Internal Control Flashcards
How does the auditor assess the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements whether due to error or fraud and for designing the nature, timing, and exetent of further audit procedures?
By obtaining a sufficient understanding of the entity and the environment, including its internal control.
What are the objectives of internal controls and which one is the primary interest of the outside auditor?
Accurate & reliable financial reporting <– primary interest
Compliance with laws and regulations
Effectiveness and efficiency of operations
(ACE)
5 Components of Internal Control under the COSO Framework
- Control activities (PIPS)
- Risk Assessment by the entity
- Information Systems and Communication
- Monitoring
- Control Environment (CHOPPER)
(CRIME)
What control activities is the auditor interested in?
Whether the management does:
- Performance Reviews - CRAFT
- Information processing - general vs. application controls
- Physical controls - access to assets
- Segregation of Duties (ARCCS)
(PIPS) for C in CRIME
What does an entity’s risk assessment for financial reporting purposes focus on and what factors does the risk assessment include?
Focuses on the identification, analysis, and management of risks relevant to the preparation of F/S that are fairly presented in conformormity with GAAP
Includes risks that affect the entity’s ability to properly record, process, summarize, and report financial data.
Include external and internal factors such as:
- changes in opeations
- new personnel
- new/upgraded IT
- rapid growth, new technology
- new lines of business, products or activities
- restructurings
- foreign operations
- accounting pronouncements
NOTE: Risk Assessments are NOT_ _the same activities as Monitoring. They are two distinct activities. Do not confuse the two.
An entity’s ongoing monitoring activities often include
- Periodic audits by the audit committee
- Reviewing the purchasing function
- The audit of the annual financial statements
- Control risk assessment in conjunction with quarterly reviews
Reviewing the purchasing function
Audit committees do not do periodic audits. Audit committees hire external auditor to do these audits. Same for annaul financial statements.
Control risk assessment has nothing to do with ongoing monitoring activities. They are two distinct activities: CRIME
What elements or factors should the auditor look for when obtaining an understanding of an entity’s internal control structure?
What techniques or procedures can the auditor use for obtaining the understanding to assess control risk?
CRIME + PIIO
NOTE: P = Prior Audits
What is management’s objective of monitoring controls?
Because management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control, management monitors controls to ensure that they are operating as intended and that they are modified as appropriate for changes in conditions.
How are an entity’s risk assessment and monitoring activities different?
An entity’s risk assessment = process that identifies, analyzes, and manage risks relevant to the preparation of F/S that are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP.
Monitoriting = a process that assessess the quality of internal control performance over time.
What does an entity’s information system consists of?
Methods and records used to record, process, summarize, and report the company’s transactions and to maintain accountability for the related accounts.
What are the control factors in an organization’s environment?
Commitment to competence
Human resource policies & practices that enforce training of employees and new hires
Organizational structure - the simpler, the easier to DIM the I/C
Participation of those charged with Governance - audit committee actively monitors the internal audit function*
Philosophy of management & operating style - tone at the top
Ethical values & integrity
Responsibility is assigned to different employees to ensure segregation of duties
CHOPPER
*Note - audit committee does not do the audits them selves. They check in with the internal audit to put pressure on management to be more attentive.
What steps does the auditor take to obtain an understanding of the internal control structure?
- Perform risk assessment procedures (CRIME + PIIO): What controls are implemented?
- Document the understanding of I/C through FIND
- Assess the RMM to decide whether the controls are expected to operate effectively
- Perform Test of Controls on the controls that are implemented to see if they are operating effectively (test the cycles for ARCC’s by doing RIIO)
- Reassess RMM to determine DR - to decide how much substanative testing to do
- Document conclusions
When can an auditor avoid testing a control?
- When the control is expected to not operate effectively because control appears to be inadequate/ ineffective / weak (Control Risk is at Maximum)
- performing the substanative procedures is more cost effective than performing test of controls (cost of ToC < Benefit)
This is the SUBSTANTIVE approach
Can the auditor skip substantive testing if a control appears to be effective?
NO, the auditor still has to perform substantive testing in conjunction with the test of controls. All the auditor has to do is decrease the scope of the substanative procedures, not eliminate these procedures. This is the COMBINED approach.
No audit is ever performed without any substantive testting of details. Therefore, we never, ever eliminate substanative testing from our aduit.
What is the objective of a test of control?
To evaluate the operating effectiveness of a control after the auditor’s risk assessment presumes the control to be effective.
What is the difference between risk assessment procedures on the entity’s internal control structure and a test on the entity’s internal control?
Risk assessment procedures on the entity’s internal control structure = aids the auditor in evaluating whether the control has been suitably designed and implemented
(the control actually exists and presumed to work)
Test of control = aids the auditor in whether the control is operating effectively and is only done after risk assessment shows the control was implemented.
(the control actually works or fails)
Techniques for documenting the auditor’s understanding of internal control.
Flowchart - visual depcition of the structure
Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ) - Each question is deisnged to identify a potentially useful I/C element that might be relied upon if it is operating effectively. (MOST popular b/c most structured and esaiest for inexperienced auditors to use)
Narrative or Memorandum - detailed written description of the structure
Decision table/tree - depicts the logic of an operation or process, uses Yes/No questions, ad hoc queries, LIMITED use, need to use in conjunction with other documentation
FIND
What is the benefit of obtaining an understanding of an entity’s internal control structure and what is the auditor primarly focused on?
To identify which controls to rely on in order to reduce the risk of misstatements (Control Risk) and ultimately, reduce substantive testing.
Auditor is primarly focused on identifying those controls that are implemented while obtaining this understanding of the internal control structure.
(Operating effectiveness of the control comes after the understanding.)
Can a test of details be performed as a test of a control? Why or why not?
YES, because the test of details evaluates whether a control operated effectively because:
- if the test of details shows the account balance is correct, this indicates the controls must be operating effectively.
(Balance is correct = control is working)
- If the test of details shows the account balance is misstated, then indicates the controls are not operating effectively as they should be.
(Balance is misstated = control failed)
The objective of tests of details of transactions performed as tests of controls is to
- Monitor the design and use of entity documents such as prenumbered shipping forms.
- Determine whether internal controls have been implemented.
- Detect material misstatements in the account balances of the financial statements.
- Evaluate whether internal controls operated effectively.
Evaluate whether internal controls operated effectively.
Recall that tests of details of transactions examine the actual amounts and if tests of details show that the transactions’ amounts are misstated, then it shows the control is not working as expected. Conversely, if the amounts are correct, then it shows the control operated effectively as expected.