Insurance Flashcards
Scottish Amicable v NAC
- contract, insurer takes consideration of payment of estimated equivalent
- make up loss to assured
The Medical Defence Union Limited
- contract, 3 present elements:
- x entitled if y event occurs
- y event must involve uncertainty
- x must have insurable interest in subject-matter of contract (right to benefit must be certain)
Department of Trade and Industry v St Christopher’s..
- “benefit”
- sum of money or equivalent service
- measurable in financial terms
Digital Satellite Warranty Cover Ltd
- DWSC argued contracts were not regulated insurance contracts
- Held: they could be, therefore in breach of FSMA 2000
- selling warranty contracts for repair/replacement without authorisation
Griffiths v Fleming
- assumption that insured has insurable interest in own life
Wight v Brown
- assumption of insurable interest in life of spouse/civil partner
Feasey v Sun Life Assurance
- insurable interest discovered from circumstances - no one definition
- subject of insurance ascertained by terms of policy
- insurable interest when contract entered and at time of loss (indemnity)
Dalby
- insurable interest when contract entered but need not exist at time of loss
- policy valid at creation, still valid at death even when cancelled
Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd
- M, shareholder and unsecured creditor of company
- insurance policy for timber in own name
- no insurable interest
- creditor nor shareholder has insurable interest in assets of company
*Cowan v Jeffrey Associates
- C shareholder and company director
- company owned heritable property
- C had no insurable interest in property at time loss occured
- insurable interest must exist at time of loss
(conclusion of missives is minimum requirement of II)
Mitchell v Scottish Eagle Insurance Co.
- partnership - only II in partnership itself
- no individual interest of joint partners
Fehilly
- ballroom lease
- tenant insurable interest only in relation to repair as subject in the condition in which lease provided
- did not cover full reinstatement of destroyed property
Chapman v Pole
- insured can only recover real and actual value of goods
Leppard v Excess Insurance Co Ltd
- indemnity > insured placed in same financial position as before loss
- recoverable only to market value as agreed when insurance
- claimed rebuilding = 8k, awarded and upheld 3k
- anything more than 3k would amount to profit
Sprung v Royal Insurance
- insurers wrongfully declined pay out, later did
- claim from insured for compensation denied
- interest on late sums was sufficient compensation
Strachan
- Scots law allow damage claim for compensation
- payment classified as obligation to pay damages for breach of contract
Castellian v Preston
- insurers subrogated - could recover money from indemnity in relation to newly sold house fire
- purpose of subrogation is ensure policyholder is indemnified not not over indemnified
Caledonia North Sea Limited v London Bridge Engineering Ltd
- insurance company subrogated - rights of insured
- insurer must raise action in name of insured
Lord Napier & Ettrick v Hunter
- subrogation from “top down”
- insurers entitled to remedy of funds recieved by insured from 3rd party
- if loss greater than sum insured, won’t get full amount
Simpson & Co. v Thomas Burrall
- insurer entitled to realise assets of wreckage if paid a total loss
JJ Llyod Instruments “Miss Jay Jay”
- policy covered perils of sea, not design fault
- not determined by dominant cause of ship loss
- design not positively excluded in policy
- insurers liable.
“Popi M”
- onus on insured to prove caused loss was included as insured peril
- insurers do not have to prove contrary
Wayne Tank v Pump co Ltd
- positive exclusion of cause of fire in policy meant insurers not liable
- insurance policy covered course of business in premises other than own
Pan Atlantic v Pine Top Industries Co.
- “influence judgment”
- fact would have had effect on prudent insurer’s mind
- only entitles insurer to avoid policy if actually induced making of contract