Instrumental Conditioning: Motivational Mechanisms Flashcards
motivational mechanisms: associative structure of instrumental conditioning perspective
- relies on concept of associations in Pavlovian conditioning
- molecular perspective: focuses on individual stimulus antecedents and outcome of responses related to these antecedents
- examines instrumental learning in isolated behavioural preparations
- allows framework of studying neural mechanisms of instant conditioning
- associations can be proven, substantiated, in nervous system
motivational mechanisms: response allocation approach, Skinnerian tradition
- broader context of organism’s activities
- considered from molar perspective
- “how are long term goals achieved amid all behavioural options”
- main concerns
1. how instrumental conditioning limits organism’s free flow of activities
2. consequences of these limitations
response-allocation approach limitation example
when you have a summer class, your studying schedule imposes a contingency on what you normally do; limits freedom
associative structure of instrumental conditioning
response, reinforcer, context of stimuli
- instrumental response occurs inpresence of distinctive stimuli
- e.g. turning a key in the car ignition (response) startsthe car (reinforcer); sitting in driver’s seat with key in between your fingers (context)
SR association and law of effect
- involves establishment of SR association between R and S present when response is reinforced
- does NOT involve learning about reinforcer OR response outcome (O) OR relation between and reinforcing RO outcome
- role of reinforcer: strengthen SR association
SR association and law of effect: Thorndike’s belief
- once established, SR association was solely responsible for insturmental B
- thus, motivation = activation of SR association by exposure to S present when response was previously reinforced
- characterizing habitual B leads to resurgence of interest in SR mechanisms
- these theories fell into disfavor during the cognitive revolution
habits
- 45% of human B
- automatic Bs we do the same way each time
- likely arise in pursuit of goals and particular contexts
- once acquired, these occur without goals
- reaction to stimulus context in which goal was attained previously
habits: compulsive behaviours
- drug abuse, gambling, sexual B, eating
- individuals feel driven to perform repeatedly
- contextual cues trigger them
- negative consequences are not relevant according to SR theory
expectancy of reward and SO associations
- reward expectancy is considered as motivator of instrumental B
- specification of instrumental response ensures participant will ALWAYS experience certain S in connection with making response
- stimuli may invoke multiple senses + involve distinctive place, texture, smell, sight cues
- reinforcement of instrumental response = pairing (S) with reinforcer (O)
- pairings provide potential for
1. classical conditioning
2. establishment of association between S and O
expectancy of reward and SO associations: Pavlovian process and expectancy of reward from memory
…. specification of instrumental response ensures participant will ALWAYS experience certain S in connection with making response….
- activates memory of event
- allows individuals to predict event will occur
- expect something important will occur and expect reinforcer
2 process theory
Belief: why did instrumental response increase during conditioning
1. presence of S evokes instrumental conditioning
- through SR association (Thorndike)
2. instrumental response occurs in response to SO (expectation of reward)
- assumes two types of learning: classical and instrumental
2 process theory: process
- S is associated with 0 reinforcement through Pavlovian conditioning
- results in SO association, which activates emotional state
- +/- based on appetitive or aversive reinforcer - emotional state motivates instrumental B
2 process theory: transfer
- standard instrumental conditioning phase
- lever press in reinforced with food - standard Pavlovian conditioning phase
- lever = removed from experimental chamber
- tone CS is paired with food US - critical transfer phase
- lever again available, lever press is performed to secure reward
- BUT Pavlovian CS = periodically
- if Pavlovian SO response motivates instrumental B the rate of level pressing should increase when one CS is presented
- AS PREDICTED… reward increases rate of responding because: likely positive emotion elicited by CS+ (food) summating with appetitive emotion involved in lever pressing for food
what determines transfer results in regard to 2 process theory?
- expectancies for specific rewards, rather than general positive emotional states
- the compatibility of Pavlovian CR and instrumental response
overt responses and classical conditioning
- Pavlovian conditioning can elicit overt responses
- sign tracking (tendency to interact with cue that predicts reward
e.g. increased lever pressing during CS show that independently established SO association can facilitate instrumental responding reinforced by that O.
because response levers = removed during Pavlovian phase, no SR association could have been learned during that phase
agonists vs antagonists
refer to page 12 of notebook, slides 13, 14, 15 of powerpoint
dopaminergic pathway
- principally involved in reward (mesolimbic system)
- formed by projections (axons) of midbrain dopamine neurons of VTA
- when rewarding stimuli = experienced …
1. dopaminergic mesolimbic system = activated
2. causes release of DA to targeted nuclei (notably NAcc) - VTA neurons project to several limbic structures
1. NAcc
2. amygdala
3. striatum
4. PFC
5. hippocampus
ventral striatum and reward
heterogenous mix of a few different brain structures
- NA + caudate + putamen + olfactory tubercle
- all structures (notably NA) play roles in decision making to respond to reward and motivation
ventral striatum + NA RECEIVE afferents from basolatera; amygdala, hippocampal formation, PFC; projects to lateral hypothalamus and ventral pallidum (VP)
basal and lateral amygdala roles
convey info about stimuli that predicts occurence of reinforcers
amygdala + ventral striatum connectivity
- connectivity between amygdala + ventral striatum = important in translation of emotion and motivational effects of stimuli to behavioural output
- glutamatergic inputs from amygdala to ventral striatum work together with ascending dopamine system
4 major dopaminergic pathways
- mesolimbic pathway
- mesocortical pathway
- nigrostriatal pathway
- tuberoinfundibular pathway
mesolimbic pathway
- transmits dopamine from VTA to ventral striatum
- reward-related cognition, aversion-related cognition
- incentive salience: “wanting”
- pleasure (“liking”) response from certain stimuli
- reinforcement
- associated disorders: ADHD, schizophrenia, addiction
mesocortical pathway
- transmits DA from VTA to PFC
- executive functions
- associated disorders: ADHD, schizophrenia, addiction
nigrostriatal pathway
- transmits dopaminergic neurons from zona compacta of substantia niagra to caudate nucleus and putamen
- associated processes
1. motor function
2. reward-related cognition
3. associative learning - associated disorders: addiction, chorea, Huntington’s, shizophrenia, ADHD, tourette’s, Parkinson’s
in schizophrenia, what are the pathways most notably involved and what are the effects of the presence of DA?
mesolimbic pathway (VTA to NAcc)
- surplus of DA
- results in positive symptoms
mesocortical pathway (VTA to PFC)
- not enough DA
- results in negative symptoms