Inchoate Offenses Flashcards

1
Q

What are the three inchoate offenses?

A
  • attempt
  • conspiracy
  • solicitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the elements req’d to convict someone of conspiracy?

A

(a) an agreement between 2+ ppl (b) intent to enter into the agreement and (c) an intent by 2+ ppl to achieve the objective of the agreement.

+ the objective of agreement must be criminal OR objective achieved thru criminal means

c/l - no overt act req’d
MPC - over act req’d, mere prep sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Does agreement in conspiracy need to be express?

A

No, can be inferred from joint activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is required of the ‘agreement” parties enter into for a conspiracy? What happens when only one party has criminal intent?

A

Agreement = agree to accomplish same objective by mutual action.

Under MPC, unilateral approach = if one party does NOT have criminal intent, other can still be charged with conspiracy (e.g. undercover cop + person with criminal intent)

Under c/l, both parties must have criminal intent, (e.g. if one person is joking and the other has criminal intent, then 2nd person not liable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the Wharton Rule?

A

The Wharton rule says that if, e.g., 2 ppl are required to commit a crime, then for a conspiracy to occur there needs to be at least one more person involved, e.g. 3 (adultery, dueling).

Note: this does not apply to necessary parties not provided for, so if two parties are necessary for commission of crime, but the state only holds one liable, the other can be held liable for conspiracy (tho not the crime, remember). (e.g. seller sells drugs to buyer, statute provides for liability for seller but not buyer, buyer can be held liable for conspiracy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happens when someone is in a protected class and makes agreement to commit that crime with someone outside the class?

A

Neither can be held liable for conspiracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happens when a co-conspirators are acquitted, and one remaining co-conspirator is being charged with conspiracy?

A

D may not be convicted if all co-conspirators have been acquitted. BUT if others are not pursues and D is charged alone, can still be convicted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What mental state is required for conspiracy?

A

Specific intent, so (a) intent to agree and (b) intent to achieve objective of the conspiracy.

Note: remember, in c/l bilateral approach, BOTH parties need intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What form of action is required to convict of conspiracy?

A

Under c/l, none. Majority of states follow MPC, which says some overt act to further conspiracy - mere prep suffices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When does a conspiracy terminate? Why is this important?

A

A conspiracy terminates upon completion of the wrongful objective. Acts of concealment after the fact are not considered part of the conspiracy.

This is relevant b/c statements of co-conspirators are admissible if they were made during conspiracy in furtherance of it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When will a co-conspirator be liable for the crimes of other co-conspirators that were not the direct object of the conspiracy?

A

When the crimes (1) were committed in furtherance of the conspiracy and (2) were foreseeable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are not the defenses to conspiracy?

A

NOT:

  • factual impossibility
  • withdrawal, b.c conspiracy is complete as soon as agreement + overt act (but withdrawal could be defense to crimes in furtherance of conspiracy)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What must a co-conspirator do to effectively withdraw from a conspiracy?

A

Perform affirmative act that notifies all parties involved + give notice in time for plans to be abandoned + neutralize any assistance if given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the elements of solicitation?

A

(a) person asks, incites, counsels, advises, urges, or commands another to commit a crime and (b) with the intent that the person commit the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are/are not defenses to solicitation?

A

defense: solicitor could not have been found guilty of crime due to leg intent

NOT defenses:
- factual impossibility
- person asked is not convicted 
- person asked does not complete crime
- solicitor renounces or withdraws ask
    BUT:  Under MPC, renunciation will be a defense if they prevent commission of crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If person commits crime or attempts to after being solicited, what crimes may solictor/actor be convicted of?

A

If person commits crime, both can be held liable wrt crime, one for crime other for solicitation. OR both can be held liable for crime, one as primary other as accomplice.

If person commits acts in attempt of crime, then they can be convicted of attempt, other for solicitation. Or both for attempt.

If person agrees but doesn’t do anything sufficient for attempt, then both can be convicted of conspiracy.

BUT, solicitor can NOT be convicted both of solicitation and any of these offenses (conspiracy, attempt, etc)

17
Q

What are the elements of attempt?

A

act done with intent to commit a crime, req’s (1) specific intent and (2) an overt act in furtherance of the crime

(1) D must intent to perform an act that would constitute a crime if performed (Note: even if intended crime does not require specific intent, it is req’d for attempt)
(2) over act - must be beyond mere prep, c/l courts use “proximity test,” i.e. must be dangerously close to committing crime, MPC follows “substantial step”

18
Q

Can someone attempting a crime that requiring negligence or recklessness?

A

No, cannot intend to be negligent or reckless.

19
Q

What are/not defenses to attempt?

A

NOT a defense:

  • abandonment - not at c/l, but under MPC fully voluntary and complete abandonment is
  • factual impossibility (i.e. could not have performed steps

Defense:
- legal impossibility - i.e. steps as D intended to perform them wouldn’t have resulted in the commission of a crime

20
Q

What may a D be charged with if they attempted and completed the crime?

A

Either attempt or completion, not both.