Inchoate Offenses Flashcards
What are the three inchoate offenses?
- attempt
- conspiracy
- solicitation
What are the elements req’d to convict someone of conspiracy?
(a) an agreement between 2+ ppl (b) intent to enter into the agreement and (c) an intent by 2+ ppl to achieve the objective of the agreement.
+ the objective of agreement must be criminal OR objective achieved thru criminal means
c/l - no overt act req’d
MPC - over act req’d, mere prep sufficient
Does agreement in conspiracy need to be express?
No, can be inferred from joint activity
What is required of the ‘agreement” parties enter into for a conspiracy? What happens when only one party has criminal intent?
Agreement = agree to accomplish same objective by mutual action.
Under MPC, unilateral approach = if one party does NOT have criminal intent, other can still be charged with conspiracy (e.g. undercover cop + person with criminal intent)
Under c/l, both parties must have criminal intent, (e.g. if one person is joking and the other has criminal intent, then 2nd person not liable)
What is the Wharton Rule?
The Wharton rule says that if, e.g., 2 ppl are required to commit a crime, then for a conspiracy to occur there needs to be at least one more person involved, e.g. 3 (adultery, dueling).
Note: this does not apply to necessary parties not provided for, so if two parties are necessary for commission of crime, but the state only holds one liable, the other can be held liable for conspiracy (tho not the crime, remember). (e.g. seller sells drugs to buyer, statute provides for liability for seller but not buyer, buyer can be held liable for conspiracy)
What happens when someone is in a protected class and makes agreement to commit that crime with someone outside the class?
Neither can be held liable for conspiracy.
What happens when a co-conspirators are acquitted, and one remaining co-conspirator is being charged with conspiracy?
D may not be convicted if all co-conspirators have been acquitted. BUT if others are not pursues and D is charged alone, can still be convicted.
What mental state is required for conspiracy?
Specific intent, so (a) intent to agree and (b) intent to achieve objective of the conspiracy.
Note: remember, in c/l bilateral approach, BOTH parties need intent
What form of action is required to convict of conspiracy?
Under c/l, none. Majority of states follow MPC, which says some overt act to further conspiracy - mere prep suffices.
When does a conspiracy terminate? Why is this important?
A conspiracy terminates upon completion of the wrongful objective. Acts of concealment after the fact are not considered part of the conspiracy.
This is relevant b/c statements of co-conspirators are admissible if they were made during conspiracy in furtherance of it.
When will a co-conspirator be liable for the crimes of other co-conspirators that were not the direct object of the conspiracy?
When the crimes (1) were committed in furtherance of the conspiracy and (2) were foreseeable.
What are not the defenses to conspiracy?
NOT:
- factual impossibility
- withdrawal, b.c conspiracy is complete as soon as agreement + overt act (but withdrawal could be defense to crimes in furtherance of conspiracy)
What must a co-conspirator do to effectively withdraw from a conspiracy?
Perform affirmative act that notifies all parties involved + give notice in time for plans to be abandoned + neutralize any assistance if given
What are the elements of solicitation?
(a) person asks, incites, counsels, advises, urges, or commands another to commit a crime and (b) with the intent that the person commit the crime.
What are/are not defenses to solicitation?
defense: solicitor could not have been found guilty of crime due to leg intent
NOT defenses: - factual impossibility - person asked is not convicted - person asked does not complete crime - solicitor renounces or withdraws ask BUT: Under MPC, renunciation will be a defense if they prevent commission of crime