Interm remedies, injunctions, security for costs (W10) Flashcards
CPR 25.2 - Time when an order for an interim remedy may be made
(1) An order for an interim remedy may be made at any time, including–
(a) before proceedings are started; and
(b) after judgment has been given.
(2) However–
(a) this is subject to any rule/PD/enactment which provides otherwise
(b) the court may grant an interim remedy before a claim has been made only if–
(i) the matter is urgent; or
(ii) it is otherwise desirable to do so in the interests of justice and
(c) unless the court otherwise orders, a defendant may not apply for any of the orders listed in CPR 25.1(1) before he has filed either an acknowledgment of service or defence.
(3) Where it grants an interim remedy before a claim has been commenced, the court should give directions requiring a claim to be commenced.
(4) In particular, the court need not direct that a claim be commenced where the application is made under s.33 Senior Courts Act 1981 or s.52 County Court Act 1984 (order for disclosure, inspection etc before commencement of a claim)
CPR 25.3 - How to apply for an interim remedy
(1) The court may grant an interim remedy on an application made without notice if it appears to the court that there are good reasons for not giving notice.
(2) An application for an interim remedy must be supported by evidence unless the court orders otherwise.
(3) If the applicant makes an application without giving notice, the evidence in support of the application must state the reasons why notice has not been given.
25APD.4 - Urgent applications and applications without notice
- Two categories:
(1) Applications where a claim form has already been issued
(2) Applications where a claim form has not yet been issued.
In both cases, where notice has not been given to the respondent. - Normally dealt with at a court hearing but cases of extreme urgency can be dealt with by telephone.
- Applications dealt with at a court hearing after issue of a claim form:
(1) application notice, evidence in support and a draft order should be filed with the court 2 hours before the hearing wherever possible;
(2) if an application is made before notice has been issued, a draft order should be provided at the hearing, and the application notice and evidence in support must be filed with the court on the same or next working day or as ordered by the court; and
(3) except in cases where secrecy is essential, the applicant should take steps to notify the respondent informally of the application. - Applications made before the issue of a claim form:
(1) Unless the court orders otherwise, either the applicant must undertake to the court to issue a claim form immediately or the court will give directions for the commencement of the claim;
(2) where possible the claim form should be served with the order for the injunction;
(3) an order made before the issue of a claim form should state in the title after the names of the applicant and respondent “the Claimant and Defendant in an Intended Action.” - Applications made by telephone:
(1) when it is not possible to arrange a hearing, application can be made between 10am and 5pm weekdays by telephoning the Royal Court of Justice and asking to be put in contact with a High Court judge of the appropriate Division. In County Court proceedings, the appropriate County Court hearing centre should be contacted.
(2) where an application is made outside those hours the applicant should either–
(a) telephone the Royal Court of Justice where he will be put in contact with the clerk to the appropriate duty judge in the High Court;
(b) the Urgent Court Business Officer of the appropriate Circuit who will contact the local duty judge;
(3) where the facility is available, the judge will likely require a draft order to be faxed to him,
(4) the application notice and evidence in support must be filed with the court on the same or next working day, together with two copies of the order for sealing,
(5) injunctions will be heard by telephone only where the applicant is acting by counsel or solicitors.
25APD.5 - Orders for injunctions
- An order for an injunction, unless the court orders otherwise, must contain:
(1) an undertaking by the applicant to the court to pay any damages which the respondent sustains which the court considers the applicant should pay,
(2) if made without notice to any other party, an undertaking by the applicant to the court to serve on the respondent the application notice, evidence in support and any order made asap,
(3) if made without notice to any other party, a return date for a further hearing at which the party can be present,
(4) if made before filing the application notice, an undertaking to file and pay the appropriate fee on the same or next working day, and
(5) if made before issue of a claim form–
(a) an undertaking to issue and pay the appropriate fee on the same or next working day, or
(b) directions for the commencement of the claim. - An order for an injunction made in the presence of all parties to be bound by it or made at a hearing of which they have had notice, may state that it is effective until trial or further order.
- An order for an injunction must set out clearly what the respondent must do or not do.
CPR 25.3.2 - Notice
- Widespread use of mobile devices makes it unlikely that there will ever be a practical reason why an applicant should not at least give informal notice to a respondent.
- the applicant should take steps to notify the respondent informally of the application.
- if the applicant makes an application without giving notice, evidence in support of the application must state the reasons why notice was not given.
- the court should not entertain an application of which no notice has been given unless either giving notice would enable the defendant to take steps to defeat the purpose of the injunction or there has been literally no time to give notice before the injunction is required.
CPR 25.3.3 - Evidence
- An application for an interim remedy must be supported by evidence unless the court orders otherwise.
- General rule is that evidence at hearings other than trial is to be by witness statement.
- However, parties may, if they wish, rely solely on the matters set out in (a) their statement of case or (b) their application, provided they are verified by a statement of truth.
CPR 25.3.4 - Interim remedy order hearings in private
- General rule: hearing will be in public
- May be appropriate to be in private if publicity would defeat the object of the hearing, that it is on application without notice and it would be unjust to the respondent for it to be public, that it involves confidential information and publicity would damage that confidentiality.
- Court has an inherent power to order that information should not be disclosed.
CPR 25.3.5 - Applicant’s disclosure duties where application is made without notice
- To grant an interim remedy in the form of an injunction without notice is ‘to grant an exceptional remedy’
- On all applications without notice, it is the duty of the applicant to make full and frank disclosure of all matters relevant to the application; this includes all matters of fact and law which are or may be adverse to the applicant.
CPR 25.3.5.1 - Applicant’s disclosure duties where application made on short notice
- An application notice must be served as soon as practicable after it is filed and must be served at least 3 days before the court is to deal with the application.
- Where a respondent is given ‘short notice’ of an application, it cannot be expected that he will be properly prepared and able to put all relevant factual and legal information before the court.
- Therefore, the applicant is not released from their duty for full and frank disclosure even on short notice.
- However, there is no duty for the applicant to provide duplicate information where the respondent deals with it.
CPR 25.3.6 - Discharge of injunction for material non-disclosure
- In an interim injunction case, if the duty of full and fair disclosure is not observed, the court may discharge the injunction, even if the injunction was rightly imposed.
- It is no excuse for an applicant to say that they were not aware of the importance of the matters they omitted to state.
- In deciding the consequences of any such breach, the court must take account of all relevant circumstances, including the gravity of the breach, the explanation offered, and the severity and duration of prejudice caused. It would only be in exceptional circumstances that the court would not discharge the order.
CPR 25.3.7 - Applications to set aside for material non-disclosure not to be made without proper reason
Increasing tendency of litigations against whom interim injunctions have been granted to ‘allege material non-disclosure on rather slender grounds.’ Judges will be alert to this.
CPR 25.3.8 - Discharge and re-grant of an injunction
- Where serious and culpable non-disclosure sufficient to result in the court discharging an injunction granted without notice has been established, the question whether a fresh injunction should be granted is likely to arise.
- If justice requires that a fresh injunction should be granted to protect the applicant from harm, it might be thought unjust to refuse it on the grounds of non-disclosure.
- However, in the event of any substantial breach, the court strongly inclines towards setting its order aside and not renewing it, so as to deprive the defaulting party of any advantage that the order may have given them.
CPR 25.12 - Security for costs
(1) A defendant to any claim may apply under this section for security for his costs of the proceedings.
(2) An application for security for costs must be supported by written evidence.
(3) Where the court makes an order for security for costs, it will-
(a) determine the amount of security; and
(b) direct–
(i) the manner in which; and
(ii) the time within which
the security must be given.
CPR 25.13 - Conditions to be satisfied
(1) The court may make an order for security for costs under CPR 25.12 if–
(a) it is satisfied, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, that it is just to make such an order; and
(b) (i) one or more of the conditions in paragraph (2) applies; or
(ii) an enactment permits the court to require security for costs.
(2) The conditions are–
(a) the claimant is–
(i) resident out of the jurisdiction; but
(ii) not resident in a State bound by the 2005 Hague Convention
(c) the claimant is a company or other body and there is reason to believe that it will be unable to pay the defendant’s costs if ordered to do so;
(d) the claimant has changed his address since the claim was commenced with a view to evading the consequences of litigation;
(e) the claimant failed to give his address in the claim form or give a correct address in that form;
(f) the claimant is acting as a nominal claimant, other than as a representative claimant, and there is reason to believe he will be unable to pay the defendant’s costs if ordered to do so;
(g) the claimant has taken steps in relation to his assets that would make it difficult to enforce an order for costs against him.
CPR 25.13.1 - Discretionary power to order security for costs
- Two pre-requisities: (i) having regard to all the circumstances, it is just to make an order and (ii) one or more of the conditions applies, or an enactment permits the court to require security for costs.
- A circumstance of increasing importance is the ability of the respondent to comply with any order made.
- Another matter for consideration is the likelihood of the respondent’s claim succeeding.
- Parties however should not attempt to go into the merits of the case unless it can be clearly demonstrated that there is a high degree of probability of success or failure.
- A claimant will not be required to provide security for costs where, at the time of the application, the claim appears highly likely to succeed.
- An order is unlikely to be refused on the basis that the defendants are wealthy enough to survive without such protection, or are protected by some other means.
- It will ordinarily be just to order security unless the claimant can show that to do so would stifle the claim. They bear the burden on the balance of probabilities. They will need to show that they cannot provide security and they cannot obtain appropriate assistance to do so.