Intentional Torts Flashcards

1
Q

What are the elements of an intentional tort?

A

a) Voluntary Act – Something conscious or willed, as opposed to purely reflexive

b) Intent – D either:
i) Desires act to cause harmful result, or
ii) Knows with substantially certainty that it will come about

c) Causation – D’s act, or a force set in motion by D, must cause P’s injury
d) Harm
e) No applicable privilege or defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is transferred intent?

A

If D acts with necessary intent to inflict certain intentional torts against P, but causes injury to V, then D’s intent is transferred to V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which torts does transferred intent apply to?

A

Only applies to battery, assault, false imprisonment, trespass to land, and trespass to chattels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Battery Rule

A

Rule: D causes harmful or offensive contact with P’s person or something closely connected to P

  • P does not have to prove injury; will get compensatory damages just by showing the elements
  • Privileges and defenses – Consent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Battery Elements Break Down

A

i) Intent: D must either:
(1) Desire to cause an immediate harmful or offensive contact; or
(2) Know that such contact is substantially certain to occur

ii) Harmful or Offensive Contact
(1) Inflict pain or impairment of any function of the body
(2) Offensive to a reasonable person
(3) P need not be aware of the contact (unlike assault)

iii) To the person or something physically closely connected thereto

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Assault Rule

A

Rule: D intentionally causes P to be in reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Assault Elements

A

i) Intent D must:
(1) Act with the desire to cause an immediate harmful or offensive contact or the apprehension of such contact, or
(2) Know that such a result is substantially certain to result

ii) Reasonable Apprehension – objective (RP) standard
(1) If the apprehension is reasonable, it doesn’t matter whether D could actually carry out the threat. For instance, brandishing an unloaded gun can still be assault

iii) Imminent Battery – Must be able to occur almost instantly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

False Imprisonment Rule

A

Rule: D intentionally causes P to be confined in a bounded area against P’s will and P knows of the confinement or is injured by it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

False Imprisonment Elements

A

i) Intent
(1) D desires to confine or restrain P in a bounded area, or
(2) Knows that such confinement is virtually certain to result

ii) Confinement in Bounded Area
(1) Physical barriers, threats of force, failing to release P after duty to release arises, or the invalid assertion of legal authority
(2) No duration requirement
(3) If P knows (actual knowledge) of reasonable means of escape, then no confinement and no liability
(a) Reasonable = no threat of harm to P or property; can’t expose P to risk of embarrassment

iii) Against P’s Will – Consent is a defense
iv) P is aware of confinement OR injured thereby (harm/damages)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) Rule

A

Rule: D engages in an intentional or reckless act amounting to extreme and outrageous conduct that causes P severe emotional distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

IIED Elements

A

i) Intentional or Recklessness
(1) Intentional = D acts with the desire to cause severe emotional distress or knows that such severe emotional distress is virtually certain to occur
(2) Recklessness = D acts in conscious disregard of a high degree of probability that emotional distress will follow

ii) Extreme and Outrageous Conduct
(1) Conduct exceeds all bounds tolerated by civilized society
(2) Offensive or insulting language generally not enough, except when:
(a) D is a common carrier/innkeeper;
(b) D knows of P’s particular sensitivity; or
(c) D is an authority figure using racial/ethnic slurs against a subordinate

iii) Severe Emotional Distress
(1) P does not have to prove physical injury, but distress must be severe – greater than reasonable person (objective test) would expect to endure
(2) Must be substantial/long lasting as opposed to trivial/transitory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Trespass to Land Rule

A

Rule: Intentional act that causes invasion of P’s land, interfering with P’s possessory interest in the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Trespass to Land Elements

A

i) Intent
(1) D desired to enter the land/caused something to enter, or
(2) D knew that land entry was substantially certain to result
(a) Mistake is not a defense

ii) Entry
(1) D enters or causes someone/something to enter (ex: bullet hypo)
(2) D enters the land lawfully but then refuses to leave when required
(3) D fails to remove/eject from P’s land when under legal duty to do so

iii) P’s Land—anyone in possession can bring claim (landowner, tenant, adverse possessor)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Trespass to Chattels Rule

A

Rule: D interferes with P’s chattel, causing damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Trespass to Chattels Elements

A

i) Intent
(1) D intentionally performs the physical act that interferes with P’s chattel
(2) Liable even though D did not intend to trespass (i.e., does so with good faith)
(3) Mistake is not a defense

ii) Interference = Uses or borrows without authorization
iii) Plaintiff’s Chattel = P’s personal property
iv) Actual Damages – Unlike trespass to land, proof of actual damages is an element of the cause of action for trespass to chattels. Actual damages to the chattel itself are not necessary; however, actual damages would include the value of loss of use of the chattel during a dispossession or the cost to remedy an intermeddling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Trespass to Chattels Remedies

A

Damages: Cost of repair, fair market rental value, and potentially punitive damages if D is a particularly bad actor (willful, wanton, or malicious conduct). Replevin – Get back personal property of which one has been wrongfully dispossessed

17
Q

Conversion Rule

A

Rule: Intentional act by D, where D exercises dominion or control that causes the destruction of, or serious and substantial interference with, P’s chattel

18
Q

Conversion Elements

A

i) Intent
(1) Mistake no defense – liable even if acting in good faith and no intent

ii) Dominion and Control (BFP)

iii) Destruction or Serious and Substantial Interference = the exercise by D of dominion and control over the chattel
(1) Interference with P’s property interest is more significant than trespass to chattel. Longer period of interference and greater use by D leads to conversion

19
Q

Conversion Remedies

A

i) Forced sale (common) – Market value at time converted

ii) Replevin – Action brought by P to get personal property back

20
Q

Defenses and Privileges to Torts = POPCANS

A
  • Privilege
  • Others (defense of others)
  • Property
  • Consent
  • Authority
  • Necessity
  • Self-Defense
21
Q

Defenses and Privileges to Torts: Property

A

i) Can use reasonable force to defend real or personal property

ii) May never use deadly force to protect personal or real property
(1) Look for situations that start from defense of property and escalate to become defense of self/others

iii) May use reasonable force to eject a trespasser after asking them to leave
iv) Recapture of chattels – Reasonable, non-deadly force may be used to get back own personal property if the person seeking to recapture requests its return first or a request would be futile and D is in hot pursuit

22
Q

Defenses and Privileges to Torts: Consent

A

i) Express – Affirmative communication through words
(1) Limit – Reasonability; cannot exceed scope of consent

ii) Implied – RP interprets P’s conduct as evidencing permission to act (e.g., playing sports)
iii) Mistake can negate consent when it goes to the consequences or nature of the act

23
Q

Defenses and Privileges to Torts: Authority

A

i) Arrest
(1) Police officer can arrest if reasonably believes D committed a felony
(2) Police officer can arrest for misdemeanor if D’s action constituted a breach of the peace
(3) Private person acts at own peril – if wrong, liable for tort

ii) Shopkeeper’s Privilege
(1) Not liable for false imprisonment if had a reasonable suspicion that P stole
(2) Can detain for reasonable period, in reasonable manner, on the premises/immediate vicinity

iii) Discipline – Parent/teacher may use reasonable force to discipline child

24
Q

Defenses and Privileges to Torts: Necessity

A

i) D permitted to injure P’s property if it is reasonably necessary to avoid a substantially greater harm to public, self, or D’s property
ii) Public – D is acting to protect the public at-large from severe harm

iii) Private – D commits intentional tort to protect self; i.e., better the tort was committed than risk the consequence. If RP would believe action taken was necessary to avoid the requisite harm,
D is privileged, even if D made an honest mistake in that regard
(1) D is not liable for the technical tort, but will have to pay for harm D caused

25
Q

Defenses and Privileges to Torts: Self-Defense

A

Rule: D honestly and reasonably believes that D used reasonable force to prevent P from engaging in an imminent and unprivileged attack

(1) D only needs to be reasonable and respond with proportionate force
(2) Deadly force cannot be used against non-deadly threat