Internal Control Weaknesses Flashcards
“in her head then leaves” –> There is no indication that anyone is covering her duties and, given that all the information “is in her head”.
Implication :
1. FC holds key knowledge needed to make commercial decisions therefore without could cause business interruption.
- key tasks are not being performed which could have a severe impact on the company.
Recommendation:
1. Additional staff must be trained to cover work gaps upon absence.
- Before going on holiday, there must be an effective ‘handover’ of duties.
- A checklist of people’s key tasks should be produced.
- Back-up process documentation that explains how this task should be completed should be made available.
” No authorisation over employees using stock “
Spare parts are not formally booked-out from a depot’s central stores, with staff ‘helping themselves’ from the store.
Implication:
“Poor control of inventory will result in differences between the accounting records and actual stock levels.”
“items could be stolen for personal use”
Recommendation :
“Support vans should carry a minimum standard of inventory items which should be replaced on return to the main depot.”
“Stock should be issued by specific personnel within Central stores who must update the inventory system upon despatch – this could be managed by items being ‘scanned-out’ (thus requiring items to receive an identifying bar code upon receipt).”
Stock checks should be performed monthly (floor to sheet to prove completeness and sheet to floor to prove existence) and differences between physical and the system investigated.
“stock running out then reordering”
Purchasing manager only reorders after items have run out.
Implication:
“Stock items could run out without the system knowing or without informing management to reorder, with the result that the company will not be able to service customers”
Recommendation :
System should report on stock outs or be set to report when stock levels are low.
Penalties and disciplinary procedures should be imposed for staff not arranging for return of items to warehouse.
Manager not always available :
Depot manager must sign-off purchase requisition and there is a suggestion that he/she may not always be available.
Implication:
If the depot manager does not sign, there would be a further delay in ordering the stock.
Recommendation:
Another member of staff should be empowered to sign on Depot Manager’s behalf to cover for absence – this should be set out in an internal delegated authority.
Items received in warehouse not checked against order
Items received into the warehouse are checked against DN not against the original order.
Implication:
Items may be delivered that have not been ordered.
Incorrect items may have been delivered to those originally ordered.
Recommendation:
Copies of orders (system or hardcopy) should be made available to warehouse.
Warehouse should match all deliveries to open orders and reject anything without a supporting order.
The delivery note is sent to Head Office by post to create the related GRNI accrual.
Implication:
The delivery note could get lost in the post resulting in an understatement of liabilities.
Recommendation:
Each depot should keep suppliers’ delivery notes (or a copy) and create a Goods Received Note upon delivery. The GRN should be used to inform the accounting records of an inventory and liability update.
Upon receipt of a purchase invoice, the A/P ledger is updated directly rather than via the GRNI accrual (which is only being looked at annually) being reversed out.
Implication:
The GRNI accrual will likely become unmanageable if entries are not being matched to the related purchase invoices.
Recommendation:
Receipt of a purchase invoice should be matched to its relating GRNI accrual and an accounting entry used to reverse the accrual and account for the A/P.
Purchases are being accounted for twice.
Implication: If the double-entry is incorrect for the GRNI accrual and receipt of the purchase invoice, this could overstate liabilities and overcharge ‘purchases’ thus affecting Gross Margin.
Recommendation:
A monthly review of the GRNI accrual should be performed to ensure that
individual accruals are being reversed on a regular basis; and
old accruals are alerting the company to chasing-up invoices from suppliers
Suppliers are paid in the month in which purchase invoices are received rather than when they fall due.
The company may be paying invoices too early, thus losing-out on working capital cash-flow benefit of retaining cash until invoices are payable.
Recommendation
Accounting system should have a ‘prompt’ when an invoice is payable.
If prompt payment discounts are available, a report of all outstanding invoices could be produced on a ‘regular’ basis for manual authorisation of early payment.
There is a lack of segregation of duties within payroll as the payroll manager is responsible for setting-up employees as well making payments.
The payroll manager would be able to extract monies from the business by creating ghost/fictitious employees.
Separate individuals should be responsible for setting-up and making payments. Any amendments to the payroll system should be authorised by the Finance Director before payroll is transmitted.
Expenses are not being recorded against specific ‘jobs’ and being coded as ‘general expenses’ and then allocated-out as a HO overhead.
The ‘true’ profitability of each job is not being recorded correctly resulting in a potential loss on each job.
Recommendation
Expenses pertaining to individual jobs should be assigned the individual job code to which all costs (and revenue) should be allocated.
Expense total is approved without supporting detail if total claim is within a certain tolerable range.
Finance Director would be unable to verify who is claiming what and whether these claims were bogus and/or inconsistent with company policy.
Recommendation
Supporting documentation should provide the composition of the totals being paid.
The FD should perform sample checks of individual items, going back to physical expense claims to verify validity.
Work can be performed for new customers without credit checks made.
Risk that company is selling to customers who are not credit-worthy and therefore increasing the risk of debt default.
Customers should pay a deposit (or full payment) upon calling the 24 hour line. This could be in the form of a credit card payment at point of call.
(as credit check may not be possible in emergency circumstances)
No employee references
Implication: New employees may not possess the
appropriate skills for the role. They may lack integrity, have a criminal record or may have falsified information about past roles, their identity or qualifications. Such issues could lead to errors or losses and may result in requirements for additional training and staff development. In some instances Ludwig may be legally exposed.
Recommendation:
References from past employers should be requested and followed up for all prospective employees. All offers of employment should be made subject to satisfactory references being received.
Office equipment authorisation - purchasing office equipment
Implication :
Unnecessary or duplicate expenditure may be incurred or assets may be purchased which do not benefit Ludwig. Assets may also be purchased that are sub-optimal both in terms of quality and price. The lack of authorisation leaves Ludwig exposed to the possibility of fraudulent expenditure and theft by employees. High volumes of unauthorised expenditure could leave the
company financially overcommitted and assets may not be appropriately recorded.
Recommendation :
Company policy over authorisation for capital expenditure should be re-communicated to all employees.
Disciplinary action should be taken against those employees who fail to adhere to company policy. Segregation of duties between those responsible for
ordering and those receiving ordered items should be put into place.
A regular comparison of capital expenditure against budget should be made and any significant variances investigated.
For high value purchases two directors should be required to sign the authorisation and the authorisation limit should be lowered to, for example, £10,000.
Orders accepted despite no checking of inventory levels & credit checks
Implication :
Orders may be accepted for goods which are not currently in inventory leading to delays in fulfilling customers’ orders and a loss of customer goodwill.
Orders may be accepted from customers who have exceeded their credit limit leading to an increased risk of bad debts or slow payment.
Recommendation:
Inventory levels and available credit limits must be checked before an order is accepted over the telephone.
This could be achieved through IT controls in the sales order system which require such checks to be performed before orders can be processed.
Checks on credit limits should also take account of the value of the current order.
The warehouse manager should report any instances of “stock outs” to the sales manager as this would indicate that inventory quantities have not been checked by sales staff or that any IT controls had been overridden.
A regular review of receivables balances against credit limits should be carried out to identify any balances exceeding the credit limit.
No centralised control of preferred suppliers
Consequences
Asulu may not achieve best prices or maximise discounts available for larger purchase volumes
Best quality may not be obtained/inconsistent quality across branches
Recommendation
Undertake a review of all suppliers; negotiate contracts with preferred suppliers for the wholebusiness and issue a list of suppliers for use by each outlet.
No controls over amount of ingredients ordered within each outlet/no one individual responsible for ordering at each outlet/many employees ordering
Consequences
Items running low on quantity may be ordered by more than one employee resulting in wastage.
Items running low on quantity may not be ordered at all resulting in lost sales
Increased risk of ordering items for personal use
Recommendation
Designate one/two employees to be responsible for ordering at each outlet
Introduce a process for notifying the employee responsible when items are running low
Orders to be approved by supervisor/manager
No records of items ordered by phone maintained, orders are placed with suppliers haphazardly throughout the day
Consequences
Staff may forget whether items required have been ordered or not, resulting in over or underordering.
Suppliers may be called more than once in any day leading to increased risk of errors
Lack of records means goods delivered cannot be checked against those orders– goods delivered may not be those required/incorrect quantities
Goods ordered may not be delivered at all – lost sales and loss of customer goodwill
Recommendation
Document details of order e.g. use pre-printed order pad for completion when orders are placed
Telephone (or email) suppliers once a day, with full order list
On receipt of goods check delivery note to record of order for correctness of goods delivered
Order records checked daily for non-delivery of goods ordered
No check of goods delivered to delivery note
Consequence
Items delivered may not agree to items recorded on delivery note – this could lead to Asulu being overcharged for items not received/incorrect quantities/incorrect items
Recommendation
Asulu staff should unpack delivery and agree type and quantity of items to delivery note before signing