Injury Models Flashcards
What does aetiology mean?
The cause
What are the main models of injury cause and prevention which have progressed from 1990 to present?
- [von Mechelen et al]
- Finch
- Meeuwise (1994)
- Bahr and Krosshaug (2005)
- Meeuwise (2007)
- Windt and Gabbett
What were the 4 steps of von Mechelen’s model of injury cause and prevention?
- Establish the extent of the injury
- Establish the aetiology and mechanism of the injury
- Introduce a preventative measure
- Assess effectiveness by repeating step 1
How did Finch adapt van Mechelen’s model of injury prevention?
What was this called?
Translated research into injury prevention practice
Steps re context added to end:
- Describe intervention context to inform implementation strategies
- Evaluate effectiveness of preventative measures in implementation context
TRIPP - translating research into injury prevention pratice
Why did Finch adapt Van Mechelen’s approach to understanding injury cause and prevention?
Adapted to ensure preventative measures identified can be adopted by sports national governing bodies and their athletes
Which aspect of Mechelen’s model did Meeuwise (1994) develop and how?
Causation (2nd) stage
Considered balance between:
1. STRESS (imposed by external/extrinsic risk factors); and
2. CAPACITY (determined by a person’s internal factors)
If these are balanced - person remains uninjured
If inciting event occurs increasing external risk factors - injury may occur
Give an example of acute and chronic inciting events
Tackle (acute)
Excessive training/mileage (chronic)
Hoe did Bahr and Krosshaug (2005) develop the causation stage of Mechelen’s model?
Emphasised that injury is often caused by a complex interaction of risk factors, rather than a single factor
Examples of internal risk factors (8) (as extended by Bahr and Krosshaug)?
- Age
- Sex
- Body composition
- Health
- Physical fitness
- Anatomy
- Skill level
8.Psychological factors
Examples of external risk factors?
- Sports factors
- Protective equipment
- Sports equipment
- Environment
How did Meeuwise further adapt Mechelen’s model in 2007
Model become DYNAMIC e.g.
- No injury - strength adaptations may make individual less susceptible to inciting events
- Following recovery - intrinsic risk factors may change, possibly making the individual more susceptible to injury
How did Windt & Gabbett adapt Mechelen’s model?
Highlighted that workload was missing from the model
- not itself a risk factor but instead a vehicle by which individuals and exposed to risk factors and inciting events
Who split internal risk factors into 2 categories and what were those categories?
Windt and Gabbett
- Modifiable (e.g. strength)
- Not modifiable (e.g. age)