Intention to create legal relations Flashcards

1
Q

In which case was it held that in domestic situations, there is a presumption that there is no intention to create legal relations

A

Balfour v Balfour- husband promised £30 maintenance payment, could not be legally enforceable due to domestic relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where was it held that domestic situation may give rise to legal intentions

A

where a third party is involved- Parker v Clark- major changes position for the younger couple- they had sold their house, so the agreement was held to be legally binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which case should that the agreement will not be legally binding will be rebutted in cases where one party has performed their side of the promise, and is seeking to enforce performance from the other

A

Merritt v Merritt: after leaving house, husband promises to transfer the matrimonial home into the wife’s sole name providing she pays the mortgage off- held to be legally enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In which case was held to be a border line case

A

Jones v Padavaton: mother promises to provide maintenance if daughter reads for the bar, held not be enforceable as this was a family relationship as if balfour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When entering a commercial transaction what is the presumption

A

the presumption is that legal relations are intended: the burden of proof is on the party disputing the existence of contractual intentions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which case held that the presumption is hard to rebut

A

Edwards v Skyways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In which commercial situation was it held that there was no intention to create legal relation

A

Rose & Frank & Co v JR Crompton & Bros Ltd- ‘honourable’ pledge clause, expressly stated not to be subject to legal jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In which case Challenging burden of proof, need clear evidence that intended contract even though not expressed-

A

Baird Textile Holdings Ltd V Marks & Spencer plc (C was a supplier to M&S for over 30 years in accordance with D’s wishes and no express contract. Without warning M&S terminated the contract with C. C claimed there was an implied contract. CA held there was no binding contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

when will there sometimes be a requirement of formality

A

to provide a reliable record of fact and content. E.g. most contracts for the sale of an interest in land must be ‘made in writing’ Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly