Intentions To Create Legal Relations Flashcards

1
Q

If an agreement is made in a business seeking what is presumed

A

If the agreement is made in a business setting, the courts start by presuming that the agreement was intended to be legally binding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How can the parties rebut the presumption business setting

A

However, the parties can rebut the presumption by making it clear that the agreement is not intended to be a contract: ROSE AND FRANK CO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What words imply a agreement was not meant to be a contract

A

Using the words ‘binding in honour only’ means that the agreement is not intended to be a contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What can be promised to intend a contract

A

Where gifts or prizes are promised it is presumed that the parties intended to form a contract. This is because the purpose is generally to promote the commercial interests of the party offering the gift or prizes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Where the agreement is a domestic one what are the presumption

A

Where the agreement is a domestic one, the courts start by presuming that it was not intended to be legally binding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is the agreement rebuttable

A

The presumption is rebuttable, so if it can be proved that the agreement was intended to be legally binding then it will be a contract.
Certainty of terms and seriousness of the subject matter are important :MERRITT v MERRITT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the presumption of a social agreement

A

The presumption that social agreements are not intended to create legal relations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How can a social agreements be rebuttable

A

If it can be proved that the agreement was intended to be legally binding it will be a contract. Evidence that money had changed hands would be one way to rebut the presumption: SIMPKINS V PAYS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly