Increasing tensions 1774-8 Flashcards
Intendents - strengths
- 33 in total – power dispersed (eg they control taxes, respond to local grievances, preside over local courts, coordinate activies of the police) and not all burdened on Louis so more effective local government
- They could request ‘lettres de cahet’ so held authority
intendents - weaknesses
- Only one intendent per generalitie – they were overworked and allocated too few staff
- Had to obtain an order from the King’s council in order to act – slow and ineffective process which still all resolved around Louis
- Victim of France’s poor, outdated and confused administrative set-up which meant their roles cashed with that of the seigneurs
- Too young and inexperienced – eg Charles Alexandra Calonne became an intendent at the age of 32
weaknesses of provincial governors
- 1779: there were 39 governors
- theoretically the King’s representatives but in many areas they had become intrenched in certain families who acted like a ‘provincial dynasty’
- not always fit for position because they aren’t elected through ability
- hierarchical system incompatible with growing enlightened ideas which demanded representation and more equality
seigneurs - strengths
Land- owning nobles who resolved disputes, organised poor relief, had administrative duties – effective distribution of power
seigneurs - weaknesses
- Peasants could be tried in seigneurial courts held on the lord’s estate; there were some 100,000 such courts
- seigneurs weren’t always fair and so could abuse power
- seigneurial rights became increasingly unpopular, especially with growing Enlightened ideas
the King and court - strengths
Louis can choose his chief ministers which creates a more unified and cohesive government as there is less opposition to his rule
the King and court - weaknesses
- His choices aren’t generally based on efficiency or quality of the ministers, but more on how compliant they are, and if those around him like them (eg Marie- Antionette put a lot of pressure on him)
- Louis fires competent ministers if they don’t agree with his rule because he’s an absolute monarch. Eg Necker
- ‘lettres de cahet’ was extremely an extremely unpopular feature of Louis’ absolutist rule
representative bodies - strengths
- Hierarchy of royal courts stretching from the prévôtés, through 430 bailliage courts, to 13 parlements. High number – legislative power dispersed – effective law
- The courts hear cases so give representation/freedom to the people
representative bodies - weaknesses
- The parlements had a right to question and criticise decrees to the King directly, and could force him to reconsider by sending a ‘remonstrance’. Slowed down law making process. Also, the king was able to overrule the parlements through the lit de jusice so they didn’t even have much power.
- Parlements were dominated by 1st and 2nd estate so didn’t give proper representation
- The parlements also controlled guilds, corporations and markets as well as local government finances and law and order. They could come into conflict with the intendents.
Nature of Louis’ Kingship - weaknesses
- Early death of his brother meant that he became king at 20 and wasn’t prepared for it – perceived as weak-willed and indecisive. He apparently said, on his accession, ‘Protect us, Lord, for we reign too young.’
- A British Ambassador wrote about Louis at the start of his reign that he seemed a ‘young, inexperienced mind’
- Louis had a passion for locks – people perceived him as odd and introverted
- He kept is personal expenditure down but this made him look weak next to the strong willed, extravagant Marie-Antionette.
- It took eight years for Louis to produce an heir – further scandal and gossip around their competence as monarchs
- He was short sighted so was always squinting and appeared clumsy/ridiculous: One of Marie Antionette’s ladies in waiting described him as looking ‘like some peasant shambling along behind his plough’
Marie Antionette - weaknesses
- Marie-Antionette was nicknamed ‘Madame Deficit’ due to her frivolous spending.
- Reputation made worse by the ‘Diamond Necklace Affair’: the story suggested an affair with Cardinal Rohan involving the spending of large sums of money on a diamond necklace.
Rigid social structure - weaknesses
- Only a very small proportion of bourgeoisie members could buy venal office due to the rapid increase in their cost throughout the 1700s; a minor office could cost 20,000 livres, while higher offices with immediate noble status were in excess of 50,000 livres.
- Even if noble status was aquired, the noblesse de robe would be looked down on by the noblesse d’épée, which built up resentment amongst the members of the bourgeoisie, many of whom were superior in intellect and ability to members of the hereditary nobility.
flexible social structure - strengths
- Possibility of buying venal office: more than 70,000 members of the noblesse de robe by 1789
- Venal office incentivised members of the bourgeoisie to climb up the ranks in society - propped up the feudal system
3rd estate grievances
- Tax burden: all members of the 3rd estate were subject to the taille (brought in around 20 million livres a year and made up 16% of the govenment’s total income)
- Members of the 3rd estate had an additional duty called the corvee royale, which was unpaid labour service to maintain the King’s roads or other public benefits.
- The feudal peasants were also subject to a range of seigneurial dues, including the champart (paid in grain) and the cens (paid in cash), which further highlights the unjust social structure in France.
2nd estate grievances
The provincial nobles with lesser titles and smaller land holdings, often referred to as the hobereaux (‘old birds’), had usually lost most of their land and wealth, despite retaining their privileges and the snobbery that came with them.
As a result, these nobles resented the rising bourgeoisie, who had outstripped them in land and wealth, as well as the monarchy, who they felt weren’t trying hard enough to protect the nobility and their property.