilateral instrument issued by the same body to all citizens
  • Interpretation is largely independent of any context
  • Contracts are made in different circumstances between different types of people in order to achieve
    various purposes
  • Interpretation is highly dependent on respective context
  • e.g. identity of parties, respective market and the purpose of the contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the methods of interpreattion suggested by Von Savigny?

A
  1. Grammatical
  2. Historical (von Savigny is proponent of the historical schoold of jurisprudence)
  3. Sustematic

There is no teleological method because:
-he viewed the law as an organci product of a nation’s Volksgeist-law that developed from the customs and traditions, and shared consciousness of a society over time, rather than being consciously designed to achieve particular purposes or ends

-such approaches risked imposing artificial constructs onto the organic evolution of law, disrupting its natural and historical continuity

-difference between Enlightenment-inspired rationalist codifications and historically grounded jurisprudence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Interessenjurisprudence?

A

-Jurisprudecen of Interests is a legal theory that emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, focusing on balancing competing social and individual interests within the framework of legal interpretation

-focus on the interesets, aiming to achieve fairness in balancing these interests

-While Savigny’s Historical School emphasized the organic development of law from the Volksgeist (spirit of the people) and its systematic coherence, Interessenjurisprudenz prioritized practical and purposive analysis

-Proponents: Puchta

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In which groups the interpreattional methods could be devided?

A
  1. inter-subjectivly accesible: textual+historical+ contextual-> don’t argue about what text says, what kind of word is in the provision
  2. subjective: teleological+systematical-> own preferences of a judge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is dialectical method and what does it consist from?

A

-form of reasoning and argumentation that involves the process of conflict and resolution of opposing ideas or forces
1. Thesis
2. Antithesis
3. Synthesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is ment by a minori as Maius/ a maiore ad Minus?

A
  1. argumentum a maiore ad minus (“Größenschluss”): what is true for all is true for one
  2. argumentum a minori ad maius: a narrower rule includes the broader rule
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is principle of stare decisis?

A

-principle that is moslty applied in the common law system
- judgments not only decide individual cases but are precedents for future ones →ensuring consistency and predictability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly