Intentional Torts Flashcards

1
Q

Intent

A

1) Desire to cause contact; or (2) knowledge that contact is substantially certain to result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Nature of Intent

A

Intent is subjective. What did D know or desire?Courts look to circumstantial indicators of intent. (Garratt)

Intent is a state of mind about consequences or results. (Wagner)

Intent to harm is not required. Mistake does not negate intent. (Ranson)

Mental illness does not negate intent. (McGuire v. Almy)

Kids, but not infants, are capable of intent. (Garratt)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is line between intent and negligence?

A

It is a continuum. Substantial certainty of harm is intent, but mere risk of harm is negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Single vs. Dual Intent

A

(1) Intent to cause contact and (2) intent to harm

Only the first is required in majority of jurisdictions now.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can Intent transfer?

A

Intent may transfer between the 5 ITs and between people. (Talmage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Battery

A

(1) Intent, and

(2) Unconsented harmful or offensive touching (3) of the plaintiff’s person or effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Assault

A

1) INTENT TO CAUSE APPREHENSION/ANTICIPATION OF CONTACT (OR
(1) Intent to make contact; and (2) apparent present ability to make contact; and (3) a threatening gesture that causes (4) reasonable anticipation of unconsented imminent contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

False Imprisonment

A

(1) Intent to confine; (2) unconsented confinement within boundaries fixed by D, without apparent and reasonable exit; (3) by unreasonable force, threat of force, or assertion of legal authority; and (4) knowledge of confinement or harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

IIED

A

(1) intent to cause emotional distress (or recklessness); (2) extreme and outrageous conduct; (3) causation; (4) measurable severe emotional distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Trespass to Land

A

(1) Affirmative act, (2) with intent, (3) that invades the possessory interest of another in her land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Trespass to Chattels

A

(1) Act by D, (2) with intent, (3) that is a minor invasion of P’s chattel interest (dispossession or intermeddling); (4) causation; (5) damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Conversion

A

(1) Act by D, (2) with intent, (3) that is a major invasion of P’s chattel interest; (4) causation; (5) damages

REMEDY: forced sale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly