International Business Strategy (IB) Flashcards
According to Cullen & Parboteeach (2010), what are the five drivers for globalization?
A) technology B) trade liberalization and increased movements of people and resource C) global products and customers D) global competition E) political changes
According to Cullen & Parboteeach (2010), one of the drivers of globalization is technology. Explain briefly why this is.
Enhanced coordination between HQ and subsidiary: the increased use of technology allows companies to manage globally dispersed operations more effectively. In the contemporary world, an MNE can manage its multiple subsidiaries around the world in a more coordinated manner, with the help of technology such as various communication tools - making firm globalization a significantly more feasible option than before the rise of IT.
Better ability to reach customers: Technology enables companies to reach customers around the world, enabling them to sell their products in markets where it has no physical presence.
According to Cullen & Parboteeach (2010), one of the drivers of globalization is trade liberalization and the rise of trade agreements and blocs. Explain briefly why this is.
The general liberalization of trade and the rise of trade agreements and blocs also serve as amplifying factors for globalization. The introduction of regional trade blocs such as the EU has eliminated barriers to trade and to labor and resource mobility, thus diminishing the importance of borders and making globalization a more attractive endeavor than before.
This may be exemplified by an MNC being able to transfer employees within its subsidiary network in EU, and thereby allow better knowledge transfer through inter-subsidiary visits.
According to Cullen & Parboteeach (2010), one of the drivers of globalization is global products and customers. Explain briefly why this is.
Today, we see an increasing introduction of “global” products, which with minor to no adaptation can be marketed worldwide. Customers everywhere are looking for similar products to meet their similar needs. This enhances a company’s ability to enter foreign markets with smaller capital and resource commitments required for such a move. Examples of such products include the iPhone. Thus, the increased customer acceptance of global products has eased the process of globalization for many companies.
According to Cullen & Parboteeach (2010), one of the drivers of globalization is global competition. Explain briefly why this is.
Companies in many industries have optimized their supply and value chains, locating their activities where it makes business sense. As the increased globalization has led to companies being exposed to global competition, these firms must enhance their efficiency or gain access to superior capabilities in order to remain competitive - which in turn further amplifies the globalization trend.
According to Cullen & Parboteeach (2010), one of the drivers of globalization is political change. Explain briefly why this is.
The political changes in recent decades have opened up many countries that before were less open to international trade and entry of foreign companies. This has essentially created new attractive markets for MNEs to enter, thus facilitating globalization
From the semi-globalization/ regionalism view, why do firms not fully expand globally? What are arguments staying within one’s region?
Staying within one’s home region allows the firm to exploit scale and scope advantages.
Regional firms do move beyond their local home market, which permits them access to foreign customers, suppliers, and R&D. Thus, they still get some of the advantages that follow international expansion.
Meanwhile, they are limiting their risks connected to conducting global operations, such as management of subsidiaries that are geographically distant from the HQ.
According to Porter (1997), antecedents to rivalry include positional and structural. What are the 7 examples mentioned in class of how these two antecendents may create rivalry?
1) players have similar strength and market positions
2) the pie is fixed: the market has no/limited growth, and firms can only sustain or grow by stealing market share from others
3) high fixed cost structures in the industry
4) excess production capacity
5) low demand/ ability for product differentiation (–> focus on cost leadership)
6) high strategic stakes
7) high barriers to exit the market
According to Porter (1997), antecedents to rivalry include positional and structural. One of the 7 examples mentioned in class is that HIGH FIXED COST structures lead to increased/ sustained rivalry. Explain why this is
High fixed cost structures in an industry will likely imply that firms are operating close to full capacity. Thus, in times of downward demand fluctuation, companies will have excess production capacity, which serves as an incentive for the players to engage in price cutting to enable a higher demand. This price cutting is a manifestation of rivalry.
According to Porter (1997), antecedents to rivalry include positional and structural. One of the 7 examples mentioned in class is that FIXED PIE leads to increased/ sustained rivalry. Explain why this is
Fixed pie refers to when a market is either in decine/ steady state or with very limited growth. This entails that companies operating in this industry are forced to steal market share from competitors in an effort to grow - which in turn facilitates rivalry.
According to Porter (1997), antecedents to rivalry include positional and structural. One of the 7 examples mentioned in class is that SIMILAR MARKET POSITIONS AND STREGNTHS lead to increased/ sustained rivalry. Explain why this is.
In a market where several competitors are equally strong and occupy similar market positions, this creates a linkage between such players, and an incentive for them to engage in competitive attagks and responses in order to steal and maintain the strengh/position.
According to Porter (1997), antecedents to rivalry include positional and structural. One of the 7 examples mentioned in class is that MAJOR BARRIERS TO EXIT lead to increased/ sustained rivalry. Explain why this is
When it is difficult to exit the market (can be all types of barriers such as strategic, financial and emotional barriers), this forces companies to stay in the market even though the market may be unprofitable. Firms may concurrently engage in extreme tactics (e.g., price competition)
According to Porter (1997), antecedents to rivalry include positional and structural. One of the 7 examples mentioned in class is that HIGH STRATEGIC STAKES lead to increased/ sustained rivalry. Explain why this is.
High strategic stakes materializes in markets that are of particular great importance to several players. This can e.g., be due to high local customer sophistication, high supply of local talent, abundance of relevant resources, etc. In this case, players are incentivised to occupy top positions and grab market share - which fosters rivalry.
According to Kilduff (2019) behavioral antecedents is a cause of rivalry. What are the 3 underlying factors for this creation of rivalry?
1) Similarity over time
2) repeated competition
3) evenly matched players
According to Kilduff (2019) behavioral antecedents is a cause of rivalry. One os the underlying factors for this rivalry creation is SIMILARITY OVER TIME. Explain briefly why this is?
Similarity over time of competitors entails that firms have a certain degree of commonality with regard to e.g., market position and product offering. Such commonality over time leads to increased social comparison pressures, which in turn fosters management’s psychological involvement in the rivalry - which may further spill over to the organizational culture.
According to Kilduff (2019) behavioral antecedents is a cause of rivalry. One os the underlying factors for this rivalry creation is REPEATED COMPETITION. Explain briefly why this is?
Repeated competition leads to the sustainability/ creation of rivalry. If players have been engaged in repeated competition over time, it created an increased incentive to outperform the rival.
According to Kilduff (2019) behavioral antecedents is a cause of rivalry. One os the underlying factors for this rivalry creation is when firms are EVENLY MATCHED. Explain briefly why this is?
When firms are currently or has for a longer period of time been evenly matched, this leads to increased rivalry intensity.
How does internationalization link to rivalry?
Internationalization can amplify the rivalry between firms. Rivals that compete in one market are very likely also competing as rivals in other geographical markets. The underlying reasoning for such patterns is that rivals are likely to imitate each others actions, e.g., in the context of market entry decisions in order to avoid the competitor establishing a overly strong position in that market.
What is meant by multipoint competition?
Multipoint competitions refers to when firms compete with each other in several markets at once.
This is typically a by-product of fierce competition, where rivals have market commonality in combination with resource similarity. Because the rival is aware, motivated and able to respond to attacs, they tend to follow each other into new markets.
What is Competitive Assymetry? Provide a practical example of this.
Competitive Assymetry refers to when competitors have assymetric perceptions of oneanother. Specifcially, each pair of companies have a unique and directional competitive relationship in terms of market commonality and resource similarity.
This can be well exemplified by Coca Cola and Harboe. Whilst Harboe views Coca Cola as its main competitor, this is not equivalent to CC’s perception of Harboe. Concurrently, the likelihood that CC will attack HB is different from the likelihood of HB will attack from CC. The same holds for likelihood of response.
Whilst there is large market commonality makes HB aware and motivated to respond, the low resource similarity is low, with CC having superior resources, reduces HB’s ability to respond to an attack.
Following is true about fierce competition:
A) it is only manifested if rivals have high market commonality and high resource similarity.
B) it can also be manifested if rivals have high market commonality but low resource similarity.
C) Harboe does not view Cocal Cola as a fierce competitor
D) resource similarity is a more important determinant for rivalry intensity than is market commonality
B) it can also be manifested if rivals have high market commonality but low resource similarity.
All other options are wrong.
A) wrong bc. B is right
C) Harboe view CC as fierce competitor, but CC does not view Harboe the same way
D) market commonality is a more important determinant for rivalry intensity than resource similarity is
Explain how market commonality and resource similarity affect competitive attack and response.
High market commonlity entails that the competitor is aware in the event of an attack, and is motivated to respond to the attack amid the same focus on markets of operation.
High resource similarity (e.g., by amount and type) makes a competitor able to respond to competitive attacks.
Explain the relationship between the likelihood of attack and likelihood of response. Give an example.
The likelihood of attack is inversely correlated with the likelihood of response of the competitor. That is, if the two competitors have high market commonality and high resource similarity, both firms will be aware, motivated and able to respond, making it less attractive for any of them to initiate an attack.
Example: Pepsi co. and Coca Cola will likely not find it attractive to attack each other, given high market comonality and resource similarity.
According to Chen & Stucker 1997, what are the 5 other factors affecting the likelihood of cross-border competitive attack?
1) global MNC strategy (as opposed to multi-domestic strategy)
2) wholly-owned subsidiaries (as opposed to licensing and franchising)
3) management with international experience
4) first-mover advantages
5) second-mover advantages