Insanity Flashcards

1
Q

Who does the burden of proof lie with for Insanity?

A

The defence

Balance of probabilities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is Insanity a full defence if proven?

A

Yes but can lead to defendant being sent to hospital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What Act and Year covers Insanity?

A

Criminal Justice (Insanity and Unfitness to Plea) Act 1991

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What case laid out insanity?

A

M’naughten - tried to kill PM but killed member of staff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the three points laid out in M’naughten?

A
  1. Suffered from defect of reason
  2. Disease of mind
  3. Not know nature or quality of act/did not know what he was doing was wrong
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What 2 cases relate to the first point of Insanity?

A

R v Clarke
R v Sullivan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Clarke?

A

Failed to consider properly didn’t lack ability - suffering with depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Sullivan?

A

Does not matter if defect is temporary or permanent - epileptic fit - epileptic fit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Does not matter if defect is temporary or permanent - epileptic fit - epileptic fit

A

Kemp - arteriosclerosis
Sullivan - epilepsy
Hennessy - diabetes
Burgess - sleepwalking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Kemp?

A

Suffered arteriosclerosis - temporary blackouts

Introduced internal and external factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Sullivan?

A

Epileptic fit - mental faculties impaired

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Burgess?

A

Attacked girlfriend while sleepwalking - not automatism as internal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Quick?

A

Hypoglycaemia - not eating after insulin - automatism -

Hypoglycaemia can’t be self induced for defence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Hennessy?

A

Failed to take insulin - disease itself without insulin that caused unlike Quick

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Coley, McGhee and Harris?

A

Consumed cannabis - psychotic episode due to cannabis - external factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Third point of Insanity?

A

Did not know nature and quality of act/did not know what he was doing was wrong

17
Q

What three cases relate to the third point of Insanity?

A

R v Johnson
R Coley, McGhee and Harris
R v Keal

18
Q

R v Johnson?

A

D stabbed V - knew what he had done was legally wrong - defence not available

19
Q

R v Coley McGhee and Harris?

A

Stopped binge drinking - set house on fire - knew what they where doing as removed documents before burning house

20
Q

R v Keal?

A

Defence not available if knew where wrong but believed they had no choice but to commit it