Inequality across race and gender Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition of discrimination?

A

Discrimination is when members of a ‘minority’ group are treated differently than members of a ‘majority’ group with identical productive characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

While there is evidence of an indication of discrimination why is it not taken as conclusive? (3)

A

Unobserved factors:

  • Productivity can depends directly on f (e.g. beauty)
  • B (returns to x) could be endogenous (do we reward male productivity characteristics more than female)
  • x’s themselves could be endogenous (expectation of future discrimination reduces x’s)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which audit study looks at discrimination?

A

Bertrand and Mullainthan (2004)

-Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

which natural experiment looks at discrimination?

A

Goldin and Rouse (2000)

-orchestrating Impartiality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the results from Bertrand and Mullainthan Study? (4)

A
  1. White name received 50% more call-backs
    - Equivalent to 8 more years experience
  2. Resume quality has a greater effect for white names
    - If AA have higher skills the call-backs increase but not as much as it does for whites
  3. No evidence that AA benefit from living in whiter, more educated, post codes.
  4. Race gap relatively uniform across occupations, job requirements, employer characteristics and industries.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Advantages of Bertrand and Mullainthan Study? (2)

A

They address the two main limitation of the audit study:

  1. Use resumes instead of actual auditors so the participants cannot influence the results
  2. Plus the cost of sending out resumes is far lower so they can collect more observations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Limitations of Bertrand and Mullainthan Study? (7)

A
  1. We are interested in actual job offers and wages, not just call backs.
  2. Race is not directly reported and is inferred from the name.
  3. Use very distinct names which may not represent the average applicant.
  4. data is only from 2 of the large metropolitan cities.
  5. limited occupation categories
  6. No information on who else applied
  7. No information on the employers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the research design of ‘Are emily and greg more employable then Lakisha and Jamal?

A

Send fictitious resumes with randomly designed AA or white sounding names to job ads in Chicago and bostan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How many employment adds did the Bertrand and Mullainthan Study reply too?

A

1300

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the research design of the Goldin and Rouse (2000) study?

A

The study attempts to isolate the importance of gender preference in a market setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What method does the Goldin and Rouse (2000) study take?

A

difference-in-differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What data did the Goldin and Rouse (2000) study use?

A
  • Collected data from 8 major symphony orchestras
  • Dating from 1950s to 1995
  • Sample of auditions consists of 14, 121 person-rounds, 7,065 individuals and 588 audition-rounds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the findings of the Goldin and Rouse (2000) study? (2)

A
  1. Blind auditions during the preliminary rounds increased the likelihood that a female musician would advance to the next round by 11 percentage points
  2. In the final round, blind auditions increased the likelihood of female musicians being selected by 30%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cautions of the Goldin and Rouse (2000) findings? (2)

A
  1. Women who choose to audition for orchestras using blind auditions could be substantially different from those who choose to take part in non-blind.
  2. Performers might perform different with/without blind screens.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the four models for discrimination? (4)

A
  1. taste for discrimination
  2. Statistical discrimination
  3. Overcrowding model
  4. Institutional model
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe taste for discrimination?

A

When people act as if there is a non-pecuniary cost of associating with a particular group.

The source can be employer, employee or customer

17
Q

Describe statistical dsicrimination

A

Employment decisions are based not on individual productive characteristics but (perceived or accurate) group differences

18
Q

Describe the overcrowding model of discrimination

A

In the overcrowding model, minority groups crowd int o lower wage jobs either due to preference or lack of alternative opportunity

19
Q

Describe the institutional model for discrimination

A

Everyday operation of firms (which are controlled by majority groups) cause differences in productivity, promotion opportunities and pay.

20
Q

Which theoretical model for discrimination underpins the Bertrand and Mullainthan Study?

A

Employers located in areas which a higher % of black residents discriminate less, so there is some evidence of employer taste based discrimination

21
Q

Which theoretical model of discrimination underpins the Orchestrating Impartiality study?

A

We can NOT tell whether the evidence present is for taste based or statistical discrimination