International Law Final Exam Flashcards
Jus Ad Bellum
Jus Ad Bellum relates to regulating when force may be used. When do states have a legitimate right to wage war? Evolution- 1907 Convention on the opening of hostilities (Required Declaration of War) League of Nations 1919 (Requirement of Abritration before War) 1928 General Treaty for renunciation of war
Just War Theory
Limit the frequency of war and restraint in the conduct of war.. 5 Criteria for legitimate use of force Seriousness of threat, Proper Purpose, Last Resort, Proportional means, and balance of consequences…. Jus ad bellum jus in bello
UN charter and jus ad bellum (Article 2.4, and Chapter 7)
Article 2.4 resulted in the prohibition of force and said “All members shall refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state” Chapter 7 authorizes the power of the security council to decide when a threat is imminent.
Collective Security used by the Security Council
Article 39 made the security council the designated authority on war and said” The SC shall determine the existence of any threat {or breach of the peace} and shall decide what measures shall be taken}
Uniting for peace revolution
Main point was that within the limits of its powers the GA could also authorize the use of force against aggressor states. Cannot order peace operations but can recommend them. Created the doorway to peacekeeping….. General Assembly resolution that granted themselves the ability to conduct peacekeeping operations
Peacekeeping Operations
No aggressor identified, Not only military operations, also development work, often no authorization to use force. Needs the acceptance of the host state.
Self-defense
UN charter article 51 recognizes an inherent right to legitimate defense. May occur If an armed attack occurs. Legal justification for using force and in order to justify the use, customary law has accepted
The Caroline Test
Immediacy- threat must leave no time for deliberation, Necessity- Instant overwhelming and leaving no means and no moment for deliberation, Proportionality- Defense proportionate to threat… Anticapatory self-defense is allowed if an attack is imminent but not preventative self-defense
Humanitarian Intervention
Humanitarian intervention is a human-rights based legality for intervention. The right for states to militarily intervene in a country in order to protect human rights. Looked at as a discretionary right not an obligation
Responsibility to protect
Responsibility to protect revolves around the debate that supports making humanitarian intervention an obligation. States should intervene in other states under the conditions that the state has failed to protect individuals. Not only should they intervene they should be involved in preventing atrocities and rebuilding.
Jus In Bello
Governs how force can be used, outlines behavior that is off limits, international humanitarian law
Hague Laws
The Hague laws place restrictions on the conduct of hostilities. Hague laws banned certain weapons in an attempt to adhere to the principles of discrimination between soldiers and civilians and the limiting of unnecessary suffer
Geneva Laws
Geneva Laws were made to protect people not taking part in active combat and included amelioration of the wounded in armed forces, wounded in the sea, treatment of prisoners in war, and protection of civilians.
Biological Weapons Convention
Biological weapons convention is the same situation as the CWC. First treating banning an entire category of weapons and only allowed research.
Chemical Weapons Convention
The chemical weapons convention outlaws the production, stock-piling, and use of chemical weapons.
Non-proliferation treaty
The non-proliferation treaty identified legal nuclear weapon states and banned proliferation to non-nuclear weapon states.
International Atomic Energy Agency
IAEA was made to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy and inhibit its use for any military purposes. Helps monitor the NPT
Lieber Code
Rules of war written during the US civil war supported by Lincoln. Instructions for US soldiers and what they can and can’t do when waging ware, centered around minimizing suffering.
Nuremberg Trials
First Treaty based definition of internationally defined criminal offenses, creation of crimes against humanity, required connection with international armed conflict.
International Criminal Court Jurisdiction
The ICC has jurisdiction over individuals who commit genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression.