india Flashcards
What factors contributed to the East India Company’s ability to maintain British control of India in the years 1829-58?
- Continued British military and economic dominance over India
- Increased competition from other European powers
- Challenges from Indian rulers and uprisings by Indian soldiers and civilians
- Economic challenges faced by the Company
Continued British military and economic dominance over India
The East India Company had a large and powerful army in India, which it used to maintain control over the region
The Company also controlled important economic resources, such as tea and opium, that were in high demand in Europe and Asia.
Increased competition from other European powers
The French and Portuguese established trading posts in India in the 17th and 18th centuries, and continued to compete with the East India Company for control over Indian territory and resources
The French briefly gained control of parts of southern India in the 18th century, but were eventually defeated by the British
Challenges from Indian rulers and uprisings by Indian soldiers and civilians
The Indian Rebellion of 1857:
The rebellion exposed the weaknesses of the East India Company’s rule in India, including its reliance on Indian soldiers and administrators, and its failure to address the economic and social grievances of Indian people
The rebellion led to the British government taking direct control of India in 1858, through the Government of India Act, which abolished the East India Company and established the British Raj
Economic challenges faced by the Company
The East India Company faced a debt crisis in the mid-19th century, caused in part by the high costs of its military campaigns and the declining profitability of its trade in India
Pressure from British politicians and business interests to reform the Company’s practices led to the passage of the Charter Act of 1833
What did the Charter Act of 1833 do?
Ended the company’s commercial activities completely and reorganised the administrative system of British territories - changed the function of the East India Company to ruling territories rather than protecting commercial interests
Abolished the Company’s monopoly on Indian trade and reduced its political power in India
What led to the outbreak of the Indian rebellion?
- Religious and cultural issues
- Political grievances
- Economic grievances
Religious and cultural issues
- William Sleeman’s campaign against thagi
- The drive against sati
- The drive against female infanticide
- The impact of missionaries
- The Rumour of 1856
- General Service Enlistment Act of 1856
What is thagi?
An Urdu word for those who practices highway robbery and ritual murder by strangling in the service of the Hindu mother goddess, Kali
William Sleeman’s campaign against thagi
It was based on capturing thagi and then using their confessions to track down and capture others
The action against thagi led to significant amounts of self-congratulation on the part of the British as the thagi only attacked other Indians, so the suppression of the cult was depicted as a wholly altruistic act
The effect of William Sleeman’s campaign against Thagi on the Indian rebellion
There has been some revisionism regarding Sleeman’s presentation of the thagi campaign by historians, its suppression does not seem to have been widely resented by Indians at the time (unlike other campaigns)
Of far greater significance was its impact on the British in India and the lessons they drew from the campaign for other social reforms
What is sati?
The tradition of self-immolation by Hindu widows on the funeral pyres of their husbands
The tradition reflected the Hindu belief in the sanctity of the marriage bond which meant that marriage was not an option for widows
The custom was most common among higher castes and the caste of those involved suggests that the motivation was primarily religious rather than economic necessity
The drive against sati
The movement was led by British officials, Indian social reformers, and religious leaders who saw sati as a barbaric practice that needed to be eliminated
The British estimated that around 600 deaths a year in their territories were taking place as a result of the custom and, in 1829, driven by a campaign by evangelical Christians such as William Wilberforce and Governor Bentinck’s own strongly held personal views, sati was abolished
Anyone assisting with a sati was deemed to be guilty of culpable homicide and prosecuted accordingly
The effect of sati on the Indian rebellion
While the abolition of sati was not the sole cause of the rebellion, it did contribute to a growing sense of discontent and disillusionment with British rule among certain sections of Indian society
The drive against sati was seen as part of a larger effort by the British to impose their values and way of life on the Indian people, and this generated resentment and anger that eventually boiled over into rebellion
The drive against female infanticide
Female infanticide stemmed from the difficulty of providing dowries for female children and the shame attached to having unmarried daughter
Bentinck enforced the laws that had been assed in 1795 and 182 against female infanticide
The effect of the drive against female infanticide on the Indian rebellion
The British government’s efforts to stop female infanticide were part of a larger campaign of social reform that aimed to challenge the prevailing social norms and customs in India
However, these efforts were often met with resistance, and some conservative elements in Indian society saw them as an attempt to undermine their cultural identity
The resentment and anger generated by these cultural clashes between the British administration and Indian society eventually boiled over into the Indian Rebellion of 1857
While the drive against female infanticide was not the primary cause of the rebellion, it was one of the several factors that contributed to the underlying tension between the British administration and Indian society
The impact of missionaries
On the one hand, missionaries were instrumental in promoting education, social reform, and women’s rights in India. They set up schools, hospitals, and other social institutions that helped to raise the standard of living for many Indians. They also challenged some of the prevailing social and cultural norms in India, such as caste discrimination, sati, and female infanticide
On the other hand, some missionaries were perceived as cultural and religious intruders by certain sections of Indian society. Their efforts to convert Indians to Christianity were viewed with suspicion and resistance, and some Hindus and Muslims saw them as a threat to their religious and cultural identity