International Cooperation and law Flashcards
International Cooperation
Occurs when states adopt behavior that aligns with the preferences of other states.
• Cooperation between states
is much more common than conflict. International relations theories have differing approaches to evaluating why states cooperate with one another.
• Realism and the Cooperation Problem
Realist and cooperation
Realist posit
that cooperation is difficult because of the relative gains problem and the prisoner’s dilemma.
• Anarchy leads to a self-help world in which states focus on relative gains, where a gain in power for one state relative to another means it is better able to coerce that other state.
In realism
Because the benefits of cooperation are likely to be unevenly distributed, states are likely to be hesitant to cooperate.
• Realists also argue that cooperation is
difficult because of cheating as exemplified by the prisoner’s dilemma.
The fear that one state, after making a cooperative agreement will renege on its promise,
In realism
will reduce the chances of cooperation and thus make noncooperation the most rational choice.
• Nash Equilibrium
when there is doubt about the possibility of the other prisoner defecting (cheating), the most stable option is to defect (not cooperate).
• Cooperation yields
In realism
the optimum result for both parties.
o Solutions to the cooperation problem
liberal theories provide potential solutions to the cooperation problem.
• Neoliberal institutionalism and cooperation
o Neoliberal institutionalism is the branch
of liberal theory that most directly answers realists concerns.
NeoLiberalism Agrees with realist assumptions regarding
anarchy and self-interest but concludes that these assumptions lead to cooperation because of repeated interactions that facilitate reciprocity.
o International institutions can play
In neoliberalism
an important role in fostering the reciprocity that can sustain cooperation.
o Institutions lengthen the shadow of the future
In liberalism
by providing a framework for interaction that increases the expectation that states will continue to interact well into the future.
o International institutions and treaties provide states
In liberalism
with clear standards of acceptable behavior, and this template of what cooperative behavior looks like enables states to appropriately align their actions with international norms and standards.
o International institutions provide states
In liberalism
with information about the behavior of other states; knowing what other states are doing motivates reciprocity.
• International law is a
body of rules and norms regulating interactions among states and between states and IGOs.
• Functions of international law include
o rules and norms that create order and set expectations,
o mechanisms for dispute settlement,
• Functions of international law also include
o protection of the status quo,
o guarantees of fairness and equity,
o legitimization of the use of force by government.
• History of international law
o Grotian tradition: Hugo Grotius argued that states, like people, are rational, law abiding, and capable of cooperation.
Thus, he concluded that international relations between states is based on the rule of law, specifically the law of nations and the law of nature. He rejected the idea that states can do whatever they wish, a hallmark of sovereignty
• Sources of international law
o Customs
Habits that become engrained as more states follow
the same tradition; they eventually become codified into customary law.
Customary law is limited: it can take
it can become outdated as technology changes; it can lead to ambiguity in interpretation.
o Treaties
Legally binding, explicitly written agreements
between states that lay out rights and obligations.
The creation and enforcement of treaties is governed by the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969). According to the convention,
once states meet and work out the details of a treaty, its adoption is typically done either by consensus or by at least a two-thirds majority vote of participating states.
While some treaties simply require a signature to be legally binding,
most also require ratification through the domestic process.
Stages of treaties
States meet and work out the details of the treaty
Adoption: signifies that negotiations over the text have finalized: typically by consensus or by at least a two-thirds majority.
The middle stages of treaties
Signature: states can choose to sign or not sign, regardless of whether they participated or not in the negotiations
Ratification: most treaties require legislative approval
Enter into force: Depends on the specifications of the treaty (minimum number of states that ratify it, period of time, etc.). States that have ratified the treaty are legally bound only when the treaty enters into force.
The last stage of treaties
Acceding: State can also join a treaty even after it has entered into force and even if it is no longer open for signature.
o Vertical enforcement:
legal process by which one actor constrains the actions of another over which it has authority to secure its compliance with the law.
Top-down enforcement
some international institutions, like the International Court of Justice (ICJ), have the power to enforce state compliance.
The ICJ:
(a) settles legal disputes between states in accordance with international law; (b) gives advisory opinions on legal matters
The ICJ, however, has some noteworthy weaknesses:
Both parties must agree to the court’s jurisdiction before a case is taken.
Non-compulsory jurisdiction
ICJ last weakness
Only states can initiate proceedings.
Horizontal enforcement
process by which states work to elicit compliance with international law by other states.
Two mechanisms of horizontal enforcement
power and reciprocity.
Power
In horizontal law
states comply with international law because more powerful states make them
Collective action
In horizontal law
when states join together against the violator of international law
Reciprocity
In horizontal law
the desire to reap the gains of cooperation will incentivize states to comply with the laws (recall prisoner’s dilemma)
o Self-interest
International laws and international institutions are effective only if states comply with the rules and obligations. States are motivated to comply only when it is in their self-interest.
Self-interested states benefit by
participating in making the rules through treaties because that enables them to ensure the rules are in their interest.
o Normative and ethical explanations
States comply for ethical reasons, because it is the right thing to do.
o Normative and ethical explanations
States fear being labeled a pariah and losing face and prestige,
so they comply in order to be seen as legitimate.