insurance Flashcards
difference between insurance and guarantee
One difference is that insurance is a direct
agreement between the insurance provider and the
policyholder, while a guarantee involves an indirect agreement
between a beneficiary and a third party, along with the primary
agreement between the principal and beneficiary.
A second difference is that insurance policy calculations are
based on underwriting and possible loss, while a guarantee is
focused strictly on performance or nonperformance. In addition,
insurance providers or policyholders can cancel policies with
notice, while guarantees often cannot be canceled
what are the principles of insurance
These are:
1. Principle of Utmost good faith
2. Principle of Insurable interest
3. Principle of Indemnity
4. Principle of Subrogation
5. Principle of Contribution
6. Principle of Proximate cause
7. Principle of Loss of Minimization
- PRINCIPLE OF UBERRIMAE FIDEI
(UTMOST GOOD FAITH
Both the parties i.e. the insured and the insurer should have a good faith towards each other. Both parties must provide eachother with correct clear information on subject matter.
The insurer’s liability gets void (i.e legally revoked or
cancelled) if any facts, about the subject matter of
insurance are either omitted, hidden, falsified or presented in a wrongmanner by theinsured
*A material fact is one which would have influenced the judgment of a prudent insurer in deciding whether he would accept the risk in whole or in part
and, if so, at what amount of premium
FACTS WHICH MUST BE DISCLOSED:
(i)Facts, which show that a risk represents a greater exposure than would be expected from its nature e.g., the fact that a part of the building is being used for storage of inflammable materials.
(ii) External factors that make the risk greater than normal e.g. the building is located next to a warehouse storing explosive material
(iii) Facts, which would make the amount of loss greater than that normally expected e.g. there is no segregation of hazardous goods from non-hazardous
goods in the storage facility.
(iv) History of Insurance (a) Details of previous losses and claims (b) if any other Insurance Company has earlier declined to insure the property and the special condition imposed by the other insurers; if any.
(v) The existence of other insurances.
(vi) Full facts relating to the description of the subject matter of Insurance.
LIC V. Sakunthalabai
AIR 1975 AP 68
Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) sought to repudiate a life insurance policy taken out The grounds for repudiation were based on a discrepancy in Jamanadas’ “personal statement.”
In personal statement Jamanadas stated that he had not suffered from any illness and had not consulted any medical practitioner within the last five years.
However, it was later discovered that he had once suffered from indigestion for a few days and had taken a remedy from an Ayurvedic practitioner. LIC said that it was a misrepresentation on his partt that he went to ayurvedic practioner etc and did not disclose but then the reason he died was jaundice. court held jaundice and indigeston are not related at all
- The non-disclosure about the earlier indigestion was inconsequential and did not affect the risk.
LIC was directed to pay the insurance amount with interest
//
Courts recognized that minor inaccuracies should not lead to harsh consequences for the insured’s dependents.
lifeinsurance
Rohini Nandan V. Ocean Accident And
Guarantee Corp.
AIR 1960 Cal 696
- fire and burglary insurance taken- and The plaintiff suppressed a previous burglary worth 2000 when obtaining an insurance policy. later he was burgled. the plaintiff’s suppression of the previous burglary fact was significant.
The non-disclosure invalidated the policy, and the plaintiff forfeited all rights under it.
- PRINCIPLE OF INSURABLE INTEREST
- Principle of indemnity
The principle of insurable interest states that the person getting insured must have insurable interest in the object of insurance. A person has an insurable
interest when the physical existence of the insured object gives him some gain but its non-existence will give him a loss. In simple words, the insured person must suffer some financial loss by the damage of the
insured object.
//
Indemnity means guarantee or assurance to put the insured in the same position in which he was immediately prior to the happening of the uncertain event. The insurer undertakes to make good the loss.
* It is applicable to fire, marine and other
general insurance.
* Under this the insurer agreed to compensate
the insured for the actual loss suffered
*However, in case of life insurance, the principle of indemnity does not apply because the value of human life cannot be measured in terms of money
PRINCIPLE OF SUBROGATION
per this principle after the insured is
compensated for the loss due to damage to property insured, then the right of ownership of such property passes to the insurer. * This principle is corollary of the principle of indemnity and is applicable to all contracts of indemnity. Subrogation means substituting one creditor for
another.
PRINCIPLE OF CONTRIBUTION
and PRINCIPLE OF CAUSA PROXIMA
PRINCIPLE OF CONTRIBUTION: if the insured has taken out more than
one policy on the same subject matter.
*According to this principle, the insured can claim the compensation only to the extent of actual loss either from all insurers or from any one insurer.
*If one insurer pays full compensation then that insurer can claim proportionate claim from the other insurers
//
PRINCIPLE OF CAUSA PROXIMA
The loss of insured property can be caused by more than one cause in succession to another.
* The property may be insured against some causes and not against all causes.
* In such an instance, the proximate cause or nearest cause of loss is to be found out
A cargo ship’s base was punctured due to rats and so sea water entered and cargo was damaged. Here there are two causes for the damage of the cargo ship
(i) The cargo ship getting punctured because of rats, and
(ii) The sea water entering ship through puncture.
The risk of sea water is insured but the first cause is not. The nearest cause of damage is sea water which is insured
and therefore the insurer must pay the compensation.
However, in case of life insurance, the principle of
Causa Proxima does not apply. Whatever may be
the reason of death (whether a natural death or
an unnatural death) the insurer is liable to pay
the amount of insurance
- PRINCIPLE
OF LOSS MINIMIZATION
According to the Principle of Loss Minimization, insured must always try his level best to minimize the loss of his insured property, in case of uncertain
events like a fire outbreak or blast, etc.
*The insured must take all possible measures and necessary steps to control and reduce the losses in such a scenario. The insured must not neglect and
behave irresponsibly during such events just because the property is insured.
*Hence it is a responsibility of the insured to protect his insured property and avoid further losses.
Mr. Arvind’s house is set on fire due to an
electric short-circuit. In this tragic scenario, Mr. Arvind must try his level best to stop fire by all possible means, like first calling nearest fire department office, asking neighbours for emergency fire extinguishers, etc.
He must not remain inactive and watch his house burning hoping, “Why should I worry? I’ve insured
myhouse.
what is risk
Risk can be defined in several different ways
The probability of something happening multiplied by the resulting cost or benefit if it does.
The probability or threat of quantifiable damage, injury, liability, loss, or any other negative occurrence that is caused by external or internal vulnerabilities, and that may be avoided through preemptive action
Insurable risks:
The risks may be insurable or non-insurable.
I. Risks which are measurable, and which could be pre-estimated in terms of money are insurable.
II. Speculative risk is not insurable as it is not measurable. Speculation in shares, in the rates of commodities, etc., are non-insurable.
Greater risks attract greater premium, Hence, higher premiums are charged in fire insurance for explosives, fire works, highly inflammable substance
HARI KISHANDAS V. GUARDIAN ASSURANCE CO.
AIR 1933 ALL 900
He sought insurance for his Steam Roller Flour Mills for a sum of Rs. 7,71,000.
The plaintiff company (Guardian Assurance Company) issued a risk note covering the risk from February 25, 1927, to June 13, 1927.
Contract Formation:
The defendant’s application was received, and the risk was immediately covered.
The plaintiff claimed that the risk was insured during the specified period.
The defendant declined to pay the premium, leading to the cancellation of the contract.
Validity of Contract:
The defendant argued that no valid contract existed due to non-payment of the premium.
However, the court rejected this contention.
Waiver of immediate premium payment is possible, especially in fire insurance cases.
The risk note issued by the plaintiff constituted a valid contract of insurancethe court upheld the validity of the insurance contract despite the non-payment of the premium. The risk note issuance by the plaintiff was sufficient to establish the contract
Gray v. Barr
Court will not help a criminal who wants to recover any kind of benefit or
indemnity for his own crime.
DURATION OF RISK
Acontract of insurance is incomplete till the duration of the policy is specified.
CASAES?
Issacs v. Royal Insurance Co., South Staffordshire v. Sickness and Accident
Assurance Association, the policy expires at midnight of the last date specified.
It follows that if loss occurs at any time before midnight of the last date specified in the policy, the
insurers are liable.
Commercial Union Assurance Co. v Binjraj Joharmal AIR 1931 Cal 285- It is not unussual to fix the duration of the policy
with reference to the happening of an event
HOW IS INDEMNITY PROVIDED?
manner and the choice is entirely of the insurer
1) Cash Payment
2) Repairs
3) Replacement
4) Reinstatement
-Reinstatement as a method of Indemnity is rarely used
because of its inherent difficulties e.g., if the property after restoration fails to meet the specifications of the original in any material way or performance level then the Insurer will be liable to pay damages. Secondly, the expenditure involved
in restoration may be much more than the sum Insured as once they have agreed to reinstate they have to do so irrespective of the cost.
Limitations on Insurers Liability
The maximum amount recoverable under any policy is
the sum insured, which is mentioned on the policy. The amount is not the agreed value of the property (except in Valued policies) nor is it the amount, which will be paid automatically on occurrence of loss. What will be paid is the actual loss or sum insured whichever is less.
2. Property Insurance is subjected to the Condition of Average. The underlying principle behind this condition is that Insurers are the trustees of a pool of premiums
from which they meet the losses of the few who suffer damage, so it is reasonable to conclude that every Insured should bring a proper contribution to the pool by way of
premium. Therefore if an insured deliberately or otherwise underinsures his property thus making a lower contribution to the pool, he is not entitled to receive the
full benefits.
The application of this principle makes the insured his own
Insurer to the extent of under-insurance i.e. the pro-rata
difference between the Actual Value and the sum insured.
The amount of loss will be shared between the Insurer and
the insured in the proportion of sum insured and the amount
underinsured. The formula applicable for arriving at the
amount to be paid by the Insurance Co. is
Claim = Loss X (Sum Insured / Market Value)
tel me about broken chain/ subsequent cause in insurance
Irrespective of the fact that subsequent causes are covered
or not if it is established that the event starting the chain is a covered peril then claim is payable.
However if reverse were the case and the chain was started
by an excepted or excluded peril then the claim would
not be payable.
In case of the Broken sequence or Interrupted chain of events if the chain of events is started by an Insured peril but interrupted by an excepted or excluded peril then the claim is paid after deducting the damage caused by
the excluded peril.
For example, the burglars enter the
house and leave the gas stove on leading to a fire and the
house is damaged in the fire. The “burglary Insurance” will only pay for the loss due to theft but exclude loss due to fire, which is accepted peril under the burglary policy.
** In case the sequence of events started by an excluded
peril is broken by an Insured peril, as a new and** independent cause then there is a valid claim for even the damage caused by exempted peril. The burglars enter
the house and after carrying out thefts put the house on
fire. The fire policy will pay for the damages due to theft
as well (which is an excluded peril).
-
if the case of loss due to concurrent causes or two or
more causes occurring simultaneously then **all the causes will have to be Insured perils only then the claim **would
be payable but even if one of the causes is an excluded
peril the claim will not be payable
what is reinsurance
Through a reinsurance scheme, an insurance company is able to bring together or ‘pool’ its insurance policies
and then divide up the risk among a number of insurance providers so that in the event that a large loss occurs
this will be divided up throughout a number of firms, thereby saving the one insurance company from large
losses.
Insurance and reinsurance are similar in concept in that they are both tools that guard against large losses.
Insurance, on the one hand, is a protection for the individual, whereas reinsurance is the protection taken out by
a large insurance firm to ensure that they survive large losses. The premium that is paid by an individual will be
received by the company that provides the insurance
Whereas the insurance premium paid for reinsurance will be divided among all the insurance companies in the
pool that bear the risk of loss.
WHAT IS PREMIUM? and days of grace
Premium is the price for the risk undertaken by the insurers.
In a contract of insurance, the premium for which the insurer agrees to discharge his liability
is the consideration.
It is not necessary that the premium shall be paid in money. Any other consideration which is sufficient to support a legally valid contract can constitute a premium.
DAYS OF GRACE=
The insurers are under no obligation to demand the amount of premium as and when it becomes due
though, in practice, a notice for payment of premium is sent to the insured.
Even if the notice is not received, it is the duty of the insured to pay the premium. Non- receipt of the
notice is not a defence for non-payment of premium.
Generally, there is a stipulation in the policy on their renewal notice that the insured may pay
the renewal premium after the due date of payment and within so may days of grace. if the renewal premium is not paid even during the days of grace, the policy would lapse.
sec 50 and sec 113 of insurance act
Section 50 (1)- An insurer shall, 1[before the expiry of three months from the date on which
the premiums in respect of a policy of life insurance were payable but not paid,] give notice to the
policy-holder informing him of the options available to him 2[unless these are set forth in the policy].
Section 113- Acquisition of surrender value by policy.–
(1) A policy of life insurance shall
acquire surrender value as per the norms specified by the regulations.
(2) Every policy of life insurance shall contain the formula as approved by the Authority for
calculation of guaranteed surrender value of the policy
alteration of insurance
. In some policies, there may be express conditions relating to the alteration of the risk. Those conditions may prohibit alterations,
(a) absolutely,
(b) without prior notice,
(c) without prior sanction, or
(d) increasing the risk.
Where there is an express absolute prohibition of alteration, any alteration even if trivial would render the policy void.
If the prohibition is in regard to alterations increasing the risk, the alterations which do not increase the risk will not void the policy.
Whether alteration increases or decreases the risk is a question of fact. This must be proved by the insurance company. There may be conditions prohibiting alterations without notice and in such a case mere giving of prior notice is sufficient. On the other hand there may be a prohibitionfrom alteration not only without giving mere notice but without obtaining previous sanction. Then for the continued Validity of the policy, the alteration must be made with prior sanction. Every alteration increasing risk must be sanctioned. Simply because the insurer sanctioned an alteration increasing the risk on a prior occasion, he is not bound to sanction another alteration which increases the original risk though it does not go in excess of the prior sanctioned alteration. Such an increase in risk caused by an alteration also requires a fresh sanction.
elements of risk
(A) In Life Insurance :
1. habits in life or mode of living,
2. occupation,
3. environment,
4. heredity,
6. previous illness, and
(B) In Property Insurance :
1. the nature of the property, e.g., movable or immovable or otherwise,
2. character and constitution,
3. area,
4. situation and locality,
5. exposure to outside dangers,
6. inherent defect,
7. use and habit of the assured,
8. the title of the property.
(C) In Marine Insurance :
1. voyage and its nature,
2. the route of the voyage,
3. the winds and storms in the locality,
4. the danger of war, capture and seizure
Term policies and Whole life insurance policies
Term policies=
5 to 50 years term, no payment of maturity benefit on the survival. if death during time that policy is active= sum assured is paid to beneficiary - no excessive premium
Whole life insurance policies=
Whole life insurance is a type of life insurance that o ers coverage right until the
death of the policyholder. In this policy, you can opt for either a participating or
non-participating policy, as per your nancial needs and risk appetite. Though
the premiums for participating whole life insurance are higher in comparison,
dividends are paid out at regular intervals to the policyholders. The premium
rates for a non-participating policy are lower, but the policyholder generally
cannot avail the bene ts of regular dividends.