Indirect Effect Flashcards
Article 4(3)
Loyal co-operation
Pfieffer
National law must be interpreted in conformity with community law, inherent in the treaty.
Von Colson
National courts are required to interpret the national law in the light of the wording and purpose of the directive in order to achieve the result of Art 288.
Duke v Reliance Systems
ECA did not oblige an English Court to distort the meaning of a British Statute in order to enforce against an individual a directive that had no direct effect between individuals.
Pickstone v Freemans Plc
HoL construed Equal Pay (amendment) Regulations in a way that gave effect to the declared intention of the UK gov consistent with treaty provisions.
Lister v Forth Dry Dock
HoL held that the UK courts were under a duty to follow the practice of ECJ by giving a purposive construction to regulations issued for the purpose of complying with directives.
Finnegan v Clowney Youth Training Programme
Even though sex discrimination order had been enacted subsequent to a directive, the order should be construed in the same manner. Parliament must have intended them to have the same effect.
Marleasing
Whether the provisions were adopted before or after the directive, the national court called upon to interpret it is required to do so as far as possible in light of the wording of the directive.
Webb v EMO Air Cargo
Must interpret domestic law with terms of a directive in the same field “only if it is possible to do so”
Wagner Miret
MS must presume the state intended to comply with EU law.
Francovich
MS is obliged to “make good the loss and damage sustained” as a result of their failure to implement the Directive in their respect.
Criminal proceedings against Kolphinghuis Nimigen
A directive cannot have the effect of determining/aggravating the liability in criminal law of persons who act in contravention of the provisions of that directive.
Criminal proceedings against Arcaro
Obligation to refer to a directive limits where such an interpretation leads to the imposition of an individual of an obligation laid down by a directive.
Centrosteel
National court is bound when applying provisions of domestic law predating the directive, to interpret those provisions in light of that directive.
Brunhoffer
Equal pay directive merely clarifies Art 157 and therefore the primary EU law is the true source of the rights.