intentional torts to person/ property Flashcards
battery
1) harmful OR offensive contact
2) with plaintiff’s person
always remember intent and volitional act
what is offensive contact?
unpermitted contact for reasonable person
what constitutes P’s person?
includes anything connected to P’s person
- construe P’s person very liberal
Assault
1) reasonable apprehension of
2) imminent harmful or offensive contact
- Do not confuse apprehension with fear or intimidation
(ex: the giant P and tiny D, still assault)
Are words enough for assault
NO, words alone are not enough. Need words plus conduct.
BUT words can also undo conduct
ie: i would hit you if you werent my brother
If there is both battery and assault which one wins?
battery
False imprisonment
1) sufficient act of restraint
2) bounded area
Sufficient act of restraint for false imprisonment
1) threats are enough
2) inaction is enough if understanding that D would do something
3) time period can be very short
Does P need to know they are being confined for false imprisonment
YES, unless they are actually harmed
Shoplifting privilege
1) reasonable belief as to thief
2) reasonable manner of detention (no deadly force)
3) reasonable time of detention
Bounded area:
P’s freedom of movement in ALL directions, mere inconvenience is not enough
When is the P not in bounded area for false imprisonment?
1) when there is a REASONABLE means of escape AND
2) P knows of it
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (high exam question)
intent or recklessness
1) extreme and outrageous conduct
2) damages
what is extreme for IIED?
conduct must be so extreme. must be above and beyond mere insults
When normally non-outrageous conduct becomes outrageous for IIED?
1) conduct is continuous (remains the same but is continuous
2) the type of P
(a) young kid
(b) old fart
(c) pregnant woman
(d) adults with supersentsitivties D knows of
3) type of D
(a) common carriers
(b) innkeepers
What about common carries and innkeepers for IIED?
must be a passenger or guest for normally non-outrageous conduct becomes outrageous
Damages for IIED (are they required)
YES. physical injury is not required for IIED, but clear proof of substantial emotional distress is.
Trespass to land
always remember intent and voluntary act
1) act of PHYSICAL invasion by D
2) on P’s land
Act of physical invasion by D (for trespass to land)
Does not require that D personally go on land.
- just need some PHYSICAL object to go on land
of P’s land (for trespass to land)
includes not only surface but also, A REASONABLE distance, the space going up and down from surface