Institutions Finals Flashcards
The basics of the EP
- Outlined in art. 14 TEU and art. 223 ff. TFEU
- The only directly elected body of the EU
- Elected for a term of five years by direct universal suffrage in a free and secret ballot since 1979
- 705 seats, plus 1 President, currently Roberta Metsola. Before Brexit there were 750 seats
The History of the EP
- Established as the Common Assembly of the ECSC, then consisting of representatives of MS’ parliaments. Had the power to dismiss the HA
- Renamed to the EP in 1957
Given budgetary powers in 1970/1975 - Directly elected in 1979
- First only to be consulted in the legislative procedure
- Since Maastricht, introduction of the co-decision procedure in many areas
- Since Maastricht, the right to approve/reject the COM as a whole; right to control COM by inquiries
- In 1997, the right to approve/reject President of the COM
- Since Lisbon, EC has to ‘take into account’ the elections of the EP when proposing COM president
The three main functions of EP
- Legislative functions - jointly with the council in most (but not all) policy areas
- Power of the purse - EP shares authority over the EU budget with the Council
- Supervision of other EU institutions, in particular the COM (motion of censure)
Two types of procedures for legislation in EP
- Ordinary legislative procedure, Art. 294 TFEU. consent between EP and Council with the Council acting by QMV
- Special legislative procedure, Art 289 TFEU. In specific cases provided for by the Treaties, the adoption of something by the EP with the Council, shall constitute a special legislative procedure. This can be invoked by both the EP and Council, but would need the approval/consent/consultation of the other body.
How does EP legislate?
- EP participates in policy discussions with the COM at the pre-proposal legislative stage
- EP can formally adopt its own ideas for suggested legislation
- Annual budgetary cycle provides opportunities to exercise legislative influence
- EP can influence the COM’s annual work and legislative programme
- EP’s views must be sought if legislation concerns sensitive, important, significant matters
How is EP relevant to the budget?
- Multiannual financial frameworks, every 7 years
- Annual budgets:
- Right to propose modification to compulsory expenditure
- Right to propose amendments to non-compulsory expenditure
- Right of approval or rejection, with the Council, over the whole budget
How does EP supervise the COM?
- Powers in relation to the COM president
- Power of approval of Commissioner-designate
- Power of dismissal of the COM, vote on censure with ⅔ majority needed
- Outlined in art 233 and 318 TFEU
- Committee on Budgetary Control (could be powerful, but is often understaffed)
- Questions
- Special committees (e.g. tax rulings)
- Questions can be asked of the Commission
How does the EP supervise the Council?
- Presidency of the Council appears before the EP plenaries
- Ministers from the presidency attend EP committees and plenary debates
- EP can ask questions of the Council through the presidency
- Power of consent over international treaties
Elections of the EP
- Direct elections since 1979
- Elections do not take place on the same day everywhere
- Seats are distributed according to ‘degressive proportionality’. The number of citizens represented by an EP increases as the size of the MS increases. At least 6 MEPs and no more than 96.
- MEPs are organized in parliamentary groups
Political parties in the EP
- Transnational federations; principle weakness is that they are not part of the day to day activities and lack focus.
- Political groups in the EP; internal divisions and lack of ability to direct their members. In order to create a group you need at least 23 members, representing various MS to create a group
- National parties; are often involved in EP-related activities. The election campaigns for the parties in the EP are essentially national issues and the national parties get to pick the candidates
The problems with MEPs in the EP
- It does not have a leading party who creates a government and an opposition who questions and oversees them, like you have in national parliaments
- An MEP is both a part of a national party as well as part of the larger EP part, so there is a division of loyalties
Committees of the EP
- EP has the power to create committees to scrutinize legislation
- There are 20 committees and three subcommittees with 14 to 20 members
- When legislation is send to EP, they send it to the appropriate committee
- The committee then drafts a report
- It goes to the plenary sessions of the EP, where the rapporteur is the principle spokesperson explaining what the committee thinks of the legislation; how it should be changed, etc.
- If it is not passed the first stage, there will be a second reading
Factors determining the influence of EP committees
- Significance of the policy area within the EU system
- The extent of EU policy development
- EP’s power within the policy area
- Committee expertise
- Committee chairmanship
- Committee cohesiveness
Examples of assertion of power by the EP
- Forced resignation of the Santer Commission in 1999
- Forced re-designation of the Barroso Commission in 2004
- Rejection of the SWIFT agreement with the US in 2010
- Rejection of the ACTA agreement
The basics of the CJEU
- Established in 1952 as the Court of Justice of the ECSC
- Seated in Luxembourg
- Judicial branch of the EU: shall ensure that in the interpretation and application of the Treaties the law is observed
- The Court of Justice and the General Court. There are also specialized courts attached to the GC, article 257 TFEU
What is the composition of the CJEU
- 27 judges, one from each MS. appointed for 6 years, with the term renewable once; Art 253 TFEU
- Judges do not give concurring or dissenting opinions
- Supported by 11 Advocates General: making reasoned submissions (‘opinions’) on particular cases
- The Court may sit as a full court, in a Grand Chamber of 15 judges or in Chambers of three or five Judges (article 16 of the Statute of the Court)
Composition of the GC
- 54 judges, two from each MS
- The GC does not have permanent AG’s. that task may, in exceptional circumstances, be carried out by a Judge (art. 49 of the Statute)
- May sit as a full court, as a Grand chamber (15 Judges), as a chamber of five or three judges or as a single judge, art. 50 of the Statute
Jurisdiction of the CJEU
- Art 218: opinions concerning international agreements
- Art 256 subpara 2: appeals against decisions of the GC
- Art 258-260: infringement procedure
- Art 267: preliminary reference
- Art 269L determination of a serious breach by a MS → article 7 TEU
Jurisdiction of the GC
- Art 263: actions for annulment; reviewing the legality of legislative acts by CoM, COM and ECB in accordance with the treaties. The action of annulment is invoked by various actors other than the court, including certain organs of the EU, but also legal persons living in the EU.
- Art 265: actions for failure to act
- Art 268: compensation for damages according to Art 340
- Art 270: disputes between the Union and its servants (Civil Service Tribunal)
- Art 272: judgment pursuant to an arbitration clause
Procedure when MS does not adhere to EU law?
- COM sends a letter of formal notice asking for further information and gives a deadline to give an answer
- If COM concludes the MS is failing its obligation under EU law, it may send a reasoned opinion: a formal request to comply with EU law
- If the MS still does not comply the COM may decide to refer the matter to the COJ. most cases are settled before the COJ gets involved
- If an MS fails to communicate measures that implement the provisions of a directive in time, the COM may ask the COJ to impose penalties
- If the court finds that a MS has breached EU law, the national authorities must take action to comply with COJ judgment
The preliminary reference procedure
- The most common thing the COJ is busy with
- Not an appeal system, but a mechanism of cooperation/dialogue between MS courts and CJEU, therefore the CJEU answers these cases in abstract terms and leaves the concrete application of the law to the national court
- COJ has jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning: the interpretations of the Treaties, and the validity and interpretation of the acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union
- What rulings go to the COJ is decided by any court of tribunal in the Union, this is dependent on their discretion, except for when they investigate the validity of an EU law provision, then they are under duty to refer the case the CJEU
- CJEU does not decide the case between the parties; the case is still decided by the national court
The three exceptions when a court does not have to refer to COJ
- The irrelevance of the question raised
- Acte clair: “the correct application of Community law may be so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt as to the manner in which the question raised is to be resolved”
- Acte eclaire: “A court that would normally be under a duty to submit the preliminary reference may refrain from doing so if the question raised is materially identical with a question which has already been the subject of a preliminary ruling in a similar case”
The Preliminary reference procedure has three principal purposes
- To provide national courts with assistance on questions regarding the interpretation of EU law
- To contribute a uniform application of EU law across the union
- To create an additional mechanism, on top of the action for annulment of an EU act, for an ex post verification of the conformity of acts of the EU institutions with primary EU law