Internal Control Flashcards
The primary objective of procedures performed to obtain an understanding of the internal control structure is to provide an auditor with
the knowledge necessary for audit planning.
Auditor uses the assessed level of control risk (the risk that the internal control structure will not detect or prevent a material misstatement) to
determine the acceptable level of detection risk for financial statement assertions.
The auditor assesses control risk (the risk that the internal control structure will not prevent or detect a material misstatement) and inherent risk (the risk of a material misstatement occurring) in order to determine the acceptable level of detection risk.
The auditor tests controls in order to rely on them and to reduce substantive testing
If testing controls will not reduce substantive testing efficiently the auditor won’t perform test of controls.
In obtaining an understanding of an entity’s internal control structure, an auditor is required to obtain knowledge about the
Design of policies and procedures, the auditor is NOT required to determine operating effectiveness of controls by testing controls unless control risk is assessed at below the maximum level. An assessment of control risk below maximum must be supported by the collection of evidence indicating the controls are operating effectively. An assessment of control risk at maximum does not require the collection of evidence about the operation of the controls; however, it does require documentation of the basis for the assessment at maximum. Control risk may be assessed at the maximum level for certain assertions because the auditor believes that evaluating the effectiveness of the controls would be inefficient.
On the basis of audit evidence gathered and evaluated, an auditor decides to increase the assessed level of control risk from that originally planned. To achieve an overall audit risk level that is substantially the same as the planned audit risk level, the auditor would
Decrease detection risk and increase substantive tests in order to achieve the planned audit risk level.
inherent limitation of the potential effectiveness of an entity’s internal control structure?
fallibility of human judgement, and performance, possibility of collusion, management override
After obtaining an understanding of the internal control structure and assessing control risk, an auditor decided not to perform additional tests of controls.
The performance of additional tests of controls would be performed only if such performance were considered cost-beneficial.
In assessing control risk, an auditor ordinarily selects from a variety of techniques, including
Tests of controls directed toward effectiveness or operation of a control would ordinarily include inquiries, inspections of documents, observation, and reperformance of the application of a control.
When considering the internal control structure, an auditor should be aware of the concept of reasonable assurance, which recognizes that
The cost of an entity’s internal control structure should not exceed the benefits expected to be derived. Internal control can provide only reasonable assurance as a limiting factor is the cost/benefit ratio. The cost of an entity’s internal control should not exceed the benefits derived therefrom.
Regardless of the assessed level of control risk, an auditor would perform some
Substantive tests to restrict detection risk for significant transaction classes. An auditor must always perform substantive tests for significant account balances and transaction classes. Although a lowered control risk assessment allows the auditor to reduce substantive testing, it cannot be used to eliminate substantive testing.
A letter issued regarding significant deficiencies relating to an entity’s internal control observed during an audit of financial statements should include a
Restriction on the distribution of the report. The letters are intended solely for the use of the audit committee (or those charged with governance), management, and others within the organization.
When considering the objectivity of internal auditors, an independent auditor should
Determine the organizational level to which the internal auditors report. In assessing the objectivity of internal auditors, an independent auditor would consider the organizational status and reporting structure of the department as well as policies established to maintain objectivity.
This would include determining the organizational level to which the internal auditors report.
Sound internal control procedures dictate that, immediately upon receiving checks from customers by mail, a responsible employee should
Prepare a duplicate listing of checks received. The greatest risk for checks received in the mail is the risk of such checks being lost or misappropriated. Sound internal control, therefore, dictates the preparation of a listing of checks received as soon as possible.
An auditor would consider a cashier’s job description to contain compatible duties if the cashier receives remittances from the mailroom and also prepares the
Daily deposit slip. Adequate segregation of duties provides for the separation of authorizing, recording, and custodial duties. Receiving remittances from the mailroom is a custodial duty. It may properly be combined with preparation of the daily deposit slip which would also require custody of the asset.
An auditor would be most likely to limit substantive audit tests of sales transactions when control risk is assessed as low for the existence or occurrence assertion concerning sales transactions and the auditor has already gathered evidence supporting
Cash receipts and accounts receivable.
Substantive tests of sales transactions would be limited when control risk is assessed as low for existence/occurrence and evidence has been gathered supporting cash receipts and accounts receivable. Consider the accounts which are impacted by sales transactions, DR Cash or Accounts Receivable and CR Sales. The combination of low control risk in this area plus evidence supporting cash receipts and accounts receivable provides the auditor with assurance that sales transactions have actually occurred.
In a well-designed internal control structure, employees in the same department most likely would approve purchase orders, and also
Negotiate terms with vendors. Approval of purchase orders and negotiation of terms with vendors are both authorization functions which are properly performed by employees in the purchasing department.
Mailing disbursement checks and remittance advices should be controlled by the employee who
Signs the checks last.
The check signer should also be responsible for mailing disbursement checks and remittance advices as these are all custodial functions.
An auditor wishes to perform tests of controls on a client’s cash disbursements procedures. If the control procedures leave no audit trail of documentary evidence, the auditor will be most likely to test the procedures by
Observation and inquiry.
When documentation of a control does not exist, the auditor may use observation and inquiry to test the procedure.
An auditor’s primary consideration regarding an entity’s internal control structure policies and procedures is whether they
Affect the financial statement assertions.
The auditor is primarily interested in whether an entity’s internal controls affect the financial statement assertions. Specifically, the auditor is interested in the policies and procedures that pertain to an entity’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data consistent with the assertions embodied in the financial statements.
The ultimate purpose of assessing control risk is to contribute to the auditor’s evaluation of the
Risk that material misstatements exist in the financial statements.
The ultimate purpose of assessing control risk is to contribute to the auditor’s evaluation of the risk that material misstatements exist in the financial statements. Assessing control risk and inherent risk help the auditor identify where misstatements might exist; the auditor then performs auditing procedures to detect those misstatements.