Influence of attachments Flashcards

1
Q

Define maternal deprivation.

A

The emotional and intellectual consequences of separation between a child and their primary attachment figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the difference between separation and deprivation?

A

Separation simply means the child not being in the presence of the primary attachment figure.This only becomes an issue for development if the child is deprived, e.g. loses an element of care.
Extended separations can lead to deprivation, which by definition causes harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How long is the critical period?

A

The first 30 months.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happens if a child is absent of a primary caregiver or suitable substitute during the critical period?

A

If a child is separated from their mother in the absence of suitable substitute care and so deprived of her emotional care for an extended period of time during this critical period then Bowlby believed psychological damage was inevitable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What effects on intellectual development does maternal deprivation have?

A
  • They may suffer delayed intellectual development, characterised by an abnormally low IQ.
  • E.G. Goldfarb had found lower IQ in children who had remained in institutions as opposed to those who were fostered and thus had a higher standard of emotional care.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What effects on emotional development does maternal deprivation have?

A
  • Bowlby identified affectionless psychopathy as the inability to experience guilt or strong emotions for others.
  • This prevents a person from developing normal relationships and is associated with criminality.
  • Affectionless psychopaths cannot appreciate the feelings of the victims and therefore lack remorse.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the procedure of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?

A
  • 44 criminal teenagers accused of stealing.
  • All interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy, characterised by: a lack of guilt about their actions, a lack of affection and lack of empathy for their victims.
  • Their families were also interviewed in order to establish whether or not the ‘thieves’ had prolonged early separations from their mothers.
  • A control group of non-criminal but emotional disturbed young people was set up to see how often maternal separation/deprivation occurred in the children who were not thieves.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the findings of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?

A
  • 14 out of the 44 thieves could be described as affectionless psychopaths.
  • Of this 14, 12 had experienced prolonged separation from their mothers in the first 2 years of their lives.
  • In the control group, only 2 out of 44 had experienced prolonged separations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

State 4 criticisms of Bowlby’s maternal deprivation theory.

A

The evidence may be poor:
- WW2 (traumatised and poor after care).
- Poor quality orphanages (deprived of multiple aspects of care, not just maternal).
- 44 thieves (researcher bias, Bowlby conducted assessments himself).
Counter evidence:
- Lewis (44 thieves replication with 500 young people).
Critical period is more of a sensitive period:
- Czechoslovakia twins
Deprivation vs privation:
- Rutter
- Privation = failure to form an attachment in the 1st place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who conducted a study into Romanian orphans?

A

Rutter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the Romanian orphans study called?

A

ERA (English and Romanian Adoptee) study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the procedure of Rutter’s study?

A
  • 165 Romanian orphans adopted in Britain - testing to what extent good care could make up for poor early experiences in institutions.
  • Physical, cognitive and emotional development was tested at 4,6,11 and 15.
  • A group of 52 British children adopted around the same time served as a control group.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were Rutters’ findings?

A
  • When they 1st arrived - half of adoptees showed signs of delayed intellectual development and majority severely malnourished.
  • At age 11, the mean IQ of those adopted before 6 months was 107.
  • The mean IQ for those adopted between 6 months and 2 years = 86.
  • The mean IQ for those adopted after 2 years = 77.
  • Children adopted after 6 months showed signs of disinhibited attachment (clinginess, attention seeking, social behaviour directed indiscriminately towards all adults.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who conducted the Bucharest Early Intervention project?

A

Zeenah.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the procedure of the Bucharest Early Intervention project?

A
  • Assessed attachment in 95 children aged 12-31 months who had spent most of their lives in institutional care.
  • They were compared to a control group of 50 children who had never lived in an institution.
  • Attachment type was measured using the strange situation and carers were also asked about unusual social behaviour (disinhibited attachment symptoms).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Bucharest Early Intervention project find?

A
  • 74% of control group = secure.
  • 19% of institutional group = secure.
  • Description of disinhibited attachment applied to 44% of institutionalised children.
  • Applied to less than 20% of control group.
17
Q

What are the 2 effects of institutionalisation?

A

Disinhibited attachment

Mental retardation

18
Q

What is disinhibited attachment?

A
  • Equally friendly and affectionate to strangers and familiar adults.
19
Q

How did Rutter explain the reason for children developing disinhibited attachment?

A

Rutter explained disinhibited attachment as an adaptation to living with multiple carers during the sensitive period of attachment.

20
Q

What is mental retardation in terms of the effects of institutionalisation?

A
  • In Rutters study, most children showed signs of retardation when they arrived in Britain.
  • Most adopted before 6 months caught up with the control group by age 4.
  • Damage to intellectual development as a result of institutionalisation can be recovered provided adoption takes place before the age of 6 months - the age at which attachments form.
21
Q

State 2 positives of research into Romanian orphans.

A

Real life application:
- key workers
Fewer extraneous variables than other orphan studies:
- other orphan studies - children placed in care as a result of trauma (e.g. neglect, abuse etc)
- hard to observe effects of institutionalisation in isolation because the children were dealing with multiple factors which functioned as confounding participant variables
- increased internal validity of Romanian orphan studies as we can study the effect of institutionalisation without these confounding variables

22
Q

State a negative of research into Romanian orphans.

A

Romanian orphanages were not typical:

  • extremely low levels of intellectual stimulation
  • studies may lack generalisabilit
  • particularly poor standards of care
23
Q

How does an internal working model effect later relationships?

A
  • Bowlby suggested that a child having their first relationship with their primary attachment figure forms a mental representation of this relationship, which acts as a template for future relationships.
  • If the first experience was loving and with a reliable caregiver, then the child tends to assume that this is how all relationships will be.
  • They then seek out functional relationships and behave functionally within them.
  • Bad experience = may struggle to form relationships or may behave inappropriately within them.
24
Q

Which attachment type forms the best quality childhood relationships?

A

Secure

25
Q

Who conducted research into relationships on later childhood?

A

Myron-Wilson and Smith

26
Q

What did Myron-Wilson and Smith’s research find?

A
  • Assessed attachment type and bullying involvement using a standard questionnaire in 196 children in London.
  • Insecure avoidant = victims
  • Insecure resistant = bullies
27
Q

Who conducted research into relationships in adulthood with romantic partners?

A

Hazen and Shaver

28
Q

What was the procedure of Hazen and Shaver’s research?

A
  • Analysed 620 replies to a ‘love quick’ printed in an American local newspaper.
  • Quiz had 3 sections:
    1. assess respondents current or most important relationship
    2. assess general love experiences (eg number of partners)
    3. assessed attachment type
29
Q

What did Hazen and Shaver’s ‘love quiz’ find?

A
  • 56% secure
  • 25% insecure avoidant
  • 19% insecure resistant
  • secure attachment = most likely to have good and longer lasting romantic experiences
  • insecure avoidant = tended to reveal jealousy and fear of intimacy
30
Q

Who conducted research into relationships in adulthood as a parent?

A

Bailey et al.

31
Q

What did Bailey et al. find in their study?

A
  • 99 mothers and their babies.
  • Mother and baby attachment assessed using the strange situation.
  • Mother and mother attachment assessed using an interview.
  • Majority of women had the same attachment classification both to they babies and own mothers.
32
Q

How does an internal working model impact parenthood?

A

IWM affects the childs ability to parent their own children.

33
Q

State 3 negatives of research into attachment and later relationships.

A

Evidence on continuity is mixed:
- Bailey, Harlow vs Zimmerman
- Zimmerman assessed infant attachments and adolescent attachment to parents and found very little relationship between quality of infant and adolescent attachment
Most studies have issues of validity:
- questionnaires and interviews - rely on accurate recollections
- Love quiz - one newspaper, self-serving bias etc
Association doesn’t mean causality:
- environmental factors, parenting style, child’s temperament