Intention to create legal relations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is meant by ‘Intention to create legal relations’?

A

Parties must INTEND to enter into a legally binding arrangement in which the rights and obligations of the agreement are enforceable.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the general view regarding intention in business agreements?

A

Business agreements are presumed to be legally binding. ​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a case for business agreements ?

A

Edwards v Skyways - The agreement had been made in a business context which raised a strong presumption that the agreement is legally binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How can intention in business agreements be rebutted through a certain type of agreement? Name a case.

A

In business, there can be a so-called ‘gentlemen’s agreement’ which is usually discovered by a term that states the contract is binding in honour only.​

Jones v Vernons Pools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How can intention in business agreements be rebutted a different way? With case. (letter)

A

Letters of comfort - Letters of comfort are a written assurance usually provided by a parent company in respect of its subsidiary’s financial obligations to a bank

Kleinwort Benson ltd v MMC - The comfort letter had no legal effect. The fact that MMC BHD ​had refused to act as guarantor demonstrated they did not ​
intend to be legally bound.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the general view regarding intention in social and domestic agreements? (case)

A

In social and domestic agreements, the law raises a presumption that the parties do not intend to create legal relations.

Balfour v Balfour - The agreement was a purely social and domestic agreement and therefore it was presumed that the parties did not intend to be legally bound.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How can be presumption regarding social and domestic agreements not being legal be rebutted?

A

If there is evidence of either:
1) The agreement in writing​
2) The agreement coming after the couple have separated​ (Merrit v Merrit)
3) The presence of a third party or if money has changed hands (it is more likely to be binding)​
4) In addition, giving up financial security can provide evidence (Parker v Clarke)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly