International financial management Flashcards
International financial management Risks of international trading
International trade exposes companies to greater risk than just trading domestically.
These risks and how to mitigate them is assumed knowledge from BTF and FM:
Physical risk: Goods being lost/damaged in transit – can be mitigated with
insurance
Trade risk e.g. faulty products causing injury – can be mitigated with insurance
Liquidity risk: Inability to finance a longer operating cycle
Credit risk: Increased risk of bad debts
FX risk (covered in more detail later)
International financial management Risks of international trading 1.1 Mitigating credit and liquidity risks
Key ways of mitigating credit and liquidity risks:
Bill of exchange: A document drawn up by the exporter (seller) and sent to the
overseas buyer’s bank.
The bank accepts the obligation to pay the bill by signing it and therefore payment is
guaranteed.
The seller can sell or ‘discount’ the bill to a third party for cash now. Helps to reduce
the risk of bad debts and improve liquidity.
Forfaiting: A form of medium term, non-recourse, export financing, whereby a 3rd
party (the forfaiter) effectively purchases the receivable from the exporter.
Generally receivable is first converted into a financial instrument such as a bill of
exchange which is then purchased for cash at a discount by the forfaiter.
Export factoring: Similar to domestic factoring.
Documentary Credit/Letter of credit: Letters of credit provide a method of payment
in international trade which is risk free.
The arrangement between the exporter, the buyer and participating banks must take
place before the export sale takes place.
The exporter receives immediate payment of the amount due, less the discount from
the bank.
The buyer is often able to get a period of credit before having to pay for the imports.
Export credit insurance: Insurance against the risk of non-payment by foreign
customers for export debts.
Although international expansion was covered at the professional level in both FM
and BST, it is examinable in more detail at the advanced stage.
International financial management Risks of international trading 2.1 Deciding what markets to enter
The three main headings from Kotler’s market entry matrix can be used to help
evaluate possible markets for expansion:
1. Market attractiveness – considerations include income per head and forecast
demand.
2. Competitive advantage – the expected level of competitive advantage can be
judged by previous experience in similar markets
3. Risk – especially, the risk of currency fluctuations and remittance restrictions.
The best markets to enter will be low risk but also have high market attractiveness
and potential for competitive advantage.
3.2.2 Market entry modes
There are two main methods of entering overseas markets:
1. Exporting
2. Overseas production, which can be subdivided into:
– Outsourced/contracted manufacture
– Overseas production (setting up overseas operations)
International financial management Risks of international trading 2.1 Deciding what markets to enter Exporting
Pros:
Economies of scale from concentrated production in one location
Opportunity to test the success of a product overseas before committing to an
overseas operation
Can be done on a small scale/accessible for smaller companies
Avoid set up costs of overseas operation/minimise operating costs (no real
need of overseas staff etc.)
Can gain access to local knowledge by using a local distributor (indirect
exporting).
Cons:
Exposure to FX risk
Export taxes/tariffs and red tape
Production costs may be lower with overseas manufacture.
International financial management Risks of international trading 2.1 Deciding what markets to enter Outsourced/contracted manufacture
Pros:
No investment in operations required
Access to 3rd party expertise in production/local compliance issues
Enables the company to focus on its core competencies
The outsourcing company may benefit from economies of scale, which may
result in a lower price
Cons:
Finding a suitable overseas producer
The need to train the contractee’s personnel
Contractee may copy designs and set themselves up as a competitor
Loss of control/quality issues
Bad press associated with the perception of jobs leaving the home country
Difficult to bring back in-house if required later on
Data security if information is shared.
International financial management Risks of international trading 2.1 Deciding what markets to enter Overseas production (setting up overseas operations)
This section focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of overseas production
compared to exporting. Setting up an overseas operation is discussed in more detail
in the next section.
Pros:
May enable a better understanding of the overseas market
Potential access to cheaper labour and factory costs
Lower storage and transportation costs if also serving that market
Local production may help win public sector orders
Reduced FX risk if also serving that market.
Cons:
Significant investment in overseas plant
Higher transport costs/longer lead times if serving home market
Compliance with local health and safety regulations
Potential loss of control/quality issues
Problems recruiting local staff/managers.
International financial management Setting up an overseas operation
There are several ways of setting up an overseas operation:
Acquisition
Setting up an overseas subsidiary
Overseas branch
Joint ventures
Strategic alliance
Franchising
An exam question may ask you to evaluate several options for setting
up an overseas operation. Thus, an awareness of the generic pros and
cons of each alternative will help you generate specific ideas in the
exam.
International financial management Setting up an overseas operation Overseas branch
Pros:
Establishment of a branch likely to be simpler than a subsidiary
Remitted profits from a subsidiary may be taxed at a higher rate than those of a
branch
It may be easier to utilise the tax relief generated by the initial losses in a
branch than if those losses were in a foreign subsidiary
Cons:
The parent company will be fully liable for any obligations of the branch
Customers and banks may prefer to deal with a local company rather than a
branch of an O/S company
International financial management Setting up an overseas operation Acquisition
Pros:
Acquiring an established business grants access to:
– Knowledge of the local market
– Established customer base/market share
– Established distribution channels/customer relationships
– Existing brand/reputation
– Management expertise in local marketing/distribution/production
– Any intangible assets such as patents and trademarks
Access to finance may be improved by access to additional cash or debt
capacity in the acquired company
Circumnavigating trade barriers
Removal of a competitor
Start-up costs avoided
Other synergies, for example:
– Increased utilisation of shared central services e.g. finance
– Economies of scope in marketing
– Rationalisation and sale of surplus assets
Cons:
Culture clashes
Integration costs/problems e.g. unforeseen costs in integrating IT systems
Acquisition cost may be expensive (and may reduce shareholder wealth if a
premium is paid to obtain control plus fees exceeds synergies)
Higher than expected reorganisation costs e.g. redundancies etc.
Duplication of resources/operations across the new group
Potential reputational damage from prior actions of target
Public opinion and reaction
International financial management Setting up an overseas operation Setting up an overseas subsidiary
Pros:
A local company may be better received by local consumers
As a separate local legal entity, a subsidiary may be able to qualify for
government grants and tax reliefs that a branch cannot
The parent will have greater control of systems and processes (compared to the
acquisition of an existing company)
Limited liability can protect the parent company if the subsidiary suffers losses
(with a branch the parent would be liable)
Cons:
Legal costs to set-up overseas
Significant regulatory burden
In some regimes, the activities of the subsidiary may be limited to the objects
set out in its constitution
Legal complexities of dissolving a subsidiary on exit
Unlike an acquisition, there is no access to established local brands, distribution
networks etc.
International financial management Setting up an overseas operation Strategic alliance
Pros:
Sharing of development costs
May be easier than a takeover if there are regulations in place restricting
ownership
Can be complementary markets or technology
It is possible that the companies are able to learn from each other
Ability to spread risk. E.g. new technology is expensive and uncertain and may
be better to acquire with a partnering company, rather than buy and update
individually.
Cons:
It may restrict the ability to generate new core competencies
Difficult to achieve economies of scale as the two entities remain separate
Less control
Risk to the reputation
Potential for conflict.
International financial management Setting up an overseas operation Joint ventures
Pros:
Gives relatively low-cost access to O/S markets
Working with a local partner may make it easier to raise finance in a foreign
country (in particular the JV may have access to government grants and tax
reliefs that an O/S company wouldn’t qualify for)
Access to existing local knowledge, contacts and skills of the JV partner
Sharing of set up and operating costs
Sharing of risk
If there are legal restrictions on foreign ownership of local branches/companies,
a JV may be the only way to access the O/S market
Cons:
Culture clashes
Lack of freedom to determine systems, processes and strategic direction (has
to be agreed with partner)
Potential disagreements over operating decisions and ownership structure
Sharing of profits
Risk of the JV partner gaining information/technology that could later be used in
competing businesses
International financial management Setting up an overseas operation Franchising
Pros:
Reduces capital requirements
Reduces managerial resources required
Can be a quicker method of expansion
Benefits of specialisation, the franchisee can focus on their skills without
needing to deal with other elements of the business, e.g. marketing
Lower head office costs as there is a considerable delegation of operational
responsibility to the franchisees.
Cons:
Profits are shared
Candidates need to be selected on competency, which can be time consuming
Less control
Risk to the reputation
Potential for conflict
International financial management Remittance restrictions 4.1 Impact of remittance restrictions on NPV
The most likely scenario is that no repatriation of funds is allowed until the end of the
project.
However, a common assumption is that cash flows generated by the foreign
subsidiary can earn interest in a foreign bank account until the suspension of
repatriation is lifted at the end of the project.
The approach to this type of question is very similar to a normal foreign NPV
question.
International financial management Transfer pricing for multinationals
BST recap: Market price is generally considered to be an appropriate transfer price,
which should lead to division managers making goal congruent decisions.
However, multinational companies may wish to charge higher or lower prices to
artificially reduce or increase profits in a foreign subsidiary.