Intentional Torts Flashcards
What are the general principles of all intentional torts?
- Don’t count plaintiff’s extreme or hypersensitivity in intentional torts. Assume you’re dealing with person of ordinary sensitivity
- No incapacity defenses in intentional torts
- i.e. kids, ppl with mental/physical disorders/disabilities, ppl who are drunk/high, etc… can be liable for Its
What is transferred intent?
If the defendant indents to commit tort against one specific victim, and a different tort/victim is committed, the defendant is liable for tort committed.
Not technically “intentional” but an intentional tort nonetheless—watch out for this.
What are the elements of Battery?
- Defendant must commit a harmful or offensive contact
- Contact must be with plaintiff’s person
- Can also be anything p is touching/connected to
What is offensive contact?
- Think of offensive as “unpermitted”
- Offensive if it would not be permitted by a person of ordinary sensitivity.
- e.g. teacher greeting each student by petting their hair
- Doesn’t have to be contact with the plaintiff’s person either, e.g. poisioning food.
Does the contact have to be instantaneous?
No, it can be but it doesn’t have to be.
e.g. harmful pranks, poisoning food
What are the elements of assault?
- The plainftiff puts the defendant in reasonable apprehension
- of an immediate battery
What does apprehension mean?
- knowledge
- p has to see it coming
- No need to be scared
- Idle threats, e.g. pulling an unloaded gun on someone, bluffing, still assault (apparent ability creates reasonable apprehension)
What does an immediate battery mean?
- Cannot be words alone. Must be conduct.
- Menacing gesture with conditional words
- E.g. raising hand to slap and saying “if you weren’t my best friend i’d slap you silly”
- Words indicate no intention to actually commit battery, so no immediacy and no assault
- Or raising and telling someone you’re gonna hurt them tomorrow—no apprehension
What are the elements of false imprisonment?
- Defenfant must commit act of restraint
- Plaintiff must be confined in a bounded area
To commit an act of restraint on the plaintiff, may the defendant make only threats?
Yes.
e.g. threaten to shoot someone if they don’t leave
remember no hypersensitivity
Omission can be an act of restraint if…
Defendant owed a pre-existing duty to the plaintiff
e.g. cabin crew does not help physically disabled woman leave plane; paramedic fails to unlock ambulance
An act of restraint only counts if…
The plantiff is aware of it or is harmed by it.
e.g. If defendant lock the plaintiff in a room and unlocks the room before plaintiff realizes she was locked in the room, there is no valid false imprisonment claim.
In order to be confined in a bounded area, there must be NO..
Reasonable means of escape that p can reasonably discover.
If only way out is dangerous, disgusting, humiliating, or hidden, FI.
e.g. leaving locked basement by crawling through sewer pipe
In an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, this type of conduct is also counted as intentional.
Reckless conduct.
Exact language: utter and total disregard of plaintiff’s mental peace and stability.
What are the elements of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress?
- Defendant must engage in outrageous conduct
- Plaintiff must suffer severe emotional distress
What is outrageous conduct?
Conduct that exceeds all bounds of decency tolerated in a civilized society
Are insults considered outrageous conduct?
No. Mere insults are never outrageous conduct.
Courts look for certain hallmarks of outrageousness. They are:
- Conduct is continuous/repetitive/happens frequently
- e.g. continued harassment, debt collectors making abusive threats
- Most comonly tested
- Common carriers/innkeepers as defendants- much more likely to treat conduct as outrageous (e.g. airlines & hotels)
- They have duties to be kind towards customers. Intentional distress is outrageous
- e.g. motel keeper telling person too ugly for vacant room
- Plaintiff is a member of a fragile class of persons
- 3 fragile classes:
- Children
- Elderly people
- Pregnant women- D must know woman is pregnant
- D’s decision to target fragile classes is outrageous
- 3 fragile classes:
It is always outrageous to target behavior that is…
a known emotional sensitivity the plaintiff suffers from
To prove he suffered from severe emotional distress, must the plaintiff offer any particular evidence?
No.
The plaintiff need not offer any particular ev of severe distress
No need to prove lost wages, physical impact, psychiatrist, etc… all valid but not required
Could just testify in a conclusory fashion “I was severely distressed”
On the exam, the severe emotional distress element is often…
negated in the fact pattern.
e.g. “p was mildly annoyed by course of conduct so they sued for intentional infliction of emotional distress”.
WATCH OUT FOR THIS