Instrumental, operant, contiguity +contingency Flashcards

instrumental and operant conditioning

1
Q

classical conditioning

A

Learning associations between stimuli
Ex. a bell meant food was coming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

instrumental conditioning

A

Learning associations between stimuli, response, and outcome, leads to get directed behavior
Ex. brush teeth, no cavities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

thorndike puzzle box

A

Food restricted cats
Goal: escape and food measured latency to escape
Cats learned association between stimulus and response
Association affected by outcome
Rope in box (S) + pulling rope (R) → escape (o)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

law of effect

A

Response to a stimulus followed by a satisfying event strengthened S-R relationship
Ex. pull rope→ food and escape→ less time to escape
Response to a stimulus followed by an annoying event→ Weekend S-R relationship
Ex. pull rope in the box→ shock→ longer time to escape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

discrete trial approach

A

Response is performed once
Behavior of subject terminates trial
Timing of trial determined by the experimenter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

free operant approach

A

Subject is free to respond at any time
May be repeated many times
Timing of responses determined by subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

skinner box - operant

A

Skinner box measures operant response rate
Ex: number of lever presses for food
Operant responses
Behavior that “operates” on the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

magazine training (classical conditioning)

A

How to produce target response
Step 1: magazine training
Classical conditioning- sound of the magazine (food dispenser) is a CS+, followed by a food US that orients organism
Ex. shaking kat kaviar to get cats attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

shaping (instrumental)

A

Rewarding successive approximations to target behavior by;
1. Reinforcing closer actions to the correct response
2.Not reinforcing early non target responses (only when rat touches bar they get a treat)
Correct steps are preserved
Ex. the rat still rears up to push the bar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

shaping familiar response

A

Must be a variable response
Opening of the beak to eat
Slowly step up criteria
Can bring about super or miniature responses
With training we can modify consummatory behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Deich allan andzeigler

A

Training beak opening in pigeons
Terminology
A response may produce 1 or 2 outcomes
Appetitive stimulus:
Pleasant outcome (getting paid, food, sunshine)
Aversive stimulus:
Negative outcome (yelling, shock, cold)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

contingency

A

something likely to occur bc of something else
Positive contingency:
Response turns on/causes and outcome
A rat can press the lever to get food
Negative contingency
Response turns off/ inhibits an outcome
A rat can turn off a loud noise by pressing the lever

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

positive reinforcement

A

Positive contingency between response and appetitive stimulus
Response turns on a good thing
Outcome
Increased responding
Ex
Dog training
Good grades
Working to get paid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

punishment

A

Positive contingency between response and aversive stimulus (response turns on a bad thing)
Outcome: decreased responding
Ex
Ticket for speeding
Cat goes on table gets sprayed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

omission

A

Negative contingency between a response and an appetitive stimulus
Response removes an appetitive stimulus (response removes smth you like)
Outcome: decreased responding
Ex
Swearing leads to loss of TV
Hit bro phone gets taken away
Autoshaping reversal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

negative reinforcemnt

A

Negative contingency between response and aversive stimulus
Response turns off or avoids a bad thing
Outcome: increased responding
Types

Escape: aversive stimulus present at the time of behavior, stopped by response
Cats do smth to avoid smth aversive
Taking advil to get rid of headache

Avoidance: aversive stimulus schedules to happen but is prevented from happening by response - never experience the aversive stimulus its prevented
Putting sunscreen on if you know your going in the sun

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Barton bulle and repp

A

Differential reinforcement of other behaviors
Subjects- students w autism spectrum disorder
Behaviors
Hand flapping- decrease
Omission training
Other behaviors- increase
Positive reinforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

You drink 4 locos at a party and find its easier to socialize, so u drink it again next time out

A

Positive reinforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

U are deathly afraid of clowns after your catastrophic 5th birthday,every time you see one you run and hide

A

Negative reinforcement
escape

20
Q

instrumental conditioning foundation

A

Response
Response- reinforcer - relation
Reinforcer

21
Q

response

A

Behavior performed
Conditioned behavior depends upon the response conditioned
Variable vs stereotyped response
Belongingness of response
Behavioral systems

22
Q

reinforce any–>

A

stereotype response

23
Q

reinforce variability–>

A

variable response

24
Q

Page and neuringer

A

Pigeons peck 2 keys 8 times→ food
Control group: any sequence→ food
Variability group: no repeat→ food
Reinforcing variability encourages creativity

25
belongingness in thorndike box
Cats wouldn't yawn to escape They didn't make connection Why Final cause (evolutionary)
26
instinctive drift
Responses are impacted by instincts (like raccoons rubbing fish in hands before eating)
27
Breland and breland
Trained animals for zoos and commercials using food Food related examples Raccoons rubbed coins together Racoons were awarded with food after being restricted, so the instinct was to not let coins go Pigs rooted around coins Pigs were rewarded with food, but these coins were just pushed around in the dirt with snout (bc they are used to rolling in dirt)
28
behavior systems theory
Learning response depends on compatibility with natural behaviors Feeding system activated→ food related behavior Ex. raccoons rubbing coins tg could interfere with target response
29
conditioning depends on the reinforcer
Quantity Quality Shifts in quantity and quality
30
hutt 1954
Thirsty rats trained to press lever for Quantity Small,Medium,Large Quality - acidic, normal, sweet Increase in quantity and quality = increased responding Reinforcer shifts responding depends on expectation Positive contrast small/ bad reward→ larger/ better reward Low responding→ increase responding Negative contrast Larger / better reward→ smaller/bad reward Spoiled child used to getting big rewards so decreased responding when they get smaller ones High responding→ decreased responding
31
contiguity + contingency
****Contiguity -Temporal How long after the response does the reinforcer occur Contiguity has two T temporal or time is important Contingency -Causal Is the response necessary for the reinforcer to occur In autoshaping does a pigeon have to peck at the light? False Two Cs in contingency is causal contingency (Operant conditioning must have contingency )
32
contiguity
Reinforcer immediately after response→ better learning Why Easier to pick out correct response Closer tg more level pressing
33
how to overcome delay in reinforcement
Secondary reinforcer Marking Delay in reinforcement→ decrease in learning
34
secondary reinforcement
Connects correct response with delayed primary reinforcer CS previously associated with the reinforcer Ex: coaching, dog training, poker chips gold stars
35
marking procedure
Marks the subjects response Marking is not associated with reinforcement, but CHOICE
36
Lieberman et al - discrete operant approach
Correct arm has treat incorrect no treat → but the delay is too long to learn reinforcement Group 1 marked after correct (black) and incorrect (white) responses Marked - picked up by experimenter and places in delay box after choice Group 2 unmarked after correct (black) and incorrect (white) responses Unmarked - walk without pickup into delay box Marked rats perform better
37
B.F skinner
Pigeons received food every 15 sec Odd behaviors emerged 360 degree turning Beak tossing why Accidental reinforcement: accidental pairing of response with reinforcer Thus, skinner believed contiguity was most important
38
Staddon and simmelhag
two types of responses Interim responses: “odd” behaviors did not occur close to reinforcer (¼ turn) Terminal responses: food related behaviors occur just before reinforcer (pecking) Skinner did not account for when odd responses occurred Pecking is not superstitious, ‘it belongs’
39
controllability
Controllability→ affects learning about causality (contingency) The shuttle box: dogs hate shocks It usually has a noise our a light as a warning stimulus and then dogs rapidly learn to jump to other side
40
triadic designs
Subjects in group Y feel “helpless” compared to group R because there is no response - reinforcer contingency R group shows negative reinforcement
41
controllability (marking)
Attention deficit theory Inescapable shock→ difficulty attributing a choice to reinforcer
42
passivity in aversion theory
Repeated aversive stimulation leads to unlearned passivity
43
What if we mark the response? Maier et al
Y-M group: marking the response reversed ‘helplessness’ Marking provides contingency
44
helplessness hypothesis
Perceived lack of control over environment→ depression Reduced motivation Difficulty identifying effective behaviors
45
overcome helplessness in humans
Using marking, using a diary to track outcomes of the day, help identify choices that determine outcome, which helps change behavior