interferometry and coherence Flashcards

1
Q

drawbacks to total power telescopes

A

the stability of high-gain electronics:

even if Tsys»Tsource, it’s easy to pick out Tsource if the system is stable

but the gain can fluctuate ((eg due to temp variations)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 solutions to overcome the drawbacks of total power telescope

A
  1. beam chopping
  2. use an interferometer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

beam chopping

A

move the antenna rapidly on and off the source, faster than Tsys is changing and measure the difference

Tsource=Ton-Toff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

simple 2-element interferometer starting point

A

1D young slits
take a point source at infinity, illuminating the slits at an anlge a to the normal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

a point source of flux density s will produce

A

the familiar cos^2 fringe pattern on a distance screen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

if an extended source is incoherent (different parts of source radiate independently and can’t interfere) we can just

A

add the fringe intensities from each part of the source

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

van cittert-zernike theorem

A

the complex fringe visibility is the fourier transform of the normalised sky brightness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

from the van cittert-zernike theorem, you can recover the sky brightness from

A

measurements of the complex fringe visibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

do we need to actually make fringes to measure the complex fringe pattern

A

no-
think of two emerging signals
to compute the fringe pattern, introduce a phase delay corresponding to an angle and add up the waves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

the complex fringe visibility can be computed directly from

A

the average (conjugate) product of the signals received by the two antennas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

interferometry - what to do practically (in 1 dimension) steps

A
  1. get two antennas a distance y apart
  2. measure two noise voltages (these are measures of the electric fields)
  3. determine the mean product
  4. repeat for different values of y
  5. compute sky brightness using fourier transform
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

the fourier transform relationship can be extended

A

to two dimensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

truncating the complex fringe visibility measurements at some maximum baseline level is the equivalent of

A

smoothing (convolving) B with a function of width

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the angular resolution of the interferometer is

A

lambda/rmax

like a dish of width rmax

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why are interferometers relatively insensitive to changes in gain and Tsys

A

because <V1>=<V2>=0 so no large offsets in the system and measurements of <V1V2*> are not affected by small gain variations</V2></V1>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is <v1v2*> a measure of

A

spacial coherence of the radiation

(the similarity between the field at two spatially separated points)

17
Q

what is spatial coherence proportional to

A

correlation coefficient between v1 and v2

as a result, this act of multiplicaiton (<v1v2*>) is called correlation

18
Q

how do you perform the correlation

A

there are several ways, both analogue and digital but the digital correlator is the most common and the most flexible

19
Q

digital correlator - the signal form the antennas are noise-like so

A

even a simple 1-bit digitisation of v1(t) and v2(t) can be sufficient

20
Q

what does a simple 1-bit digitiation give

A

tow bitstreams of 1s and 0s

21
Q

EXNOR gate

A

0 1 =0
1 0 =0
0 0 =1
1 1 =1
(same =1, different=0)

22
Q

1-bit digitisation is efficient in terms of

23
Q

1-bit digitisation con

A

loses some sensitivity and higher bit levels (eg 8-bit) are preferred when possible

24
Q

correlating interferometer: the phase difference between the two signals is

A

the phase of the complex fringe visibility

25
Q

correlating interferometer: if we can measure phase to pi/4, we can measure alpha to

A

1/8 lambda/D

26
Q

correlating interferometer: angular resolution is

A

lambda/D or slightly better

27
Q

for very high resolutions (D>100km) we need

A

Very Long Baseline Interferometry

28
Q

what is VLBI

A

same as collerating interferometer but:

two antennas totally isolated from each other

separate local oscillators. timing done with clocks

signals are recorded onto local disk packs

recordings are replayed later into the correlator

29
Q

requirements for VLBI

A

suitable only for very compact sources, otherwise fringe visibility will tend to zero

30
Q

if the source has been resolved on a baseline, there will be

A

no correlated flux to measure

31
Q

for VLBI, what sources do we require

A

generally: compact, high surface brightness sources such as quasars, radiogalaxy cores and pulsars

32
Q

timekeeping requirement for VLBI

A

if the signal bandwidth is delta v, then its coherence time is 1/delta v

recordings must be time-synchronised

33
Q

coherence time

A

roughly the time over which it has a well-defined pahse

34
Q

the global navigation satellite systems gives the time requirement to be

A

better than 1 micro second

35
Q

we need to integrate for a time T before fringes are strong enough to see so

A

the correlated phase must not wander on timescales<T

36
Q

fractional stability of the oscillatir

A

delta t /T

37
Q

to enshre delta phi «2pi, we can only integrate for

A

T&laquo_space;1/v 1/fractional stability