Intentional Torts to Persons Flashcards

1
Q

what are the two elements of battery (in addition to intent/causation)?

A

1) harmful or offensive contact, and
2) contact must be with the plaintiff’s person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is “harmful” contact?

A

contact that causes actual injury, pain, disfigurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is “offensive” contact?

A

contact that is considered offensive to a reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

true or false: battery can be satisfied with indirect contact.

A

TRUE (ie – setting a trap that the plaintiff later falls into)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what do we mean by contact to a plaintiff’s “person”?

A

contact to anything connected to a plaintiff (ie – clothing, purse)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the two elements of assault (in addition to intent/causation)?

A

1) act by the defendant creates a reasonable apprehension in the plaintiff
2) of an immediate battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is “apprehension” for assault purposes?

A

plaintiff was aware of the threat from defendant’s act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

true or false: plaintiff must be afraid/intimidated to be in reasonable apprehension.

A

FALSE (only knowledge is required)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

true or false: if the defendant only has the apparent ability (not actual) to commit a battery, this IS enough to cause reasonable apprehension.

A

TRUE (ie – unloaded gun pointed at plaintiff)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

true or false: words alone are enough to put a plaintiff in reasonable apprehension.

A

FALSE (needs to be coupled with conduct)
**NOTE = words CAN negate reasonable apprehension! (ie – person shakes fist at plaintiff but says they won’t hit them)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

true or false: a plaintiff’s apprehension must be of an immediate battery to qualify as assault.

A

TRUE (threat of later battery is not assault)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are the two elements to false imprisonment (in addition to intent/causation)?

A

1) an act or omission by the defendant that confines/restrains the plaintiff
2) to a bounded area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is a “bounded area” for false imprisonment purposes?

A

an area in which freedom of movement is restricted in all directions with NO REASONABLE MEANS of escape by the plaintiff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what acts of restraint are sufficient for false imprisonment?

A
  • physical barriers
  • physical force directed at plaintiff, immediate family, or personal property
  • direct threats of force
  • indirect or implied threats of force
  • failure to release the plaintiff when under a legal duty to do so
  • invalid use of legal authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what acts of restraint are insufficient for false imprisonment?

A
  • moral pressure
  • future threats
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

true or false: the confinement period must be substantial to qualify as false imprisonment.

A

FALSE (time of confinement is IRRELEVANT)

17
Q

true or false: the plaintiff must either be aware of the confinement OR be harmed by it to qualify as false imprisonment.

18
Q

true or false: if means of escape exist and are reasonably discoverable by the plaintiff, the area is NOT bounded.

A

TRUE (must have no reasonable means of escape)

19
Q

even if there is a means of escape, it will not be reasonable if it is… (4 options)

A

1) dangerous,
2) disgusting,
3) humiliating, or
4) hidden

20
Q

what are the two elements to intentional infliction of emotional distress (in addition to intent/causation)?

A

1) an act by the defendant amounting to extreme and outrageous conduct, and
2) the plaintiff must suffer severe emotional distress

21
Q

what is “extreme and outrageous conduct”?

A

conduct that is completely indecent and not tolerated in a civilized society

22
Q

when will conduct that is NOT normally outrageous become so?

A

when the conduct is…
1) continuous/repetitive in nature
2) committed by a certain type of defendant (ie– common carriers/innkeepers)
3) directed towards a certain type of plaintiff (ie– children, elderly, pregnant people, supersensitive adults that defendant is aware of)

23
Q

true or false: generally, mere insults are NOT outrageous conduct.

24
Q

what minimum level of intent is enough satisfy IIED?

A

defendant acted with recklessness

25
when will a defendant's act by considered outrageous if directed toward a supersensitive adult?
when the defendant *KNEW* of the adult's particular sensitivity and still acted
26
true or false: actual damages ARE required to prove IIED (unlike other ITs to persons).
TRUE
27
what evidence is sufficient to show that the plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress? (IIED)
only some evidence of severe emotional distress (but no specific physical injury, etc required) **NOTE = subjective standard
28
when may a plaintiff recover for IIED caused by defendant's act to a third person? (bystander IIED) (2 methods + elements to alternative method)
when the plaintiff proves either the prima facie elements of IIED OR: 1) they were *present* when the injury occurred 2) distress resulted in *bodily harm* OR plaintiff is a *close relative* of the third person, and 3) the defendant *KNEW* these facts
29
true or false: IIED is a fallback tort (ie -- if plaintiff can recover under another theory, go with that over IIED).
TRUE