Industry and agriculture in the Stalin era Flashcards
what was one of the central aims of the communist regime and how would 5 year plans help reach it?
as one of the central aims of the communist regime was to industrialise the country, 5 year plans were designed to get away from the NEP (as had capitalist elements/ unintentional consequences of NEPmen), bring rapid industrial growth to modernise economy and move towards socialism.
when and where was the decision to move away from NEP and towards industrialisation made?
fifteenth party congress in 1927
who was in charge of Industrialisation
Gosplan
When was the first five year plan ?
1928-32
what was the aim of 5 year plans in general?
to emphasise heavy industry and achieve self sufficiency in the USSR
what was the focus of the 1st 5 year plan
it concentrated on rapid growth in heavy industry
consumer goods e.g household goods were neglected, which was justified as a need to build up industrial infrastructure of factories/plants etc. before other sectors could flourish
what was the focus of the 2nd 5 year plan
1933-37
initially set high targets for consumer goods, but as Hitler was rising to power this was redirected to focus in heavy industry in the need of defence
what was the focus of the 3rd 5 year plan?
launched in 1938
directly focused on arms production to meet threat of Germany.
what were the successes of the first 5 year plan?
industrial expansion mainly due to more efficient use of existing factories and equipment
new plants were built
industrial centres built from scratch like Magnitogorsk, 1929 only 25 people lived their 3 years later 250,000 residents.
propaganda success, model workers like Stakhanov were rewarded with a new flat and bigger rations
government used slave labour (labour camp prisoners) to mine economic resources in harsh conditions
what were the failures of the first 5 year plan
workers lived in tents and huts in industrial centres
material reward was limited but work was hard
workers only motivated buy revolutionary attitudes
by 1933 only 17% of workforce was skilled in Moscow
white sea canal killed 10,000 prisoners during a winter, while propaganda success, canal was useless only to small barges as depth was reduced to save money
factory manager received unrealistic target, and were forced to bribe and steal due to fear
quantity over quality e.g. Stalingrad factory meant to produce 500 tractors a month in 1930, they only achieved 8 by June and most broke down
what were the success of the second and third 5 year plans?
made more use of technical expertise, new industrial centres rose coal production substantially
chemical industry made progress
regionally developed USSR e.g. built industrial centres in Kazakhstan also protected industry from invasion
engineering industry and transportation industry grew
1928-41 saw a growth rate of 17%
4x increase in coal production
footwear and and food processing output increased (new bakeries, ice cream factories in many towns)
what were the faliures of the second and third 5 year plans?
oil industry remained disappointing
growth was imbalanced
less success in production of metal
consumer industry still suffered, production of textiles declined, housing ignored
planners were disorganised, lots of wasted materials + mangers and technical experts were purged in 1937 slowing down the economy
what was the conclusion of Stalin’s five year plans?
able to defend itself from Nazi invasion in 1941-45
Soviet union made enormous economic growth, but was unbalanced
some sectors declined while others grew
lots of human cost, 10,000 died in white sea canal
health and safety of workers was terrible
what policy did Stalin implement to ‘fix’ agriculture?
collectivisation which was state ownership which mechanised and combined small farms into large units
what were the 3 reasons for Stalin introducing collectivisation?
link with industry;
Threat of invasion meant modern economic society was essential to defend USSR for invasion and industry was only able to be developed by increase in agricultural productivity, to feed workers, export food for tech.
economic case;
small farms were inefficient compared to rest of Europe, larger units equates to economies of scale e.g. machinery more cost effective which would improve food production and therefore require less labour so more workers could work in industry
political case;
would help extend socialism to countryside to help revolution survive, get rid of kulaks and gain greater control over countryside as they lowered food production as they knew the state would take it. Stalin saw that forced policy of collectivisation would increase food production