Intentional or Reckless Infliction of Emotional Distress Flashcards
What are the elements of intentional or reckless Infliction of emotional distress?
- When defendant 2. By extreme and outrageous conduct 3. Causes severe emotional distress 4. To Plaintiff.
What is the scope of liability for intentional or reckless Infliction of emotional distress?
- Emotional distress suffered by the Plaintiff. 2. Any resulting bodily harm to Plaintiff.
To be actionable how extreme must defendant’s conduct be?
To go beyond all possible bounds of decency, to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in civilized society.
When are words of merely verbal abuse, absent circumstances of aggravation, sufficient for intentional or reckless Infliction of emotional distress?
When defendant knows that the Plaintiff has some special sensitivity or vulnerability.
When are instances of abusive or otherwise obnoxious conduct sufficient to make a case of intentional or reckless Infliction of emotional distress?
When they are repeated or carried out over a period of time.
Under what circumstances is profanity, gross insults or indecent language sufficient to make a case of intentional or reckless Infliction of emotional distress?
When the defendant is a common carrier, innkeeper or other public utilities or the defendant is an employee of such acting within the scope of their employment.
When may defendant be liable for intentional or reckless Infliction of emotional distress to the Plaintiff when defendant’s conduct was directed at a third person?
- When the Plaintiff contemporaneously perceives the distress producing event.
Under the proximate cause doctrine what is the liable for intentional or reckless Infliction of emotional distress?
For the distress a reasonable person of ordinary sensitivity would endure unless the defendant knew Plaintiff was peculiarly or specially sensitive.
When may a public official/figure recover for intentional or reckless Infliction of emotional distress resulting from a media publication?
When the publication contains a false statement of fact that was made with “actual malice “ in other words knowing the statement was false or with reckless disregard as to whether or not the statement was true. [Hustler Magazine v. Falweell (U.S.1988)]
Who may sue for intentional or reckless Infliction of emotional distress in the mishandling of a corpse?
A next of kin.