Interlocutory prohobitory injunctions Flashcards

1
Q

Principles

A

Inadequacy of damages
Conduct of the parties
Laches and Acquiescence
Effect on 3rd parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Laches and Acquicense

A

Newport Association Football Club (1995) ER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Effect on 3rd parties

A

Howard v OPW (1993) IR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Test for an Interlocutory Injunction

A

American Cyanamid v Ethicon (1975) AC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Irish test for an Interlocutory Injunction

A

Campus Oil v Minister for Industry & Energy (1983) IR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Damages were an adequate remedy

A

Osmond Ire v Fergal Mc Farland (2010) IEHC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Damages weren’t an adequate remedy

A

Reid & Turner v HSE (2010) IEHC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reid v Turner v HSE (2010) IEHC

A

Lynch & Ors v HSE (2010) IEHC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

no bona fide question
Damages would have been an adequate remedy

A

Moylist Construction v Thomas Doheny & Ors (2010) IEHC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Circumstances where departure from Campus Oil is justified

A
  • where there is an arguable defence
  • where the injunction is sought in context of a trade dispute
  • where proceedings are sought for Defamation
  • where the trial of the action is unlikely
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly