Interference w/advantage relations, abuse of legal proceedings, alienation of affection and related claims Flashcards
Torts - Interference w/ advantageous relations - Elements
- Worngull and officious intermeedling
- On expectancies
- From valid contractual obligation
Torts - Interference w/advantage relations - Types (2)
- Interference with contract or business expectancy
- Product diparagement, trade libel or injourious falsehood
Torts - Interference w/ advantageous relations - Interference w/contract or business expectancy / what, reqs (3)
Inducement to disrupte or breach contract with P
- inducement conduct is enough - breach doesnt necessarily has to happen
- Bona Fide contract must exist or expectancy be reasonably certain
- D must have knoweldge of contract/expectancy and intention to induce interference
- D must play active role in disruption or breach by improper means - Offer mor emoney isnot enough
i.e. CPA induce client to fire lawyer w/o justification
Torts - Interference w/ advantageous relations - Interference w/contract or business expectancy - DX RUle
P to prove actual dx suffered
Torts - Interference w/ advantageous relations - Interference w/contract or business expectancy - DEFENSES
- Justifiable proper/legitimate conduct under circumstances
- i.e. business competition
- If made w/prospective advantage is OK unless it is not illegal
Torts - Interference w/ advantageous relations - Product Disparagement, trade libel or injurious falsehood / elements (3)
- Publicized false statement
- To 3rd parties
- Disparages or casts doubt upon reliaibility or quality of competitor’s business/prduct/service
Torts - Interference w/ advantageous relations - Product Disparagement, trade libel or injurious falsehood / DX Rule
Must show actual DX
- economic loss - i.e. decreas ein sales
Torts - Interference w/ advantageous relations - Product Disparagement, trade libel or injurious falsehood / Privileges-Defenses (3)
- Actual comparison of products
- Mild puffery,sales talks
- Defamation defenses TEMPR (truth, consent, mere opinion, privileges, retraction)
Torts - Abuse of Legal Proceedings - Types (4)
- Malicious Criminal Prosecution
- Wrongful Civil Proceeding
- Slander of Title by use of civil procedure
- Gral abuse of process as wrongful use
Torts - Abuse of Legal Proceedings - Malicious Criminal Prosecution - what, reqs
D’s unjstified intitiaiton of criminal proceeding that erminated in favor of P, when:
- Absence of probable cause + P acquited on the merits
- With Malice where only intention is subject P to justice
[P entitled to nominal dx]
Torts - Abuse of Legal Proceedings - Malicious Criminal Prosecution - Privileges
Absolut for judge, prosecutor, police
Torts - Abuse of Legal Proceedings - Worngful Civil Procedure / what, proof of dx
As with criminal, D’s unjustified initiation of proceeding that terminates on the merits in favour of P
- No probable cause analysis hence it is necessary to prove special dx
Torts - Abuse of Legal Proceedings - Slander of title by use of civil process / what
D slander title of P by using legal process
- i.e. file litis pendens, attach liens, levy of execution, etc.
Prima facie is privileged action UNLESS ABUSE when Bad Faith or malicious intent to tie up property
Torts - Abuse of Legal Proceedings - Slander of title by use of civil process / Dx Special Rule when blocking sale or purchase
P entitled to dx and legal fees necessary to clear title
Torts - Abuse of Legal Proceedings - Gral Abuse of Process / what
Worngful use of legal process for ulterior purpose not related with legal claim pursuit
- ie. issue of W deposition notice to execute service of process for different proceeding