Injunctions Flashcards
injunction
- orders defendant to either do something or refrain from something
- most popular
2 types of injunctions
- prohibitory
- prevent a threatened wrong or injury
- mandatory
- redress an injury that has already happened
how judge decides on injunction
- Judge will balance the hardships when deciding whether to give an injunction.
- given at the discretion of the court.
- judge will consider the interests of both sides before issuing an injunction
tortious conduct
- most injunctive relief is based around tortious conduct
- must determine if the tort involved is one for which injunctive relief is available
- violation of a statute will also be subject to injunction
tortious conduct where equitable injunctions are normally available
- continuous or repeated trespass
- conversion of a unique chattel
- to stop unfair competition
injunctions tortious conduct where injunctions may be available
- to eliminate a nuisance
- nuisance must be private, not public
- to prevent waste (damage to real property)
- but not if the waste is ameliorative
tortious conduct where injunctions may be available
nuisance
- Definition: harmful or dangerous situation.
- private nuisance: affects the plaintiff directly and personally.
- e.g. smoke and particulate from a nearby factory.
- public nuisance: situations where someone is engaging in some form of improper behavior, but it is not directly affecting or targeting plaintiff.
- in these situations, commonwealth’s attorney will prosecute, so injunctions are not allowed
tortious conduct where injunctions may be available
to prevent waste
- defendant is actively damaging the property or allowing the damage to happen without action
- can’t enjoin to stop ameliorative waste
- ameliorative= changes the property but in a way that increases the land’s value
tortious conduct where injunctions are typically not available
- defamation
- commercial defamation (trade libel)
- invasion of privacy
- Exception: involves unauthorized use of a person’s name or likeness.
- Virginia statute allows for injunctive relief in this case (only IoP tort VA recognizes)
- rationale for all three: constitutional concerns about “prior restraint”
criminal proceedings
- equity will not enjoin pending criminal proceedings
- will enjoin threatened criminal proceedings only under extraordinary circumstances
temporary (preliminary) injunctive relief
- granted at the beginning of the litigation
- purpose is to either:
- preserve the status quo
- or prevent irreparable injury that will happen during the litigation before the final judgment.
temporary (preliminary) injunctive relief
4 factors the court will consider when determining whether to grant temporary injunction
- substantial likelihood that the moving party will actually win the merits of the lawsuit.
- irreparable harm to the moving party unless status quo maintained.
- harm to the moving party outweighs the hardship the injunction would cause to the restrained party.
- the public interest will not be adversely affected by the injunction.
- e.g. injunction to shut down a factory and putting a lot of people out of work.
temporary (preliminary) injunctive relief
4 consideration factors
substantial likelihood of success
must be unlikely that injunction will be shown to be wrongfully granted by the end of the case.
temporary (preliminary) injunctive relief
4 consideration factors
irrepairable harm
harm looked at by court only limited to the harm plaintiff will incur during the course of the litigation
temporary (preliminary) injunctive relief
4 consideration factors
harm outweighs hardship of injunction
- Example:
- costs for waiting to perform a contracting job
- other customers of defendant held back by this issue
- costs for waiting to perform a contracting job
- Procedural requirements:
- plaintiff must post a bond that would cover defendant’s losses if improperly enjoined.
- amount will vary depending on possible hardship.
- exception: real covenants.
- where plaintiff sues upon a real property covenant that the defendant is violating.
- Here, P doesn’t need to show harm and D cannot escape njunction unless he shows exceptional harm would result from granting of an injunction
- plaintiff must post a bond that would cover defendant’s losses if improperly enjoined.