INFLUENCES OF EARLY ATTACHMENT ON LATER RELATIONSHIPS Flashcards
INTERNAL WORKING MODEL
- template for future relationships
- a child whose first experience is of a loving relationship with a reliable caregiver will tend to assume that this i show relationships are meant to be
- they will then seek out functional relationships and behave functionally within them, i.e without being too uninvolved or too emotionally close (Type A) or being controlling and argumentative (Type C)
- a child with bad experiences of their first attachment will bring these bad experiences into later relationships
- they may struggle to form relationships in the first place or they may not behave appropriately when they have them, displaying type A or C behaviour towards friends and partners
RELATIONSHIPS IN LATER CHILDHOOD
- attachment type = associated with the quality of peer relationships in childhood
- SECURELY attached infants tend to go on to form the best quality childhood friendships whereas INSECURELY attached infants later have friendship difficulties
- bullying behaviour can be predicted by attachment type
MYRON-WILSON & SMITH (1998) assessed attachment type and bullying involvement using standard questionnaires in 196 children aged 7-11 in London - secure children = unlikely to be involved
- insecure-avoidant = most likely to be VICTIMS
- insecure-resistant = most likely to be BULLIES
RELATIONSHIPS IN ADULTHOOD WITH ROMANTIC PARTNERS
MCCARTHY (1999) studied 40 adult women who had been assessed when they were infants to establish their early attachment type
- securely attached = best adult friendships and romantic relationships
- insecure-resistant = problems maintaining friendships
- insecure-avoidant = struggled with intimacy in romantic relationships
HAZAN & SHAVER (1987):
- analysed 620 replies to a ‘love quiz’ printed in an American newspaper
- first section assessed respondents’ current or most important relationship
- second section assessed general love experiences such as no. of partners
- third section assessed attachment type by asking them to choose which of 3 statements best described their feelings
FINDINGS:
- 56% = secure –> most likely to have good and long lasting romantic experiences
- 25% = insecure-avoidant –> reveal jealousy and fear of intimacy
- 19% = insecure-resistant
- suggests patterns of attachment behaviour are reflected in romantic relationships
RELATIONSHIPS IN ADULTHOOD AS A PARENT
- IWM affects child’s ability to parents their own children
- ppl tend to base parenting style on their IWM, so attachment type tends to be passed on through generations
BAILEY (2007): majority of women had the same attachment classification both to their babies and their own mothers
AO3: EVIDENCE ON CONTINUITY OF ATTACHMENT TYPE IS MIXED
- IWM predicts continuity between security of infant attachment and its later relationships
- some studies (McCarthy) do appear to support continuity and provide evidence of IWM
- not all studies support IWM: ZIMMERMAN (2000) assessed infant attachment type and adolescent attachment to parents
- very little relationship between quality of infant and adolescent attachment
- problem because it is not what we would expect if IWMs was important in development
- LOW INTERNAL VALIDITY
- LIMITED EXPLANATION
AO3: MOST STUDIES HAVE ISSUES OF VALIDITY
- most studies do not make use of Strange Situation but assess infant-parent attachment by means of interview or questionnaire, not in infancy but years later –> VALIDITY PROBLEMS
- assessment relies on self-report techniques : interview or questionnaires –> limited validity as they depend on respondents being honest and having a realistic view of their own relationships
- related problem concerns the retrospective nature of infant attachment
- looking back in adulthood at one’s early relationship to a primary attachment figure lacks validity as it relies on accurate recollections
AO3: CORRELATION DOES NOT EQUAL CAUSATION
- in studies where attachment type is associated with the quality of later relationships, the implication is that infant attachment type CAUSES the attachment
- however, there are alternative explanations for the continuity that exists: a THIRD environmental factor such as parenting style may have a direct effect on both attachment and the child’s ability to form relationships with others
- or the child’s temperament may influence both infant attachment and quality of later relationships
- COUNTERS BOWLBY’s view that the IWM caused these outcomes
- by stating it is caused by the IWM: DETERMINISTIC