Interest to create legal relations Flashcards
Balfour v Balfour
POL- agreements of a couple living together in one household will not have intention
Merrit v Merrit
POL- parties had seperated therefore the intention was presumed
Jones v Padavatton
mother gave allowance to kid, to give up job , bought her a house, mother seeks repossession , second agreement was not contractual as no intent
Simpinks v Pay
POL- if money exchanged it is usually legally binding
- Lodger and 2 members enter competition in lodgers name, paying equal share of entry , entitled to share the winnings
Parker v Clarke
young couple sell house, move into older couples house, would inherit in death, fell out and young couple asked to leave , giving up house indicated legally binding.
Wilson
Agreement to share lottery winnings between friends was giving intention
Rose v Frank
POL-commercial presumption can ony be rebutted with express terms
Sadler v Reynolds
POL- if the agreement falls between commercial and social , the onus is on the C to prove it was intention to create legal relations
Edwards v Skyways
commercial, attempt to avoid making ex gratia payments failed
Esso petroleum v C&E
POL- offer of free gifts to promote business can be legally binding , world cup coins with every gallon of petrol
Jones v Vernon pools
clause saying no legal relation upheld when the company lost his winning coupon
Klienwort Benson v Malaysian mining
comfort letters do not give rise to a legal obligation
- letters stating intention to ensure they did not run out of the funds was no guarantee