Inchoate offences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define attempt

A

attempt is best defined in The people (AG) v Thorton “as an act done by the accused with a specific intent to commit a particular crime, it
must go beyond mere preparation and must be a direct movement towards the commission after the preparations have been made.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what difficulties arise in Actus reus for attempt ?

A

Difficulty comes at the boundaries of the attempt and the preparation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was held in the case of R v Eagleton?

A

It was held that mere intention is not criminal and that Some acts immediately connected with it are required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the facts of R v Campbell

A

accused loitering outside post office with imitation firearm. The court of appeal held that this amounted to mere preparation and that he had not initiated commission of the crime yet, therefore there was no attempt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was held in the case of R v Jones?

A

getting in car and pointing shotgun at somebody constituted more than preparation, buying the
shotgun and sawing off the barrel was preparation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was held in the case of AG v Sullivan?

A

acts must be sufficiently proximate to the commission of the substantive force in order to be considered an attempt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the mens rea for attempt?

A

Mens rea for attempt is full-on intention, this remains the case even if a lesser mens rea would suffice for
the full offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Impossibility as a defence to a criminal charge

A

So if a crime is physically or legally impossible to commit, a person can not be convicted of attempted it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the facts of Haughton v Smith (legal impossibility)

A

police intercepted carriage of stolen beef, but decided to let it continue to see who
intercepted it, accused was charged with attempt to handle stolen goods, however this failed as the goods
were no longer ‘stolen’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Abandonment (AG v O’Sullivan)

A

if he abandons plan, he is absolved from liability, depends on when exactly the plan was abandoned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

convictions for attempt

A

Persons convicted of an attempt may be punished as though they had been convicted of the substantive
offence.
○ ss.3 and 4 CJA 1990 - attempted murder minimum 20 year sentence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is conspiracy?

A

Connelly v Lochney - defined conspiracy as an agreement or combination between two or more persons to carry an
unlawful obect, or a lawful object by unlawful means.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the actus reus for conspiracy?

A

It was defined in the case of R v Parnell. A civil wrong can be criminal if agreed upon by a group eg not paying bills.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

will mere preparation amount to a conspiracy?

A

Similarly to attempts, mere preparation will not amount to a conspiracy. For example, a
conversation about stealing a payroll was held not to amount to conspiracy in R v Walker.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was held in the case of the people (AG v Keane)

A

There is no need for the existence of a definite plan to be proven. An agreement to
commit an unlawful act in The People (AG) v Keane was deemed conspiracy under the law even though the parties had not even met.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is required for conspiracy according to R v Orton

A

What is required is a conscious

understanding of a common design

17
Q

what are the facts of DPP v Nock and Alsford (impossibility)

A

conspiracy to handle cocaine, powder actually handled had no cocaine, conviction not upheld.

18
Q

what did section 71 of the criminal justice act 2006. introduce?

A

it introduced various measures to deal with gangland activity, codified the offence of conspiracy in certain specific circumstances.

19
Q

how was incitement defined in Race relations Board v Applin?

A

A person may “incite” another to do an act by threatening or by pressure as well as by persuasion.”

20
Q

Actus Reus for incitement

A

The external element of incitment is committing of any act, which influences another person to commit an offence.

21
Q

what are the facts of people (AG) v Capaldi?

A

man offered money to doctor to ‘do something’ about an unplanned pregnancy.

22
Q

explain the crime of soliciting to commit murder

A

It is an offence contrary to s. 4, Offences Against the Person Act, 1861 to ‘solicit, encourage,
persuade, or endeavour to persuade, or … propose to any person, to murder any other person.’
The maximum penalty which may be imposed in respect of this offence is 10 years’ imprisonment.

23
Q

what was held in the case of DPP v Gillane?

A

It was held that it is not necessary that the person solicited should know details about the intended victim so
long as there is a definite intended victim.

24
Q

incitement to hatred

A

Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred act 1989

s.2 prohibits words and actions likely to incite hatred, s.3 broadcasts likely to incite hatred, 2 years €10,000.