Intention To Create Legal Relations Flashcards

1
Q

What is the presumption regarding intention to create legal relations in business contracts?

A

There is a presumption that there is an intention to create legal relations, making them legally binding.

This is supported by the case Esso Petroleum v Customs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must both parties provide for a business contract to be legally binding?

A

Both parties need to give consideration.

Consideration refers to something of value exchanged between the parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Under what circumstances can the presumption of legal intent in business contracts be rebutted?

A

Clear words indicating no legal intent or vague language can rebut the presumption.

Examples include terms like ‘act of goodwill’ or ‘gentlemen’s agreement’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an example of a case where the presumption of no legal intent was established?

A

Edwards v Skyways.

The case involved clear language showing no legal intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Are contracts involving free gifts and competition prizes legally binding?

A

Yes, they can be legally binding.

Supported by cases like McGowan v Radio Buxton.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who has the burden of proof when claiming no legal intent in a contract?

A

The party trying to establish no legal intent.

This is usually the defendant in the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What presumption exists for domestic/social contracts?

A

There is a presumption that there is NO intention to create legal relations, making them not legally binding.

Supported by the cases Balfour v Balfour and Jones v Padavatton.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What can rebut the presumption of no legal intent in domestic contracts?

A

A commercial basis, consideration exchanged, or evidence of acting on the promise.

Cases like Simpkins v Pays and Merritt v Merritt illustrate these points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In what scenario can family business agreements be legally binding?

A

If there is no rebuttal to the presumption of no legal intent.

The case Snelling v Snelling supports this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How are pre-nuptial agreements viewed by the courts?

A

They are increasingly seen as legally binding.

This is supported by the case Granatino v Radmacher.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fill in the blank: Domestic arrangements may be held to be business arrangements if they go beyond _______.

A

social kindness.

This concept is illustrated in the case Albert v Motor Insurer’s Bureau.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

True or False: A contract between family members is always legally binding.

A

False.

Even with a commercial basis, clear words indicating no legal intent can nullify the binding nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who has the burden of proving that the rebuttal applies in establishing legal intent?

A

The party trying to establish legal intent

This refers to the individual or party attempting to demonstrate that a rebuttal to a presumption exists in the context of a contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In the case discussed, what must the person seeking to enforce the contract show?

A

Legal intent

This is particularly pertinent when the contract is not clearly domestic or commercial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What presumption exists regarding domestic/social contracts, such as between mother and son?

A

There is a presumption that there is no intention to create legal relations

This presumption can be rebutted under certain circumstances.

17
Q

What can rebut the presumption of no legal intent in the discussed case?

A

A clear commercial basis to the contract

This includes scenarios where the relationship has evolved beyond personal affection, such as business dealings.

18
Q

What action by C supports the argument for a legally binding contract?

A

C helped his mother’s business and acted on her promise

This indicates that C’s actions were not merely based on familial affection but involved a business transaction.

19
Q

What is another factor that could rebut the presumption of no intention to create legal relations?

A

Money has changed hands in exchange for services

This transforms the nature of the relationship from social to commercial.

20
Q

What conclusion can be drawn about the contract between C and his mother?

A

The contract is legally binding and C is entitled to be paid

This conclusion is based on the evidence presented regarding the nature of the contract.

21
Q

Fill in the blank: The rebuttal of the presumption of no legal intent is applicable in this case if there is a clear _______.

A

commercial basis to the contract