Inchoate Crimes Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Attempt

A
  1. a specific intent to bring a a criminal result and a significant overt act (beyond mere preparation) in furtherance of that intent
    a. proximity test- how close in time and distance
    b. equivocality test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Defenses to Attempt

A

ComLaw- legal impossibility is a defense, factual impossibility and abandonment is NOT

ModLaw- voluntary & complete abandonment; legal impossibility is a defense, factual impossibility and abandonment is NOT a defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Defenses to Solicitation

A

ComLaw- NO defenses

ModLaw-specific intent defense applies; impossibility and withdrawal are NOT defenses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Defenses to Concpiracy

A

ComLaw- Impossibility and withdrawal are NOT defenses

MPC- Timely Withdrawal + Act to thwart conspiracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Pinkerton Doctrine

A

1- each conspirator is liable for the crimes of all other co-conspirators when crimes are both:

a- foreseeable outgrowth of the conspiracy

b- committed in furtherance of the conspiratorial goal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

“One-person” conspiracy

A

MPC allows for a criminal and an undercover police officer to create a conspiracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Co-conspirator acquittal in a 2 person conspiracy results in:

A

acquittal for the other co-conspirator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Wharton Rule

A

a conspiracy cannot occur if a crime requires 2 people by statutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When is an individual criminally liable as an accomplice?

A
  1. when he gives assistance or encouragement to the crime of another or
  2. when he has a legal duty to oppose another’s crime and purposefully intends effectuate commission of the crime

***even slight assistance or encouragement is sufficient, words alone may suffice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

An accomplice’s Mens Rea

A

ComLaw/Majority - specific intent

Minority- knowingly assisting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can an accomplice sever liability for future crimes?

A

by withdrawal or abandonment, and must give notice to accomplices

***sometimes required to help neutralize prior assistance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Principal in the 1st degree

A

actual perpetrator that performs the crime w/ the requisite mental intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Principal in the 2nd degree

A

one who is present at the scene of the crime and aids, abets, or otherwise encourages with the requisite intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Accessory before the fact

A

One who aids abets, counsels, or encourages the commission of a felony but is not present at the scence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Accessory after the fact

A

1- completed felony must have been committed

2- accessory must have known of the commission

3-accessory must have personally given aid to the felon or have hindered the felons apprehension, conviction or punishment

***not an “accomplice”; punished less than the actual felons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly