Injures with Intent to injure Flashcards

1
Q

Act and section

A

S189(2) CA 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Penalty

A

5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ingredients

A

With Intent to Injure anyone
OR
with reckless disregard for the safety of others

Injures

Any Person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Injures Intent definition and case law

A

In a criminal law context there are two specific types of intention in an offence. Firstly there must be an intention to commit the act and secondly, an intention to get a specific result.

The nature of the blow and the gash which it produced on the complainant’s head would point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent.
R v Taisalika

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Injures Definition and case Law

A

means to cause actual bodily harm.
Sec. 2, Crimes Act 1961

’Bodily harm’ … includes any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of [the victim] … it need not be permanent, but must, no doubt, be more than merely transitory and trifling.
R v Donovan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

With reckless disregard for the safety of others definition and case law

A

While it is necessary to prove that the defendant foresaw the risk of injury to others, it is not necessary that he recognised the extent of the injury that would result.

Recklessness means the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk. In New Zealand it involves proof that the consequence complained of could well happen, together with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardless of risk.

R v Harney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Any Person definition

A

Gender neutral. Proven by judicial or by circumstantial evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly