Intentional Torts Flashcards
Elements of Intentional Torts
- Voluntary Act - something conscious or willed, as opposed to purely reflexive
- ) Intent - D either:
a. ) desires act to cause harmful result, or
b. ) knows with substantial certainty that it will come about - ) Causation - D’s act, or a force set in motion by D, must cause P’s injury
- ) Harm
- ) No applicable privilege or defense
Transferred Intent
If D acts with necessary intent to inflict certain intentional torts against P, but causes injury to V, then D’s intent transferred to V
what categories of torts does transferred intent apply to?
*applies only to battery, assault, false imprisonment, trespass to land, and trespass to chattels.
Battery
Rule: D causes harmful or offensive contact with P’s person or something closely connected to P
- ) Intent - D must either:
a. ) desire to cause an immediate harmful or offensive contact; or
b. ) know that such contact is substantially certain to occur - ) Harmful or Offensive Contact
a. ) inflict pain or impairment of any function of the body
b. ) offensive to a reasonable person
c. ) P need not be aware of the contact (unlike assault) - ) to the person or something physically closely connected thereto
* P does not have to prove injury; will get compensatory damages just by proving the elements.
Defenses to Battery
consent
Assault
Rule: D intentionally causes P to be in reasonable apprehension of an immediate harm or offensive contact
- ) Intent - D must:
a. ) act with the desire to cause an immediate harmful or offensive contact or the apprehension of such contact; or
b. ) knows that such a result is substantially certain to result - ) Reasonable apprehension - objective (RP) standard.
* If the apprehension is reasonable, it doesn’t matter whether D could actually carry out the threat. For instance, brandishing an unloaded gun can still be assault.
3.) Imminent Battery - must be able to occur almost instantly.
False Imprisonment
Rule: D intentionally causes P to be confined in a bounded area against P’s will and P knows of the confinement or is injured by it
- ) Intent -
a. ) D desires to confine or restrain P in a bounded area, or
b. ) Knows that such confinement is virtually certain to result - ) Confinement in a bounded area
a. ) physical barriers, threats of force, failing to release P after duty to release arises, or the invalid assertion of legal authority
b. ) no duration requirement
c. ) if P KNOWS (actual knowledge) of reasonable means of escape, then no confinement and no liability.
* *reasonable = no threat of harm to P or property; can’t expose P to risk of embarrassment. - ) against P’s will - consent is a defense
- ) P is aware of confinement or injured thereby (harm/damages)
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)
Rule: intentional act that causes invasion of P’s land, interfering with P’s possessory interest in the land
- ) Intent:
a. ) D desired to enter the land/caused something to enter, or
b. ) D knew that land entry was substantially certain to result
* mistake is NOT a defense - ) Entry
a. ) D enters or causes someone/something to enter (ex: bullet hypo)
b. ) D enters the land lawfully but then refuses to leave when required
c. ) D fails to remove/eject from P’s land when under legal duty to do so
3.) P’s land - anyone in possession can bring claim (landowner, tenant, adverse possessor)
Trespass to Chattels
Rule: D interferes with P’s chattel, causing damages
- ) Intent
a. ) D intentionally performs the physical act that interferes with P’s chattel
b. ) Liable even though D did not intend to trespass (i.e., does so with good faith)
c. ) Mistake is not a defense - ) Interference = Uses or borrows without authorization
- ) Plaintiff’s Chattel = P’s personal property
4.) Actual Damages – Unlike trespass to land, proof of actual damages is an element of the
cause of action for trespass to chattels.
**Actual damages to the chattel itself are not
necessary; however, actual damages would include the value of loss of use of the chattel
during a dispossession or the cost to remedy an intermeddling
Remedies - Trespass to Chattels
Damages: Cost of repair, fair market rental value, and potentially punitive damages if D is a
particularly bad actor (willful, wanton, or malicious conduct).
**Replevin – Get back personal
property of which one has been wrongfully dispossessed
Conversion
Rule: Intentional act by D, where D exercises dominion or control that causes the destruction of, or
serious and substantial interference with, P’s chattel
- ) Intent: Mistake no defense – liable even if acting in good faith and no intent
- ) Dominion & Control (BFP)
3.) Destruction or Serious and Substantial Interference = the exercise by D of dominion and
control over the chattel
a.) Interference with P’s property interest is more significant than trespass to chattel.
**Longer period of interference and greater use by D leads to conversion
Remedies - Conversion
- ) Forced sale (common) – Market value at time converted
2. ) Replevin – Action brought by P to get personal property back
Defenses and Privileges to Intentional Torts (list all)
POPCANS
- ) Privilege
- ) Others (defense of others)
- ) Property
- ) Consent
- ) Authority
- ) Necessity
- ) Self-Defense
Property (defense)
1.) can use reasonable force to defend real or personal property
- ) may NEVER use deadly force to protect personal or real property
a. ) look for situations that start from defense of property and escalate to become defense of self/others - ) may use REASONABLE force to eject a trespasser after asking them to leave
- ) Recapture of chattels - reasonable, non-deadly force may be used to get back own personal property if the person seeking to recapture requests its return first or a request would be futile and D is in hot pursuit
Consent (defense)
- ) express: affirmative communication through words
* limit - reasonability; cannot exceed scope of consent - ) implied - RP interprets P’s conduct as evidencing permission to act (e.g., playing sports)
- ) mistake can negate consent when it goes to the consequences or nature of the act