India- Unit 2.4 Flashcards

1
Q

L1=Impact of the Second World War on Politics:

What events took place?

A
  • 1942:
  • The Cripps Mission
  • The Quit India Campaign

1943:

  • Wavell becomes viceroy
  • The Bengal Famine (1943-44)

1945:
-The Simla Conference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the impact of the SWW on India?

A
  • Japanese invasions (working with Nazi Germany)
  • British keen to secure a settlement with Indian people to maintain their full support in war effort
  • viceroy Linlithgow confessed that if there was a land-borne invasion, India would be unable to do anything apart from scorched earth policy
  • axis forces (aided by Bose) closer to invading subcontinent. By 1942, they were already attacking Indian ports, ships and aircraft
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Where can find summaries of these events?

A

1) Booklet
2) Cavell summary (not yet uploaded)
3) Recap PowerPoints in GoodNotes

👀

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who was Cripps and how did he come to be appointed?

A
  • Labour Party minister
  • optimistic
  • friend of Nehru and Gandhi and sympathetic to Indian aspirations
  • Winston Churchill (prime minister) appointed him to lead a delegation to India to secure full Indian co-operation and support for war effort (bowed under-pressure for some sort of self-determination)
  • interesting that it is a conservative prime minister appointing a labour figure (perhaps suggesting were not serious about making changes otherwise would have sent someone in own party).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Cripps offer on behalf of the British government?

A
  • Mission held in New Delhi (23rd March) 1942
  • dominion status similar to other dominions of empire
  • allegiance to crown 👑 but not subordinate in domestic or external affairs 🌍
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the successes and failures of the Cripps’ Mission?

A

✅all Indian parties could join an interim government of national unity under viceroy and council- operate until end of the war
❌Dominion status- never change position and British ultimately keep control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did congress and the Muslim league differ in their responses to Cripp’s proposals?

A
  • Gandhi- curios, rejected first part of the bargain-not willing to accept situation where states were allowed to opt out of a United India
  • ML- ready to accept Cripps bargain- said separate state would not be a problem but rejected too had to remain part of constitutional making process
  • Churchill and Linlithgow- did not affect congress demands- had to remain in control- showed would cling onto India at all costs and would end be accept as equal partners

Ended without any conclusions, Cripps went home empty handed 😟

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Quit India Campaign-How did the British respond to failure of the Cripps Mission?

A
  • both sides hardened their approaches to constitutional change
  • Linlithgow stepped up press censorship and intercepts by special Branch of congress communications and planned to arrest all the congress leaders and deport them to Uganda, Gandhi being sent to Aden (fell through, governor of Aden objected to presence of Gandhi in Aden), arrest warrants would expire (lapse)
  • Indicative of the level of panic felt in Whitehall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What differences in opinion did congress have? How was the campaign set up?

A
  • Gandhi= pressuring congress to support a new Satyagraha, argued since Japan’s aggression was aimed at Britain- if India would go free they could make peace with Japan. Wanted idyllic rural lifestyle cut off from world, believed Indians should be left to God if not anarchy
  • Nehru= disagreed with a Gandhi- refused to support fascism
  • to commit a Satyagraha at a critical time for Britain- struggle with Nazi Germany and Axis Powers-some thought seemed like treachery and would set Raj against Congress making any reconciliation after the war difficult
  • to remain quiescent (inert/ passive) would give an upper hand to Jinnah or Bose
  • so decided to launch campaign
  • ‘Quit India’ became public outcry in U.K and troops trying to defend frontiers against Japan
  • knowing Raj would enforce repression, congress leaders before imprisonment called on their supporters to make India ungovernable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the successes and failures of the Quit India Campaign for Congress?

A

✅Gandhi anticipated Raj’s response- made demonstrators become own leaders-intuitive and forward thinking
❌Aims not met, death and went directly against Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence- people used pass to release frustration
❌9th August, Gandhi, Nehru and most of congress leaders were arrested and interned. Next 2 weeks, thousands of local activists were rounded up and imprisoned
❌offices were raided, files taken and funds frozen
❌Became out of control with no leaders, lost focus

❌Raj had time to prepare contingency plans due to congress’ indecision over the campaign
❌Riots, killings and murders of Europeans
❌damage and destruction of government property eg: revenue offices, police stations, signal boxes, telephone and telegraph lines pulled down (especially bad in a time of war)
❌Over a thousand deaths and over 3000 serious injuries directly attributed to the campaign
❌Failed to paralyse government (even in militant Hindu areas eg: Bihar)
❌Military remained loyal to the Raj in regiments only 216 soldiers gone absent without leave
❌Had not attracted support throughout India in terms of geography, religion, caste
❌Non-cooperation brought detention, despair and death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What actions did Wavell take when he became Viceroy of India?

A
  • October 1943
  • reinstated regular meetings of the 11 governors of the provinces of British India (Linlithgow never did them)
  • enabled the Government of India to present with the British government with coherent advice and a unified point of view (more difficult for the British government to dismiss the views of provincial governors out of hand)
  • disaster in Bengal tested Wavell’s leadership of the Raj
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why was Wavell chosen? Why did Churchill choose him?

A
  • successful in Middle East 1940
  • Churchill choice-chose a military man and one he thought could control from Whitehall (not the case)
  • lack of understanding with political and negotiating skills
  • wring person in wrong place at wring time
  • unfamiliar ground of India
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How did Wavell help the Indian cause?

A

-started time in office by touring the subcontinent, travelled as far as 1,500km a week, focused on troubled areas eg: Punjab, Bengal and United Province- tried to allay fears, settle dispute and boost morale- involved, proactive and interested

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happened during the Bengal Famine?

A

-causes by multiple factors such as poor harvests,distribution failures, loss of imports, wartime price inflation, severe weather conditions

  • crop yield in 1943 was the worst that century
  • recorded annual death rate rose above the average of 1.2 million to 1.9 million
  • dying from disease- smallpox, malaria, cholera and pneumonia- malnutrition
  • crowded into Calcutta in hope to find relief- begging and dying in the streets
  • made worse- rich hoarded fearing an invasion from a Japan
  • famine became a recruiting agent for the INA
  • by 1943 the price of rice had risen tenfold
  • Roosevelt (US President) also refused when asked to lend American ships to bring in wheat from a Australia also afraid of damaging own war effort
  • estimated 1-3 million people died in the 3 years of the Bengal Famine
  • whole villages were wiped out
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How did the British government respond to the famine?

A
  • wavell tried to co-ordinate rationing to try and stop profiteering, diverging troops from the war effort
  • Wavell was in a battle with Whitehall trying to get more grain for India
  • Churchill focuses on war effort and his advisor Lord Cherwell (paymaster general) told him the BF was a statistical invention
  • Wavell’s request for a guaranteed million tons of grain throughout 194f was met with an offer of 250,000 tons and a request for more Indian rice
  • June 1944- wavell had extracted 450,000 tons of grain from a reluctant government
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did congress and the Muslim league respond to the famine?

A

Jinnah= accused British government of incompetence and irresponsibility, pointed out wouldn’t stand did it if it happened in London- dying on streets of Calcutta

  • congress= blamed the crises on the diversion of foodstuffs to British troops
  • both ML + C made political capital out of the crisis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The Simla Conference:

-why were Britain now prepared to agree on settlement?

A

1) Britain was millions of pounds in debt to India for goods and services borrowed to help win the war
2) Terrorist activity and unrest in India- convinced Wavell and Secretary of State Amery another constitutional settlement had to be made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What major change did Wavell propose?

A
  • proposal loosely modelled on that of Sir Stafford Cripps, difference- composition of Executive Council- similar to cabinet, Raj- ICS= highest leader of province- starting to expand
  • radical action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Why was the conference adjourned?

A
  • conference reached a deadlock on the issue of how Muslim members of the newly reconstituted Executive Council would be chosen
  • adjourned 14th July- unable to break the deadlock between Congress and the Muslim League
  • offer reversed- anti-climax
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Summary of SIMLA CONFERENCE (2ND):

A
  • 1945 (spring)
  • travelled to London for meeting with British coalition
  • wavell government and British cabinet was ready at a fresh attempt at an Indian settlement
  • wavell returned to Delhi with a new scheme= executive council
  • chosen did balanced representation of the main communities, equal proportions of Muslims and Hindus
  • all members would be Indian (exception of viceroy and commander in chief-essential as long as defence of India remained a British responsibility)
  • congress was unlikely to be happy= Muslims would inflate the importance of the Muslim constituency in India
  • conference of Indian political leaders travelled to Simla eg: Gandhi, Jinnah, Nehru, Azad, Muslim President of congress (sneered by Jinnah-nothing but a token Muslim)
  • deadlock on how executive council would be chosen
  • Jinnah= all be nominated by the Muslim league
  • congress= not except (⬆️) restriction, inclusive party
  • Muslims should represent congress as well as Muslim league
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Similarities and differences between the First World War and Second World War:

A

🌜Similarities:

  • huge military and economic contributions + on Homefront
  • repression:
  • Rowlatt and Amritsar
  • Quit India= Linlithgow arresting congress leaders + wanting deportation to Uganda
  • both acted as a catalyst for independence groups to take action
  • British government attempted to agree on settlements eg: Montagu Declaration and Cripps/ Simla (but abandon/ no timescales etc)
  • British introduced censorship eg: Rowlatt and response to Cripps
  • decisions in India were controversial in Britain eg: Governmental of India Act 1919 and Bengal Famine
  • viceroy committed to reform eg: Chelmsford and Wavell
  • poor British response to a key event leads to frustrations eg: Amritsar and Bengal Famine

🌛Differences:
-more legislation made after first- Britain in control and made decisions without inclusion of India. In SWW tried to include them but unlike 1st decisions not made- internal division in India= Simla conference

-Indian leaders more outspoken and action- Quit India Campaign

  • In SWW, the Indians themselves opponents/ hinderance not present after FWW
  • after the SWW, the British are more willing to compromise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Impact of SWW: (RECAP):

A

🍂During the SWW, there was a threat of invasion

  • axis forced (aided by Bose) were getting closer invaded the Indian subcontinent. By 1942, there were already attacking Indian ports, ships and aircraft
  • viceroy Linlithgow confessed that if there was a land borne invasion, India would be unable to do anything apart from a scorched earth policy
  • the British were therefore keen to secure a settlement with the Indian people to maintain their full support in the war effort
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Article notes- “Has India’s contribution to the Second World War been ignored?”

A
  • still used to provide for allies eg: cotton, explosives…
  • more than 2 million Indian soldiers participated
  • 89,000 died in military service
  • 2.3 million soldiers manned Indian army
  • 3 million Bengalis killed by famine
  • more than half a million South Asian refugees fled Myanmar
  • 14th Army= multinational force of British, Indian and African units
  • 30 Indians won Victorian crosses in 1940s
  • all volunteers, not conscripted
  • non-combatants- cooks, mechanics, tailors…
  • saw as a job- earning money to eat not seen as heroism
  • dangerous low skilled jobs eg: some died in industrial accidents- eg: explosion in Bombay Harbour in 1944, 80,000 made homeless
  • some elite south Asians made profit from war and transformed their fortunes
  • most Anglo-Indians
  • partition of 1947- carving up of country
  • women mined for coal in Bihar and Central India
  • recaptured Burma for Allies
  • Helpful in fight
  • loaded cargo and died from disease
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Impact of the war on Congress, Muslim league, Forward Bloc (reactions):

1)CONGRESS:

A
  • felt sympathetic to Britain and their right against fascism. Urged the British government to negotiate with Hitler, using peaceful means
  • ordered all members to resign from provincial ministries (this was not a sensible idea- actually meant that provinces returned to direct British government)
  • denounced the idea of partition as a mad scheme. Toured India trying to strengthen their own position
  • Withdrew their ministers from provinces where it had the majority in order to show their dislike for India in the war. This also showed their determination to free India from foreign domination
  • shocked and horrified- the Government of India Act was supposed to be some sort of power- sharing and now the British were enforcing decisions
  • not prepared to commit themselves openly to a government that had not consulted them prior to the declaration of war, not were they prepared to fight unless they were granted immediate Swaraj
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

2)MUSLIM LEAGUE:

A
  • saw the political upheaval as an opportunity; called for celebrations and prayers of thanksgiving
  • discussions begun over the creation of a separate state- Pakistan. Favoured partition
  • in May 1940, accepted an invitation from Lord Linlithgow to discuss issues relating to war. Agreed that the government would not adopt any new constitution without the prior approval of this group
  • worked with the Raj and the British government to support the war effort so to strengthen their own position in India
  • saw the loss of congress ministries as an opportunity. Initially expressed a desire to work with Nehru
  • called a meeting in Lahore in 1940. Discussed 2 main principles for any new constitution:
    1) Minorities had to be protected
    2) Separate independent states should be formed for Muslims in those areas of the country where they had the majority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

3)FORWARD BLOC:

A
  • a terrorist organisation aimed at getting the British to quit India. Published their first newspaper in the month that war was declared
  • urged military action against the British. This resulted in an arrest of the leader for treason but he escaped and went into exile.
  • tried to convince Stalin to support the Indian Independence struggle. This failed so they went to Germany instead. The Nazis encouraged the publication of anti-British propaganda urging Indians to rise up against British tyranny
  • in Japan, formed the Indian National Army (INA) from Indian prisoners of war. Planned a full-scale land invasion of India. In 1944 6000 soldiers of the INA invaded India- 600 of these deserted to the British, 400 were killed, 1,500 died from desentry and malaria. The rest surrendered.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

CONCLUSIONS:

-Campaign for Independence in 1930-42:

A
  • congress was showing that it still had control over Indians
  • congress campaigning to end Raj
  • Muslim league was greatly strengthening
  • the Raj had shown they could still hold India by force and that they still had some popularity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

RESOURCES TO LOOK OVER 👀!!

A

1) Article- “How Churchill ‘starved’ India”

2) Factfile- Wavell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Give some key statistics (from article) of how Churchill ‘starved’ India:

A
  • exported more than 70,000 tonnes of rice between January and July 1943 for consumption in Britain which would have kept 40,000 Indian people alive for a full year
  • In the Autumn of 1943- UK’s food and raw material stockpile for its 47 million people (14 million fewer than that of Bengal) swelled 18.5 million tonnes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

How did the events in Britain and America influence the situation in India in 1930s/40s?

1)Britain:

A
  • Depression
  • Abdication crisis
  • Jarrow and Hunger marches
  • Second World War and re-armament
  • welfare state-Beveridge report and NHS
  • Ireland becoming Independent
  • Empires in general collapsing- Palestinian partition and dominions
  • National government
  • competition from other countries
  • currency and gold standard
  • loans to USA
  • labour government
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

2)America:

A
  • The Great Depression
  • Second World War and rearmament
  • Roosevelt and New Deal
  • Threat of communism
  • Anti-Empire
  • Pearl Habour-Japan
  • seen as the peacemakers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

-Who was responsible for the failure in negotiations between 1942-45? (Own opinion-notes)

A

Look in notes- own opinion so just look- useful in forming conclusions! 👀

33
Q

Explain the effect of each of these events in Britain and their affect on Indian Politics:

A

1) As a consequence of the Depression, British investments in India had fallen in the 1930s.
Capitalists and entrepreneurs in India were taking the lead in investing in their own country.
This impacted on Indian politics because…..Led to an increase in middle classes etc.

2) Due to international competition, fewer British goods were being sent to India. In 8 years, the amount
Indians spent on imported goods had declined from £86 million to £39 million per annum. This was
because of competition from Japanese and American manufacturers.
This impacted on Indian politics because…..there was an export crisis for the British (which they hated)
and at the same time the Indian economy, controlled by Indians, was becoming more buoyant.

3) In 1931, the Reserve Bank of India was established by the British. This meant that India was given
permission to set the value of its own currency.
This impacted on Indian politics because…..The rupee was no longer tied to British sterling. Led to a
sense of economic independence. Indian based-enterprises and initiatives which, in turn, could engender
national pride.

4) In 1936, King Edward VIII abdicated.
This impacted on Indian politics because…..British gov were pre-occupied.

5) In 1939, as part of the re-armament strategy, the British government agreed to pay for the Indian army
to be modernised.
This impacted on Indian politics because…..Helped the Allied war programme BUT also have the Indian
army a sense of competence and self-worth – these are essential ingredients of nationalism.

6) By 1945, Britain was facing the economic consequences of the Second World War. Most of the costs of
the Indian army had been paid by the British government. Britain owed £2730 million to the USA. On
top of this, an enormous amount of reconstruction had to be undertaken.
This impacted on Indian politics because…..How realistic was it financially to maintain control of India,
particularly given the strength of the nationalist movements?

7) In the 1940s, the welfare state was beginning to be set up.
This impacted on Indian politics because….. How realistic was it financially to maintain control of India,
particularly given the strength of the nationalist movements?

34
Q

Affect of these events in AMERICA on Indian politics:

A

1) Before the USA entered the Second World War,
they were seen by the world as the
peacemakers. They had pledged self-
determination for all once war was over.
This impacted on Indian politics because…..the
Indians felt spurred on by this “support” from
America. FDR put pressure on Britain to act (no
different to Nazi Germany empire). He wanted
immediate action (like Attlee not Churchill).

2) However, in 1941, after events in Pearl
Harbour, the USA entered the war. They fought
the Japanese relentlessly.
This impacted on Indian politics because…..They
were pre-occupied with the SWW – money,
resources etc BUT also maybe willing to support
the Indians against the threat of land invasion
from the Japanese.

35
Q

How successful were the labour government in finding a political solution?

-what was the impact of the new labour government, what were the key events?

A
  • 26th July 1945 general election
  • labour party gained 393 seats vs conservative 213
  • Clement Attlee Prime Minister
  • The New India Committee
  • The Labour-Congress Axis
  • Indian Elections 1946
  • The Cabinet Mission
  • The Simla Conference
  • The May Statement
36
Q

What was the New India Committee?

A
  • Attlee set up
  • Included Cripps (now chancellor of the Exchequer) and Wilkinson (now Education Secretary) as well as viscounts and earls
  • tasked with changing and implementing
  • team had enthusiasm but lacking in experience
37
Q

What was the Labour-Congress Axis?

A
  • congress and the Labour Party had formed special friendships/ alliances throughout the 20th Century eg: Cripps and Nehru
  • Krishna Menon was a London based Indian-Socialist why strengthened labour- congress links
  • created difficulties- was labour anti-British
38
Q

(Remember more detailed notes in folder but summary….)

-What was the impact of the Indian elections 1946?

A

♟February 1946 – Elections for the 11 provinces & the Central Assembly (to be based in New
Delhi)

♟These elections were recommended by Cripps in the New All-India Committee. Note – the
Central Assembly was not the Executive Council promised by Wavell.

♟The outcome of the election paved the way for future decisions – Congress had dominated
the overall voting figures but the Muslim League was popular with Muslim voters. This implied support for a separate Muslim state.

39
Q

What was the Cabinet Mission?

A

🦥March 1946 - Attlee sent 3 men to try to solve India’s constitutional problems

🦥The Mission were asked to do everything possible to maintain a united India and to make the transfer of power speedy

🦥Successful discussions with Congress; limited opposition from the ML

🦥The Sikhs were ignored in any decision making

40
Q

What was the Simla Conference?

A

🌴May 1946 – A Conference was held. Aim was to discuss the new Constitution.

🌴The main Constitution was based on a united India (Partition was not acceptable). There
would be an All-India Union & then three clusters of provincial governments (Hindu, Muslim
and joint). H/e it also proposed that in time, provincial govs could hold a plebiscite and
decide to create a separate state. They hoped that Congress would accept this plan.

🌴However, there was a ‘back up’ to the Constitution which said that there would be two
separate states created (Hindustan & Pakistan). They knew the ML would prefer this plan
but hoped they would settle for the first because of the ‘separate state’ clause.

🌴Congress didn’t agree to either plan.

41
Q

What was the May Statement?

A

🌸May 1946 – The Cabinet Mission announced that they would make the decisions.

🌸They planned for a Constituent Assembly (made up of the British leaders from the 11
provinces) to draft the Constitution.

🌸In the meantime, they nominated an interim government in India (finally similar to Wavell’s
Executive Council). There were the same disagreements previously from Congress & ML
about how the members of this would be selected. The Viceroy was therefore given powers
to choose members.

🌸Congress tried to negotiate with the British by part-accepting the Simla Conference
Constitution. The British did not accept this – but they did not rule it out either.

42
Q

How far did they reach a compromise?

A
  • failed to listen to response of Indian election
  • lack of progress in Indian position
  • failed to unite congress and Muslim league
  • ML getting frustrated and end up responding with terrorism and violence
  • Britain look weak- still no clearer and contradictions eg: idea of a plan B in Simla Conference
  • Britain favouring congress creating issues, ML and Sikhs less included- starting to feel discriminatory

But…

  • did act quickly, did as much as conservative government in a couple of months
  • were trying to negotiate but stubbornness of congress and Muslim league
43
Q

🦩Jinnah, Nehru and Interim Government:

  • Direct Action:
    1) What did Jinnah do in the summer of 1946 and why?
A
  • saw duplicity of congress and the Raj
  • convened a council of the league in Bombay (27th July)
  • rejected all agreements made with the Cabinet Mission
  • 2 days later called for a universal Muslim Hartal-urged Muslims to prepare for day of Direct Action (16th August)
44
Q

Why did viceroy wavell choose not to respond?

A
  • had provincial governors to worry about-congress controlled 3/4 of India
  • Police loyalty would be swayed towards those who would inherit power and control (turn towards the nationalists)
  • commander in Chief Auchinleck made discreet enquiries among Indian officers- loyal to own concept of India and warned Wavell it was unlikely Hindus or Muslim would turn on their own (Hindu v Hindu, Muslim v Muslim)
45
Q

What happened in Calcutta?

A
  • Jinnah took Indian Muslims into horror and bloodletting of Civil War
  • Calcutta:
  • ML ordered police to take a special holiday and streets were given over to the mob
  • In 72 hours, 5000 dead, 20,000 seriously injured, 10,000 residents made homeless
  • Muslims and Hindus murdered each other in an orgy of killings and bloodletting, looting and arson- spread across India
46
Q

What were the consequences of Direct Action for Jinnah, Wavell and Congress?

A

Wavell:
-called for removal, did not support Gandhi or Jinnah
-appeal to halt the killings ignored
-Irritated by Gandhi:
🩸 Regarded him as a malevolent manipulator- appealed by Gandhi’s remark that if India wanted a blood bath, she could have it
-felt undermined by congress and labour government- Jinnah having urged Direct Action yet still lost position as viceroy

Jinnah:
-Saw the direct violence and partition as inevitable
-assured Wavell that Pakistan was worth the sacrifice of ten million Muslims
-shows himself to be either a leader who could…
🩸Not control the Muslim league
🩸Naive in un leading disorder

Congress:

  • did not oppose direct action, secret negotiations with Britain
  • numerical strength
  • worked in secret negotiations between Gandhi and Congress’ representative in London to have private conversations with Attlee
  • eg: congress pressed for the removal of wavell which Attlee agreed to
47
Q

What was the outcome?

A
  • trust between differing communities lost and any potential for a compromise between leaders
  • possibility for partition stronger and more likely (already divided even if not geographical- not a United India)
48
Q

2) INTERIM GOVERNMENT

- What was the interim government?

A

-emergency/ transitional government- set up to manage a political transition in case generally of a new nation or following collapse of previous governing administration

  • sworn-2nd September 1946- Nehru as Prime Minister
  • viceroy still partly responsible for governance of India but had to carry out decisions of Indian ministers and Executive Council- meant carrying out wishes of congress
  • Nehru= foreign affairs
  • Sardar Patel (Congress’ general Secretary)- home affairs- sidelined viceroy as intelligence reports sent to congress administration
  • congress running India
  • viceroy still in control but congress practically ruled
49
Q

-How did Jinnah eventually come to be involved in the interim government?

A
  • wavell persuaded
  • refused to join Executive Council (Nehru’s presence), sent Liaquat Ali Khan in place of him
  • Hoped to get Muslim League more power
  • League= responsible for home affairs (instead of Patel)- rejected, congress threatened to bring whole interim government down
  • Jinnah contented with post of finance minister
50
Q

What was the evacuation plan?

A
  • concern India was on brink of Civil War
  • Wavell weaned Secretary of State could not contain situation by force
  • All British Civilians and their families would be more to protected safe zones near coast and would be evacuated from Calcutta and Karachi
  • commander- in chief-Aunchinleck would withdraw troops in an orderly manner
  • Attlee refuses plan and considered replacement viceroy
51
Q

What happened to Viceroy Wavell and what was promised by Feb 1947?

A
  • 1946- Constituent Assembly met- never to complete task
  • wavell= worn out and he himself felt could no longer cope with strains in 1947-closer to independence
  • believed needed man with fresh ideas and was removed from post of 31st Jan 1947 and offered earldom for services to Raj
  • Admiral Viscount Louis Mountbatten of Burma- last and most controversial viceroy
  • Feb 1947- Attlee announced to House of Commons and His Majesty’s government to transfer power to Indian hands in later than 30th June 1948 (first time an official time scale/ date)
  • In responsible hands eg: an Indian government capable of maintaining peace- how?
52
Q

SOURCE NOTES:

A

-throughout made summaries of sources in textbook- different views and ideas- look as part of revision 👀!!

53
Q

Overall, why in the years 1945-46 did attempts at a political situation fail?

A
  • British pride-stubborn and unwilling, want to leave a united India legacy
  • polarisation between Congress and Muslim league
  • prejudice and allying/ favouring congress
  • wavell- viceroy- took very extreme measures/ plans eg: evacuation plan- need fresh viceroy with new ideas and approach?
54
Q

Lesson-Lord Louis Mountbatten of Burma

-Who was he? Name some key facts!

A

CREATED A FACT FILE FOR HIM-LOOK 👀!!

  • Born=1900
  • died-1979 (assassinated by IRA)
  • Viceroy of India 1947
  • known for charm and flattery
  • lady Mountbatten had an infatuation with Nehru
  • Great Grandson of Queen Victoria
  • saw becoming viceroy as a disruption to his naval career
  • Attlee describes Mountbatten as a ‘Ruritarain figure’- genre of literature- imaginary- ruling class always white upper class- dreamy lifestyle and aspirations (meant as a complicated but negative now)
55
Q

What was Mountbatten’s relationship like with congress?

A
  • cordial relations with Gandhi, Nehru and other congress leaders
  • Lady Mountbatten had infatuation with widower Nehru- favouritism
56
Q

What was mountbatten’s relationship like with Muslim league?

A
  • frosty relationship with Jinnah, later referred to him in pejorative (derogatory) terms, Jinnah saw him as pro-congress and accused hum of being anti-Muslim league
  • according to daughter Mountbatten saw Jinnah as a ‘fastidious man’ respectable in style and education but found working with him harder than first expected- had been optimistic
  • wife- lady Mountbatten- “fanatical on their Pakistan and quite impractical”
  • ‘he could not crack Jinnah’ and a lot of mistrust between them
  • did not fall for charm offensive
57
Q

What was Mountbatten’s plan for India?

A

On 3rd June 1947 announced plan:

1) Divide India but retain unity:
- country partition + Punjab and Bengal- meet congress and league’s demands (as small as possible- Congress, actual partition-league)
- rules out independence for princes
- Mountbatten favoured Congress

2) Early transfer of power on basis of Dominion status and 2 successor states- India and Pakistan:
- Britain= kept India in commonwealth + greater value of trade and investment

3)Early transfer secured congress agreement to dominion status and escape responsibility of deteriorating communal situation

4) Referendum to be held in NWEP- wether people in area wanted to join India or not
- princely states-option of joining dominions or remain independent
- provinces- Assam, Punjab, Bengal to be divided
- Boundary Commission set up to find boundary

58
Q

So as a summary:

A

⏳June 3rd 1947
⏳Divide India but retain maximum unity.
⏳the country would be partitioned but so would Punjab and Bengal. This would please both Congress and the Muslim League.
⏳A referendum was to be held in NWFP (North Western Frontier Province) and NEFP to ascertain whether the people in the area wanted to join India or not.
⏳the princely states would have the option of joining either of the two
dominions or to remain independent.
⏳an early transfer of power on the basis of Dominion status to India and
Pakistan.
⏳Early transfer had advantages for both Britain and Congress.
⏳a boundary Commission was to be set up.

59
Q

Name some reasons why the plan was accepted by Congress:

A
  • Pakistan was to be made as small as possible
  • Immediate transfer of power would stop Muslim League’s direct action
  • The sooner Britain quit, the better!
60
Q

Name some of the princely states:

A

-Kalat, Kashmir, Hyderabad…

61
Q

How was Pakistan divided?

A
  • Into east and west
  • now known as Bangladesh
  • divided by Radcliffe Line
  • suppose to be united but different types of Muslims and develop own language, holidays, distance between them…
  • Jinnah- Pakistan, Nehru- India
62
Q

Originally,BEFORE this final plan, what plans did Mountbatten come up with?

-First Draft- Plan Balkan:

A
  • allowed Indian states and provinces to decide own future
  • recipe for total anarchy
  • plan revealed to Nehru in a private meeting with Mountbatten
  • example of Mountbatten’s perceived partiality- Jinnah no preview
  • Nehru told M congress would reject plan (weaken India and congress party)
  • Jinnah wanted Pakistan to remain whole- undivided Punjab + Bengal- so could decide own future (eventual partition)
  • Jinnah continually refused to accept any arrangement that would produce ‘impoverished Pakistan’
  • plan torn up
63
Q

What was Mountbatten’s new attempt after this?

A
  • desperate to appease congress and get Jinnah’s agreement
  • desperate to get out of India before subcontinent destroyed (losing control of domestic situation)
  • areas of north west India in a state of riot and rebellion
  • frame of ICS (held India together in heyday of Raj) reduced to skeleton- looked to friends and relations for backing
  • Attlee’s declaration that British would be out of India by July 1948- bloody contests for supremacy in mixed Hindu and Muslim areas like Punjab
  • capacity for controlling the situation was compromised and collapsed altogether in Bihar
  • only authority- army and partition mean the army would no longer be a national body- Hindu split from Muslim, officers from men…
  • guesses would take 2-5 years to split Pakistan and India- Auchinleck was given 4 weeks to complete separation
  • Jinnah also in hurry- physically weak- tuberculosis= had to move fast if wants to see birth of Muslim state
  • on May (18th) 1947- M carried out plan for partition- complete separation of India and Pakistan
  • July 15th House of Commons announced in 1 months time- 2 separate dominions of India and Pakistan would be created in the Indian subcontinent
64
Q

What was the boundary commission?

A
  • between India and Pakistan, accommodate Hindus and Muslims in separate states
  • equal numbers of Hindus and Muslim judges
  • chairman- Sir Cyril Radcliffe- legal expert- impartial= no previous experience of India
  • used out of date maps, anecdotal stories of land ownership and old boundary charts
  • 5 weeks to make decision
65
Q

What rumours, leaks and pressure was there?

A
  • leaked to interested parties-applied pressure to commission to change its collective mind
  • Mountbatten himself- reach Nehru who would put pressure on him to influence Commission
  • EG: case of Firozpur- touch controlled the only bridge over the River Sutlej- strategic part of irrigation system of area
  • originally placed Firozpur inside Pakistan- intensive lobbying by Nehru and Congress- boundary moved (Radcliffe had dinner with Mountbatten-following day on other side of boundary)
  • Mountbatten not even handed- personal dislike of Jinnah and warm relationship with congress and due to fact thought Pakistan would be temporary and reabsorb into India- led him to strengthen India at expense of Pakistan
66
Q

How did the princes feel? Give some specific contributions they have given in the past eg: SWW:

A

-very devoted to Raj in SWW:
-Maharaja of Travancore- bought the Royal Indian Navy- armed patrol boat
-Nawab of Bhopal- bought fighter aircraft
-Nizam of Hyderabad- whole squadron of aeroplanes
-Maharajah of Kashmir- 18 field ambulances
-Princes invested in war effort buying 180 million rupees worth of war bonds
-300,000 Indian volunteers had joined India’s armed forces
-subcontinent split= felt ignored and threatened by congress- partly dedicated to removing sovereign powers
-Conrad cornfield (head of India’s political department) sympathised and persuaded new Secretary of State- Lord Listowel to agree that neither India nor Pakistan would inherit princely states when Raj ended- would become independent rulers- won concession
-cornfield authorised burning 4 tons of documents listing princes misdemeanours over years (scared congress would use for political blackmail)
-Nehru= furious- thought independent princes would mean disintegration of India, complete reverse of congress
-Mountbatten- resented being outwitted by an official- dismissed cornfield and called conference with Indian princes
🐐said would have to accede to either India or Pakistan depending on which state was nearer
🐂Exploited Royal connections, threatened, flattered…= all signed transfer of power from Raj to either India or Pakistan

67
Q

-Divides- what was the effect of the plan?

A
  • vast amount of administrative work
  • liabilities of the division- 82.5% for India and 17.5% for Pakistan
  • army, police, civil service, revenue service- all dismantled and reassembled
  • railways, schools, trucks, paper, pens…
  • 1 month= accumulation of everything- meticulously divided between dominions
  • impacted lives of people- devastating effects
  • millions of Hindus,Muslims, sikhs- terrified- wrong side of the India-Pakistan border- hostile to faith
  • abandoned homes, fields, livelihoods and walked crammed into bullock carts and railway systems
  • Muslims heading west received violence by Sikhs and Hindus in India
  • Hindu and Sikhs moving east murdered by Muslims in Pakistan
  • 10 million people tried to change lands in summer of 1947
  • 1 million Indians never made it to ‘promised land’
  • massacred
68
Q

-Did the British intervene and help a smooth transfer to power?

A
  • no
  • even when violence in Punjab at height- majority of British troops kept in barracks and evacuated the country
  • inadequate force of 50,000 troops dispatched to bring order to new frontier
  • unable to control situation, mostly stayed in barracks
  • Mountbatten himself thought them powerless to prevent violence 1946-48
  • Government instructions= troops only used to protect European lives
  • No Indian leader would have agreed on use of British troops
69
Q

Independence- when? Who?

A
  • 15th August 1947
  • Mountbatten after independence- Governor General of India only
  • Gandhi- left for Bengal- bitter- angry error of the past not rectified
  • Nehru- India, “India will awake to life and freedom” and “the soul of a nation, long suppressed, finds utterance”
  • Jinnah- Governor General of Pakistan
70
Q

-What is Brown’s argument about the Muslim separate state and independence?

A
  • Jinnah did not actually want partition
  • not popular Muslim demand (lots of different types of Muslims)- little sense to secure provincial majorities which offered nothing to scattered Muslims throughout subcontinent
  • little sense also for defence and economy
  • more for a bargaining counter- vague enough to unite Muslims and achieve recognition for Muslims as ‘nation’- therefore, more equal with congress on negotiations about future
71
Q

Overall summary- what was the boundary commission?

A
  • comprised equal numbers of Hindus and Muslims
  • chairman= Sir Cyril Radcliffe-legal expert
  • used out of date maps, anecdotal stories of land ownership and dusty boundary charts
  • only 5 weeks to complete their work
  • (some historians believe based on work by Churchill- recycled- not new and modern)
72
Q

Overall summary- independence:

A
  • 15th August 1947
  • Both Pakistan and India granted dominion status were allowed to sever all allegiance to crown (India-1950, Pakistan-1956)
  • British military withdrawal began in August 1947- continued until 1948
  • Mountbatten- powerless to prevent violence
  • Army should only be used to protect European lives
  • got 82.5% of British assets
  • Kashmir and Hyderabad not included (belongs to princes)
  • Pakistan only 17.5% of British assets
  • split Punjab and Bengal as well as India and Pakistan
  • Border conflicts
  • Burma became independent in 1948 (Myanmar)

-REMEMBER!! 👀

73
Q

-Strengths of the boundary commission: 🙂

A

✅Delivered in 5 weeks (done without opposition)
✅Can separate from crown
✅Neutral leader (eg: compared to Mountbatten) and expert in legal
✅Withdrawing quickly, allowing them their independence

74
Q

-weaknesses of boundary commission: ☹️

A

❌No support after making decision- no smooth transition, haven’t had that kind of independence for decades would need support
❌Sir Cyril Radcliffe- never been to India and outdated (but did mean impartial)
❌Only 5 weeks- very limited time- had Raj for hundreds of years what’s a few more years to provide a smooth transition? Rushed
❌Princes- no options
❌Favouring of Congress eg: Firozpur
❌Consequences- 1 million never made it and displacement
❌Britain- better deal- allegiance to crown but without support eg: still get good deals- trade

75
Q
  • After partition- New beginnings?

- Give examples of continuity after partition:

A
  • many British people stayed-ordinary civilians and officials- 83 civilian officers and Mountbatten himself- India’s constitution Governor General
  • Framed in old 1935 Government of India Act-250 identical clauses
  • The Indian Administrative (IAS) took over from old Indian Civil Service (ICS) of Raj- as late as 60-23 central secretariat departments in IAS-ICS trainee men headed 19 of them
  • hand over of economy- gradual eg: Indian tea industry remained in British hands
  • New administrators used of Raj bureaucracy eg: maps, manuels, handbooks…
76
Q

-New issues after partition:

A
  • refugee problem- displaced people
  • psychological damage- saw family members and villages decimated and lost- some never re-united
  • 30th Jan 1948- Nathuram Gods shot Gandhi as be addressed prayer- Delhi
  • not all Muslims happy about partition some in south couldn’t make it to Pakistan-30 million remained in India
  • Bengali Hindu-speaking Muslims= preferred to live in independent Bengal- by culture than religion
  • Pakistan government announced Urdu would be official language of Pakistan
  • Muslims who made it to Pakistan- better educated + rich- called Muhajirs- caused friction with local as filled government posts eg: Pakistan’s first prime minister- Liaquat Alikhan- assassinated 1951
77
Q

REMEMBER!

A

-better summarised in GoodNotes page 155 👀👀!!

78
Q

-Remember!!

A

-documentary notes on partition and movie ideas “Viceroy’s house” in GoodNotes and folder so look as part of revision 👀👀!!