Insanity Flashcards
What is everyone presumed to be?
Sane
Have free will - choose course of action
Defence tries to distinguish between the responsible + those lacking responsibility
What is the defence also known as?
Insane automatism
What type of definition is insanity?
Takes a legal definition - little to do with a medical one
What type of defence is insanity?
Name a case that illustrates this point
General defence
Used for any crime, including summary
- R v Horseferry Road Magistrates; Court ex parte K (1996)
Can be a complete defence, so long as required MR wasn’t formed
What verdict does a successful plea of insanity lead to?
Jury return a special verdict of NG by reason of insanity
Judge makes an order (apart form murder, compulsory detention in mental hospital, release on authority of Home Secretary)
Cts still have power over you
NOT the same as an acquittal
Before the Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to plead) Act 1991 what did a successful plea result in?
Compulsory detention in a mental hospital
VERY LIMITED + RESTRICTIVE
What has the Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to pleas) Act 1991 been amended + replaced by?
Domestic Violence Crime + Victims Act 2004
What does the Domestic Violence Crime + Victims Act 2004, give judges the power to make, if there is a successful plea of insanity?
For offences other than murder a judge may make:
- Hospital Order (with/ without restrictions)
- Supervison Order
- Absolute discharge
Also introduced limit on judge’s discretion - can’t make hospital/ restriction order wither medical evidence (also applies to murder cases)
This change is seen as being in line with the HRA 1998
If a D pleads insanity, who had the burden of proof?
D must prove insanity on a balance of probabilities
Prosecution can call evidence to try + prove D = insane where they HAVEN’T pleaded insanity
Under the 2004 Act, when is a judge allowed to make a hospital/ restriction order?
If they have evidence to support the need for the order
For safety of D + public
Seen to be in line with the HRA 1998
If a D raises the defence of automatism, what issue can a judge rise?
Issue of insanity
What is automatism?
Separate defence BUT relevant to insanity
Very little legal meaning, describes sense of unconsciousness
Successful plea results in acquittal
What case laid down the rules of insanity?
Describe the case
M’Naghten (1843) HL - common law
D had obsession with PM + attempted to murder him
Killed secretary by mistake
Ct acquitted him on grounds of insanity
Due to public + media outcry, HL was asked to clarify legal rules on insanity as a defence
3 principles that must be proved to claim insanity
What are the 3 principles that must be proven to claim insanity from the M’Naghten rules?
Must be established that at time of the offence, D was suffering from:
- Defect of reason
- Caused by disease of the mind
- So either D didn’t know what he was doing/ didn’t know it was wrong
What does a ‘defect of reason’ mean?
Name a case to illustrate this
Complete loss of reasoning power
Mere forgetfulness/ absent mindedness/ failing to use reasoning powers = insufficient
R v Clarke (1972) CA - stealing from supermarket
Describe the case of R v Clarke (1972) CA
D charged with stealing form supermarket
D argued she had no intention of stealing
Had been acting absentmindedly; suffering from diabetes + depression
Judge ruled insanity = appropriate defence
D pleaded G to avoid insanity finding
On appeal, theft conviction = quashed
Not deprived of reasoning powers, just failed to use them
BUT D didn’t have MR for theft
What is a ‘disease of the mind’?
Legal term NOT medical term
ID of psychiatric illness isn’t enough
Covers states of minds the doctors wouldn’t necessarily say are diseased of the mind
Legal terms: malfunctioning of the mind
Not confined to disease of brain alone, any malfunctioning of mind caused by something within body will do
Shown in R v Kemp (1957)
Describe the case of R v Kemp (1957)
D suffered from arteriosclerosis (hardening arteries)
Caused problems with blood supply to brain, temporary blackouts
Attacked wife with hammer causing serious injury during one of these
Charged s20 GBH
Found NG by reason of insanity
Appeal: Ct upheld the finding; law = concerned with the mind, not the brain
= no distinction between a disease of the mind + a disease of the body affecting the mind
How did Lord Denning describe the defence of automatism in the case of Bratty v Attorney General for N. Ireland (1963)?
‘An act which is done by the muscles without any control of the mind such as a spasm or a reflex action, or an act done b someone who isn’t conscious of what he is doing’
What did Lord Devlin say about a disease of the mind?
‘Condition of the brain = IRRELEVANT + so the Q is whether the condition =curable/ incurable, transistor or permanent’
Describe the case of R v Coley (2013)
What was held in this case?
D = regular cannabis user
Whilst on cannabis, went to neighbour’s house
Stabbed her partner causing serious injuries
D claimed he’d suffered ‘psychotic episode’
Ct: when assessing whether there was a disease of the mind, intoxicants taken voluntarily cannot cause such an event
PROMTES PUBLIC POLICY