Individualism vs Collectivisim Flashcards
What should be the introduction to Individualism vs Collectivism
- This essay will argue that the government should be involved and responsible for tackling social inequalities.
- It will discuss both collectivist and individualistic views.
What is the first collectivist argument?
- The government are best suited to tackling and reducing social inequalities.
Why should the government tackle these inequalities?
- The causes of these inequalities are quite often very complex meaning that it would be too much for one organisation such as a charity to handle on its own.
- This means only the government has the resources needed to fix this problem.
What is poverty caused by, and what is the subfactors?
- Poverty is very often caused by factors beyond someone’s control e.g. being made redundant from foreign competition, periods of recession in the country or the decline of manufacturing.
What is the example for this first collectivist argument?
- For example, in February 2020 Lloyds Banking Group announced the closure of 56 branches in Scotland, which made 780 redundancies.
What is the analysis point for the first collectivist argument?
- Collectivists would argue that the government should be responsible for providing unemployment benefits to keep people stable.
- This would prevent homelessness for the unemployed, + for these people to look for another job in the meantime, so they do not fall into the poverty cycle.
What is the second explain point for collectivism?
- The government are the only people who have the resources needed, and the influence and knowledge to be able to address and fix these complex factors.
What is the second example point for collectivism?
- In March 2020, the UK Government introduced the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, which was estimated to cost around £14 billion per month, and it prevented 9 million people from losing their jobs during the coronavirus pandemic.
What is the additional explanation to the second example point? (covid)
- It enabled companies to put workers on furlough instead of making them redundant if the company could no longer pay the worker.
- The Government would pay 80% of their wage and the company would pay 20%, helping both the company and the worker in question.
What is the analysis for the second collecitivst point?
- This shows that the Government has previously used resources to help people from becoming unemployed.
- Proving the previously made point that only the government has the resources to be able to reduce social inequalities
- and is beyond the capabilities of the private and charitable sectors.
What is the overall conclusion for both collectivist points?
- Overall, the government are the only people who can make changes to social inequalities.
- There are complicated factors as to why people in poverty, not that poverty was your own fault which individualists argue.
- Therefore, the government should make up the difference.
- They have been able to do this in the past with the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, they should be able to do it now for people who are living on the breadline.
What is the final collectivist argument?
- Social inequalities have deepened when governments put in place individualistic policies.
What is individualism for the collectivist argment?
- Individualism is an ideology which assumes that most of the disadvantages that someone has in their life such as unemployment or being in poverty are their own fault.
- They believe if someone does not have the means to support themselves in life, then that is because they did not work hard enough to get the skills, they needed to benefit them later in their lives.
Do Governments follow individualistic policies and what will they do?
- A lot of Governments that do follow this ideology believe in personal achievement, and will put up fewer benefits, or even remove them together
What is the example for the final collectivist point?
- For example, the Conservative Government 2012 introduced widespread reforms to the benefits system
- This was officially called the Welfare Reform Act of 2012.
- It replaced existing benefits with a new system called “Universal Credit” and introduced caps on the total of benefits which could be potentially claimed.
What do collectivists argue about how the Welfare Reform Act of 2012 can do to social inequalities?
- However, collectivists argue that such action has the potential to increase social inequalities.
Has foodbank use increased recently?
- Since the changes to the benefits system, foodbank use has increased significantly.