Intentional Torts Flashcards

1
Q

Prima facie case for intentional tort:

7 Intentional Torts

A

Act by Defendant
Intent
Causation
*Damages (for some)

  1. Assault; 2. Battery; 3. False imprisonment; 4. Trespass to Land; 5. Trespass to Chattel; 6. Conversion; 7. IIED
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intent

A

Specific (purpose to cause certain consequences)
OR
General (substantial certainty that certain consequences will result)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Transferred Intent

A

Doctrine applies when D intends to commit tort against a person but instead: commits different tort against same person; or commits same tort against different person.
Ex: D who acts with intent to commit assault but commits battery is liable for battery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Limitation on Transferred Intent

A

Transferred intent NOT invoked for Conversion or IIED.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Causation

A

Result must’ve been legally caused by D’s act OR something set in motion by D’s act.

Satisfied IF D’s conduct was a substantial factor in resulting injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Battery

A

Harm or offensive contact to the P.

  • Offensive = RP standard.
  • Contact may be direct (ex: hitting P) or indirect (ex: setting trap).
  • Contact can be made with anything connected to P. (Ex: knocking plate out of hand)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

*Damages

A

Actual damages don’t have to be proven. P may recover nominal damages. Punitive for malicious conduct.

Not applicable for IIED, TTC, Conversion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Assault

A

Reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact.

  • Apprehension must be reasonable.
  • Apparent ability sufficient to cause reasonable apprehension.
  • Fear is NOT apprehension!
  • P must be aware of threat.
  • Words alone aren’t enough, but may negate reasonable apprehension.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

False Imprisonment

A

P confined/ restrained to bounded area.

  • Irrelevant to show how short confinement is.
  • P must know of confinement OR be harmed by it.
  • Bounded = no freedom to move anywhere; no reasonable means of escape.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(In)Sufficient methods of confinement:

A

Suff: physical barriers; physical force directed against P, immediate fam, or personal prop; direct threats of force; indirect or implied threats of force; failure to release P when under legal duty to; invalid use of legal authority

Insuff: moral pressure; future threats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

IIED

A

Extreme & outrageous conduct; intent OR recklessness; causation; damages (severe emotional distress).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Extreme & Outrageous Conduct

A

Transcends all bounds of decency.
Conduct may become outrageous IF: it’s continuous in nature; directed toward certain P (children, elderly, pregnant woman); supersensitive adults whose sensitivity D is aware of; or committed by certain d (common carrier or innkeeper).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

IIED Damages

A

ACTUAL damages ARE required. Not nominal.
Proof of physical injury NOT required.
More outrageous the conduct…less proof of damages is required!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

IIED - bystander claim

A

P may recover by showing prima facie case for IIED OR P was present when injury occurred; is a close relative of injured party; and D knew P was present & close relative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

TTL

A

Physical invasion of P’s real property.

  • Invasion may be by person or object.
  • Real prop includes surface; airspace; and subterranean space if P can prove P can make reasonable use of the space
  • Only intent to enter property is needed.
  • Actual or constructive possessor may bring action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

TTC

A

Interference with P’s right of possession in chattel.

  • Interfere = damage or deprive
  • Intent to do act causing interference is enough. Mistaken belief of ownership RE chattel isn’t defense!
  • Actual damages to possessory right required.
17
Q

Conversion

A

Interference with P’s right of possession in chattel so serious that D should pay chattel’s full value.

  • Mistaken belief in ownership of chattel isn’t a defense.
  • Intent to do act causing interference is enough.
  • ONLY tangible personal prop and intangibles reduced to physical form (promissory note).
  • Anyone with possession or immediate right to possession of chattel may bring claim.
18
Q

Acts of Conversion

A

wrongful acquisition; wrongful transfer; wrongful detention; substantially changing, severely damaging, or misusing chattel.

19
Q

Serious Interference

A

Longer withholding period & more extensive use —> closer to conversion.

20
Q

Conversion Remedies

A

May recover damages (FMV at time of conversion) OR replevin (possession).m