Intentional torts: intent and consent Flashcards
Tortious intent
The defendant must intend to commit a tort in order to satisfy the requirements of an intentional tort.
Transferred intent does not apply when, e.g., two people playing a sport (consent being a defense to tort) accidentally cause contact with a third person. The conduct would otherwise be tortious conduct had the people intended the offensive conduct.
Transferred intent
Transferred intent applies to satisfy the intent requirement when a person commits:
(1) A different intentional tort against the same person she intended to harm;
(2) The same intentional tort against a different person; or
(3) A different intentional tort against a different person.
Transferred intent: consent defense
Transferred intent does not apply when, for example, two people playing a sport—and consent being a defense to an intentional tort—accidentally cause contact with a third person.
But the conduct would otherwise have been tortious conduct had the people intended the offensive conduct.
Express consent
Express consent exists when the plaintiff, through words or actions, manifests willingness to submit to the defendant’s conduct.
Express consent: exceptions
Express consent does not provide a defense if:
(1) The defendant’s conduct exceeds the scope of the consent;
(2) Consent was by mistake, and the defendant either:
(a) Caused the mistake; or
(b) Knew of the mistake and took advantage of it;
(3) Consent was by fraud and went to an essential—i.e., not collateral—matter; or
(4) The plaintiff lacked capacity to consent—e.g., because of youth, intoxication, or incompetency.
Implied consent: emergencies
There is a presumption that a person in need of rescuing would allow a rescuer to touch her absent explicit consent.
Implied consent: athletic contests
Participants in athletic contests impliedly consent to any resulting injuries, unless:
(1) They result from recklessness; or
(2) They result from conduct falling outside of the scope of the sport.
Implied consent: mutual combat
Mutual combatants are deemed to have impliedly consented to tortious conduct.