INFLUENCES OF EARLY ATTACHMENT ON LATER RELATIONSHIPS Flashcards

1
Q

INTERNAL WORKING MODEL

A
  • template for future relationships
  • a child whose first experience is of a loving relationship with a reliable caregiver will tend to assume that this i show relationships are meant to be
  • they will then seek out functional relationships and behave functionally within them, i.e without being too uninvolved or too emotionally close (Type A) or being controlling and argumentative (Type C)
  • a child with bad experiences of their first attachment will bring these bad experiences into later relationships
  • they may struggle to form relationships in the first place or they may not behave appropriately when they have them, displaying type A or C behaviour towards friends and partners
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

RELATIONSHIPS IN LATER CHILDHOOD

A
  • attachment type = associated with the quality of peer relationships in childhood
  • SECURELY attached infants tend to go on to form the best quality childhood friendships whereas INSECURELY attached infants later have friendship difficulties
  • bullying behaviour can be predicted by attachment type
    MYRON-WILSON & SMITH (1998) assessed attachment type and bullying involvement using standard questionnaires in 196 children aged 7-11 in London
  • secure children = unlikely to be involved
  • insecure-avoidant = most likely to be VICTIMS
  • insecure-resistant = most likely to be BULLIES
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

RELATIONSHIPS IN ADULTHOOD WITH ROMANTIC PARTNERS

A

MCCARTHY (1999) studied 40 adult women who had been assessed when they were infants to establish their early attachment type
- securely attached = best adult friendships and romantic relationships
- insecure-resistant = problems maintaining friendships
- insecure-avoidant = struggled with intimacy in romantic relationships

HAZAN & SHAVER (1987):
- analysed 620 replies to a ‘love quiz’ printed in an American newspaper
- first section assessed respondents’ current or most important relationship
- second section assessed general love experiences such as no. of partners
- third section assessed attachment type by asking them to choose which of 3 statements best described their feelings
FINDINGS:
- 56% = secure –> most likely to have good and long lasting romantic experiences
- 25% = insecure-avoidant –> reveal jealousy and fear of intimacy
- 19% = insecure-resistant
- suggests patterns of attachment behaviour are reflected in romantic relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

RELATIONSHIPS IN ADULTHOOD AS A PARENT

A
  • IWM affects child’s ability to parents their own children
  • ppl tend to base parenting style on their IWM, so attachment type tends to be passed on through generations
    BAILEY (2007): majority of women had the same attachment classification both to their babies and their own mothers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

AO3: EVIDENCE ON CONTINUITY OF ATTACHMENT TYPE IS MIXED

A
  • IWM predicts continuity between security of infant attachment and its later relationships
  • some studies (McCarthy) do appear to support continuity and provide evidence of IWM
  • not all studies support IWM: ZIMMERMAN (2000) assessed infant attachment type and adolescent attachment to parents
  • very little relationship between quality of infant and adolescent attachment
  • problem because it is not what we would expect if IWMs was important in development
  • LOW INTERNAL VALIDITY
  • LIMITED EXPLANATION
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

AO3: MOST STUDIES HAVE ISSUES OF VALIDITY

A
  • most studies do not make use of Strange Situation but assess infant-parent attachment by means of interview or questionnaire, not in infancy but years later –> VALIDITY PROBLEMS
  • assessment relies on self-report techniques : interview or questionnaires –> limited validity as they depend on respondents being honest and having a realistic view of their own relationships
  • related problem concerns the retrospective nature of infant attachment
  • looking back in adulthood at one’s early relationship to a primary attachment figure lacks validity as it relies on accurate recollections
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

AO3: CORRELATION DOES NOT EQUAL CAUSATION

A
  • in studies where attachment type is associated with the quality of later relationships, the implication is that infant attachment type CAUSES the attachment
  • however, there are alternative explanations for the continuity that exists: a THIRD environmental factor such as parenting style may have a direct effect on both attachment and the child’s ability to form relationships with others
  • or the child’s temperament may influence both infant attachment and quality of later relationships
  • COUNTERS BOWLBY’s view that the IWM caused these outcomes
  • by stating it is caused by the IWM: DETERMINISTIC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly