Intentional Torts Flashcards
Learn about: - Transferred Intent - Battery - Assault - False Imprisonment - IIED - Trespass to land/chattels - Conversion - Intentional Tort Defenses
What are the prima facie elements of an intentional tort?
- Voluntary act;
- Intent to cause harm;
- Causation; and
- Resulting harm
What intent is needed for intentional torts?
- Intent to cause a harmful result; or
- Acting with knowledge that harm is substantially certain to result
Are children and the mentally incompetent liable for their own torts?
Yes, if they have the requisite intent required for the tort.
Define
doctrine of transferred intent
If D intends to commit a tort but causes injury to a different victim OR commits a different tort than intended, original intent is transferred to the new victim/tort
Transferred intent applies to which torts?
- Assault;
- Battery;
- False imprisonment; and
- Trespass to chattels or land
Elements of battery
- Intentional act;
- That causes harmful, unwanted, or offensive contact to the plaintiff’s person
What qualifies as contact for battery?
Touching either:
- P’s body;
- Something that has a close physical connection to P’s body (purse, pet on a leash); or
- Creating circumstances that will harm P (e.g. putting water on stairs so P will fall)
What constitutes harmful or offensive contact for battery?
Contact that:
- Causes injury, pain, or any physical discomfort to P
- Offends a reasonable person’s sensibilities
Does P need to be aware of the contact to constitute battery?
No
Does P need to prove harm for battery?
No, only that the contact would be
* offensive to a reasonable person; and
* D had the intent to cause the contact
What are the defenses to battery?
- Consent;
- Self-defense;
- Defense of property; and
- Defense of others
Define
eggshell plaintiff rule
Common law doctrine that makes D liable for all injuries/damages to P even if injuries are not reasonably foreseeable (i.e., you take P as you found them, even if P is more susceptible to harm than a typical person)
Elements of assault
- Intentional act by D that creates;
- P’s reasonable apprehension;
- Of imminent harmful or offensive physical contact; and
- Causation
What constitutes reasonable apprehension for assault?
- P is aware of D’s act; and
- Reasonably apprehends imminent harmful or offensive contact
Can reasonable apprehension exist if the D lacks the ability to commit assault?
Yes, as long as P didn’t know D lacked the ability. If P knew that D lacked the ability, then no reasonable apprehension would exist.
Example: If D says “I’m going to kill you with this gun in my bag,” but doesn’t actually have a gun, there is still reasonable apprehension unless the plaintiff knows D doesn’t have a gun in the bag.
Are mere words sufficient for assault?
No, unless in conjunction with other threatening conduct or circumstances.
Are threats of future harm considered assault?
No, the P must fear immediate bodily harm
Elements of false imprisonment
- D intends to confine or restrain P in a bounded area (area where P has no reasonable means of escape);
- D actually confines or restrains P in bounded area;
- P knows or is harmed by confinement
What constitutes confinement for false imprisonment?
Freedom of movement in all directions is limited with no reasonable means of escape.
Examples:
- Use of physical barriers, duress, or threats
- Invalid use of legal authority
Do threats of future or moral harm constitute confinement?
No
Does failing to release from confinement constitute false imprisonment?
Yes
Unless D is not aware of P being trapped in the room.
Example: P gets trapped in the bathroom and D won’t let her out.
Can you negligently falsely imprison someone?
No, false imprisonment requires the intent to confine.
Define
shopkeeper’s privilege
A shopkeeper is not liable for false imprisonment if she:
- Has a reasonable suspicion that P has stolen goods;
- Uses reasonable force to detain P; and
- Only detains P for a reasonable time to confirm/deny the suspicion
⚠️ Note: Only non-deadly force allowed. Shopkeeper can be liable for P’s injuries if actions exceed scope of privilege .
How long does D need to confine P to constitute false imprisonment?
Only briefly; duration is only important to determine damages