Informal Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

When an arguer poses a conclusion to a disputant and says or implies that some harm will come to her if she does not accept the conclusion

Example: My restaurant deserves a AAA health rating. Vito Corleone thinks my restaurant is the cleanest he’s ever been in.

A

Appeal to Force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When an arguer attempts to support a conclusion by merely evoking pity from the reader or listener

Example: Jones’ family would suffer if s/he were put to death. Hence, Jones does not meet the legal criterion for being subjected to the death penalty

A

Appeal to Pity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When an arguer, addressing a large group of people, excites the emotions and enthusiasm of the crowd to win acceptance for her conclusion

A

Appeal to the People (direct)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When the arguer aims his appeal at one or more individuals separately focusing on some aspect of their relation to the crowd

Example: Most Canadians now believe marijuana is harmless. Therefore, marijuana is harmless

A

Appeal to the People (indirect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When one person advances an argument and another responds by directing her attention not to the argument but to the person herself

when the 2nd person verbally abuses the 1st

Example: Trudeau says we should have gun control. But he’s dishonest, hence Gun control is not permissible

A

Argument Against the Person (abusive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

when one person advances an argument and another responds by directing her attention not to the argument by to the person herself

when the 2nd person hopes to show the 1st was predisposed to argue the way he does and should therefore not be taken seriously

Example: Mulcair supports mandatory union membership. But Mulcair has an interest in courting the union vote. Hence, mandatory union membership is wrong.

A

Argument Against the Person (circumstantial)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when one person advances an argument and another responds by directing her attention not to the argument by to the person herself

when the 2nd arguer attempts to make the 1st person appear to be hypocritical or arguing in bad faith

Example: Dr. Smith says smoking is dangerous, but Dr. Smith smokes. Hence, smoking is not dangerous

A

Argument Against the Person (tu quoque)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

when a general rule is applied to a specific case it was not intended to cover

Example: Autonomy of action is one of our most important rights. Hence, preventing me from punching you in the nose would be wrong.

A

Accident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When an arguer distorts an opponent’s argument for the purpose of more easily attacking it

Example: Alward says Nova Scotians should be allowed to teach in Saskatchewan classrooms. Clearly he thinks that Saskatchewan students need to learn about cod fishing from people with funny accents. But that is the last thing Saskatchewan students need to learn.

A

Strawman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when the premises of an argument support one conclusion but a different – often vaguely related – conclusion is drawn

Example: Theft and robbery have been increasing at an alarming rate. Hence, we should reinstate the death penalty

A

Missing the Point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When the arguer diverts the attention of the listener by changing the subject to a different but subtly related one

Example: The statistics showing seatbelts make you safer are flawed. After all, forcing people to use seatbelts is an infringement of liberty. It’s the first step to authoritarian government.

A

Red Herring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When the premises of an state that nothing has been proved one way or the other about something and the conclusion then makes a definite conclusion about that thing

Example: It cannot be proven that there are no ghosts - Ghosts exist (conclusion)

A

Appeal to Ignorance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When the sample used to draw a conclusion about all members of a group is not representative of the group

Example: All of the guests at Graceland Hotel in Memphis think Elvis is still alive - Most Americans think Elvis is still alive (conclusion)

A

Hasty Generalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When the conclusion of an argument rest upon an alleged chain reaction when there is not sufficient reason to think the chain reaction will occur

Example: Legalizing assisted suicide will lead to a lessened respect for life
• This will lead to acceptance of killing people more generally
▪ This will lead to acceptance of policies whereby the government systematically eliminates people with undesirable traits
• This will lead to an oppressive authoritarian state
• Assisted suicide should not be legalized.

A

Slippery Slope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When a single question which is really two (or more) questions is asked and a single answer is then applied to both questions

Example: Have you stopped drinking beer for breakfast yet?

A

Complex Question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When a disjunctive premise presents two unlikely alternatives as if they were the only ones available

Example: Either Alward gives me an A in this class or he destroys my future - Alward won’t destroy my future - Alward will give me an A

A

False Dichotomy

17
Q

When the conclusion of an argument depends on the fact that a word or phrase is used in two different senses in the argument

Example: A bank is a safe place to leave your money (financial) - Banks are public unguarded areas (river bed) - Public unguarded areas are safe places to leave your money

A

Equivocation

18
Q

When an arguer misinterprets a syntactically ambiguous statement and then draws a conclusion based on this faulty interpretation

Example: Thrifty people save old cardboard boxes and waste paper - Thrifty people waste paper

A

Amphiboly

19
Q

When the conclusion of an argument depends on the erroneous transference of an attribute from the parts of something onto the whole

Example: Alward likes beer. - Alward likes granola cereal. - Alward likes granola cereal with beer on it .

A

Composition

20
Q

When the conclusion of an argument depends on the erroneous transference of an attribute from a whole onto its parts

Example: Salt is a nonpoisonous compound. - The components of salt, sodium and chlorine, are nonpoisonous.

A

Division